I am fully aware as to the business (LLC) status of Commodore USA. Having run businesses of my own, I'm well aware of the perks (and drawbacks) of an LLC. If I gave the impression I was thumbing my nose at LLC status, or otherwise implying C-USA is "not a business", that was not intended. I don't believe I implied otherwise. They have every right to conduct business as they wish, and unlike many here - I have zero interests or stake in some ideal that they are "defiling the Amiga name".
No one, including me - expects them to see the community as a charity case.
That being said, don't ask the community to see them as anything other that a commodity PC vendor selling Linux boxes. Barry's own interview confirmed as much.
I wish C-USA no ill will. I do not dislike Barry, Leo, Dammy, etc. - or anyone else in the extended community. I assure you if I was waiting with baited breath hoping they fail, I'd let you know.
In fact I hope they make a rock solid PC that people buy and enjoy for many years to come. That being said, it is becoming tiring on A.org and other well established Amiga forums portals how a commodity PC vendor is going to "save us all", when they themselves have so much as stated they are selling commodity boxes under a nostalgic name.
Just as I would be if Dell showed up here spamming adverts and press for their Intel machines. Best of luck, but how it pertains to any of us is beyond me. People would like to see some actual Amiga content on A.org rather than bickering about a PC vendor.
No one is "demanding" a single thing from C-USA. In fact, their challenge to the community was largely ignored and laughed off due to the terms of it. They brought that to us. No one was willing to pony up a single dime to a commodity PC vendor that for 2 years has done nothing but be extremely abusive towards them, and you can't blame them in the least for that.
Ok, I can agree with a bit of that overall. I agree that bickering is no good for anyone. Thank you for your patience as we overall get some degree of understanding across. I just hope the overall community isn't demanding then to fulfill some age old broken promise of Escom or Gateway. I am confident that if there is budgetary room for more direct support of Commodore and Amiga classics, the would support it if enough people are willing to purchase.
There needs to be enough to support small volumes of products like 500-1000 units of a product. It needs to meet minimum orders conditions or you get too many to meet minimum order volumes but not enough purchases and you can see that is lots of money down the toilet. Jens been down that road and it kind of hurt him financially a little bit for a bit and added frustration with just 300 units of C-One produced. The demand isn't entirely unreasonable with maybe an issue of escrow account. Not sure about that.
If you want a $2000 computer then ok.... 500x$2000 would equal $1,000,000.
If you want a $500 hw spec then you got $250,000 to raise. Maybe I read it wrong but ok.
If they are going to use a custom designed platform then they need to get revenues for that. It is probably easier to develop a state of the art desktop environment following UI mechanics from the now expired patents in a modern 3d twist on next generation.
Hardware like new semiconductor ISA and development of such would be incredably challenging for anyone. They would have to get the old MOS plant and if there is remotely any of the foundry equipment there.. They would need to get that equipment updated at minimum to add additional stepper lenses to reduce the UV beam from 3 microns to um... 30 nm and pray to god it works and upgraded microscope to see that small accurately. We would need someone to make the photolithographs. None of this I would expect to work successfully for too many reasons. It would be easier to go fabless and that facility could be suitable for that and meet EPA. Maybe we be lucky to find anything there.
That is why I would be critical of expecting any new Amiga PPC hw that is competitive.
If they were to invest in such R&D, it would be something new not being overly concerned with technologies that the patents expired 3-6 years ago.
For someone to make new patentable hw, it is going to cost some $$$.
I don't think they are ready for that in-house.