Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers  (Read 124903 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« on: April 27, 2012, 12:29:22 PM »
Quote from: OlafS3;688988
I have shortly read the paragraphs regarding the existing community and it is clear that they have not invested anything and will not ("waste of money"). Aros would be the only interesting for them (X86) but they are not allowed to do (AmigaInc/Hyperion) and because of that they will never invest just one cent in it. All 68k projects are interesting but they will not invest, PPC is not interesting and they would never invest in a port of AOS or MorphOS and besides they want to control the OS. Therefore all closed source OSs are not interesting. So we know what we all can expect of them. Nothing. What I do not understand why they keep on trying to get on amigasites in the news if they are not interested in the community.


"Commodore USA, LLC." can not because that would and could violate the ruling of a U.S. Judge which nevertheless could be appealed by measures of statutory reasons BUT that is problematic because it was a settlement and ruling of a settlement and became contractual.

However, Barry can personally invest legally as an LLC. is by statutes a sepaerate "person" by statutes fro Barry. It is a seperate entity. Now, "person" in laws have been standardly stated in virtually all federal and states, as any "natural person", corporation, limited liability partnership, limited liability company, etc. Natural person has a specific meaning.

Barry may personally donate but that is not about Commodore USA, LLC. That is seperate matters. Keep that in mind. Violating court judgement when knowing the ramifications can be quite serious.

Those of you less then savory type might know what contempt of court ramifications are. Think bigger fines and federal prison in this case. Not worth it.

The legal contestment is that the conditions of ruling must be enforceable and rational. Does the ruling meet the rational basis review test. Did it violate Amiga's ownership rights to begin with and Amiga's right as copyright holder to terminate a contract. So to the equitable capacity of hyperion, it probably isn't an issue of whether or not, Commodore USA / Amiga Inc. Terminate hyperion license and equitable revenue of Amiga OS. The problem at some point is that it become systemically moot.

Hyperion only has license of a copyright not a patent. No copyright protection over Intuition and user interface concept. Amiga copyright only extends to software code and art but does not cover user interfaces which requires patenting. That patent expired. It is public domain and because of that, Hyperion has no standing on patent. The standing of case is merely Hyperions code contribution between 3.1 to 4.1. Hyperion's framework of code is largely PPC matters and if all PPC code which is C/C++ source or PPC assembly would be moot to different computing platform.

Precedence of judicial rulings on threshold of "__________-like" in software must be kept. For license and matters to apply, it must deemed work derivative to which Hyperion has ultimate right over. Then what is the point.

I can certainly use a UI feel that follows expired patent and license Commodore and because it is completely different code base, hyperion wouldn't have a copyright ground because there is no statutory authority to copyright laws for protecting user interface mechanics and no code from 68k or any Amiga or Hyperion source ever used. I can can put it in Java and hard compile it to binary x86. In turn, they have no equitable power over the outcome.

The precence of gary kildall vs. microsoft (the cp/m and MS-dos case must be bared in mind)

A style of feel of a user interface and the mechanics of that of an invented software is a patent thing. It expired and I have the patent file. In the end, it doesn't matter. That is yester-decades ago.

The problem with so many of you is you are demanding CommodoreUSA to fulfill Escom's bull**** and trying to start from 1993 tech. Guess what, motorola has stopped major advancement in the 68k processor. The fastest one is the 68k coldfire and some under the dragonball name from Motorola/Freescale. It is dated and slow. 266 MHz? Um... Well overclock... 300 Mhz.

My bone to pick with the nut jobs on this forum is in nearly 20 years since the last Amiga model was introduced, would you want an Amiga for your day to day regular mainstream computer that compares with your actual paid job or even the kind of job you had got your original Amiga. How many of you got the Amiga 4000 and other power house for movie and other professional graphics work. Would that Natami or other Amiga clones even meet the scrutiny and power and capability that your work place would need today. Would it meet the needs of George Lucas and others. Lets get serious. Amiga was the graphic minicomputer workstation for the masses that can sit on your desk. That kind of professional stature and ability is exactly the kind of stuff Amiga was remembered for. A modern Amiga line must model as a premier of quality graphics with strong grahic facilities. Amiga models with wacoms and various professional graphic software suites for the sectors in professional graphics like DTP, movie & TV CGI, CAD/Arch/engineering, etc.

This would re-signify it as a serious system for such.

Barry was very much in place where it really was used and knows first hand what Amiga was about for much of Amiga history beyond the video games which was captured in the Amiga 500 more then anything. The beefier Amigas were more seriously used. They weren't toys That you just dicked around with. Of course, a majority of you didn't have a 4000 or 4000T until they were surplused off or you finally got a job working for a cgi company that upgraded to SGI O2 and later models and pentium MMX PCs and just said taken em, dump em, whatever and you took em home.

Some was after sever passing around. Barry was a 1st gen user not 2nd gen. He was old enough to know more of what it was about as an adult vs. a child with fantacized imagery of how things were or a young teenager in high school breaking the law in piracy, hacking, cracking and what not along with cyber-"punk" theme demo culture with techno and other late 80s and early 90s metal. Many of you are late 30s, early 40s. Why haven't some of you guys made it big as big leading guys instead of falling out of the big time stuff. I think those issues lie with yourself not with the computer.

Some of you have problems and the computer became a security blanket.  That can be bad. If you can enjoy the commodore and amiga but not need it then you are good. If your life is too attached... That kind of fanaticism is a little kinky and wrong for your own sake. Ie. Tne Amiga computer wasn't meant to be our actual girlfriend. ( poke and jab joke but to make the bottom line point )

As to a modern computer product, it must be modern. The macs today are nothing like the old mac by hardware or its actual OS.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2012, 12:43:50 PM »
Shutup,

Put your $$$$ to invest in the brand, company, acquiring the rights. Just because you bought the computer. I been an owner of Commodore computer as far back as the 80s. You have no invested interest in the IP.

Your interest is selfish and to your own personal gain. You don't believe anyone should buy and make money on the brand or that they are going to be some 1 hour a month bull **** business that does nothing. You guys don't buy new hardware.

If you can't really make Jens Schonfeld and others what their economic worth it, then I would have a hard time believing your intent to support. Even then, it is hard to classify him and some of these folks real businesses. They are supporting quasi-businesses. As for thee hobby and quasi-projects... It will only go so long and then what?  Maybe it is ti e the old hw is museum piece while you enjoy the spirit of it via emulation. Oh wait.... You already do that...well most of you.

How many of you use this for real life serious business and professional work use. If there is 100s of members registered to this forum and only a few talk, that isn't enough. 2-3 out of a 100... How many of you is it just a pass time weekend hobby. How much is it serious daily business and work use.



Quote from: Digiman;690628
I don't like those threads either but they're started by other Amigans not the manufacturer.


They do indeed have that right however calling PCs with Linux in HTPC cases "Amiga" disaster/scam is our only interest. Perhaps Google search results willhelp keep fools from parting with their $$$



Not really, FREE engraved Amiga logo by Chinese manufacturer and some money paid to Amiga Inc is as Amiga as their overprice HTPC Wintel machine gets. Not even AROS tested.

If you don't like me trying to stop some clueless scum trying to rape one of my childhood brands today then just skip this thread. I'm morally on the high ground here vs C=USA sorry.



We are debating every aspect of this lamentable situation here!

Until C=USA make an effort it is my duty to tell people the TRUTH!
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2012, 05:15:27 PM »
Quote from: Darrin;690675
I like the way that Barry, sorry Wildstar128 thinks that we're the crazy ones, and not someone with a type AAA+ personality disorder who thought he could muscle in on an existing community, claim to be Jesus Christ and then dictate a new direction for the Amiga that happens to walk all over the existing x86 and Linux communities.

He also apparently thinks that the Hyperion/Amiga Inc settlement has forced C-USA to lie, insult and spam.

Finally, he thinks we are upset about what Barry hasn't done, while it is actually what he has done (lies, insults and spam).

You would think that the fact that we're debating this in a thread on Amiga.org and not CommodoreAmiga.net would make the bells ring as to who has the mental problems here.  :D


LOL.... I wish because then I have the resources to acquire the IP. Sorry, I am not Barry.

To the point, put your money where your mouth is. You have no more of rights over intellectual property then 10 to 20 million Commodore owners who had first generation purchasing of Commodore products. First generation purchase: I mean, purchased from authorized Commodore distribution and had the official warranties with Commodore or at least qualified. In other words, you didn't get your first Commodore from another another customer.

As for feeling that you guys think they have any rights over the trademark with all about 10-11 full pages worth of questions that are really unrealistic claims.

What I am trying to get at is why you guys waste so many pages of questions that you already know the answer is that the your suggestions are totally useless and only serves less than a 1000 individuals worldwide. Real companies for international commercial trade of goods requires a market base of at least a million potential customers.

If you have potential customer base of 1000 individuals then you have to spend no more then $100 in R&D.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 07:44:55 PM by Argo »
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2012, 05:29:46 PM »
Quote from: Tripitaka;690676
Painful reading. Is English a second language or are you still at school?


Trip,

I guess so when it was 3:## AM at USA pacific coast time. Give it a wild guess and figure that I was up since 8:30 AM of the preceeding day.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2012, 10:49:43 PM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;690725
Actually, some of us remember the Amiga for (get this) being a really neat design in both hardware and software, not for giving Amiga owners a bigger e-penis than PC owners. I don't really care what clock speed is or isn't attained, I'd just like to see a new computer that's a worthy follow-up to what was really an amazingly elegant system for its day.

So? The exact same can be said about nearly everybody else in this community. It's not like Barry was present on the mountain with Carl Sassenrath and Dave Haynie for the Transfiguration of Jay Miner. How does this make him any more qualified to do anything Amiga-related than anybody else here?


Uh, wait, we "don't buy new hardware?" How is it that the first run of  the X1000 sold out and they're doing a second run, then? Unless you mean  we don't buy new hardware that's assembled from stock PC components  we could get for less than half the cost, perhaps?

What's your criteria for a "real business?"


So? Doesn't mean we're obligated to agree with or approve of the doings of any random schmoe who's shelled out to Bill McEwen.

I'll remind you that this whole thing was Barry's idea. He asked for  questions and we gave him questions; if they weren't the questions he  wanted, that's his problem.

First, I am not afraid the 90% of wackos with maybe 10% actually have grown up and matured somewhat.

Second, if we want to be civilized, fine. Lets go with that but seriously if you want to ask someone who is investing a bit of his or her own money as well as serious business venture capitalists then you better stop with silly notions of ressurecting antiquate technology that not even god and Jay Miner combined could compete with todays tech. Guess what, new inventions came about since then and are fully patented. They aren't sharing their golden goose with anyone unless you talk big bucks like big bucks for even the likes of Bill Gates.

Commodore USA makes more money per year then every single Commodore 8 Bit and Amiga hobbyist-business makes from sales combined. Every one of you except maybe Jim Brain loses money and every one of you can't pay yourself on any classic hardware venture.

Why? There just is not enough people using the real hardware. Many of you collected them but nearly none of you use the hardware. So what is the experience for you now? Virtual emulated hardware. Nearly implies there is a few. I am not arguing that.

The next computer "revolution" isn't going to happen for probably 60 years. 30 years to make a viable quantum processor. Another 30 years red taped by National Security Agency of the NWO - the American Global Empire of the world. So, it isn't going to be seen for long after most of you are dead or wrinkled up old men and some women.

I challenge you to come up with a serious plan for product that can be sold to hundreds of thousands of people. I challenge you in this for a product that sustains interst in the Commodore brand, new and even old technology and support.

The interesting thing is, Commodore USA has helped in slowing down the eroding members of the Commodore community. If you paid attention, you probably seen some new faces or faces from old Commodore users from the 80s that left in the late 80s and early 90s reconnecting with Commodore technology and community. Something that has in fact help to slow down the decline.

However, old tech like the c64 and all of the classic Amiga models even with the best PPC cards ever made are really not up to the task of contemporary computing in any viable way.

I'll ask you to a task, design a 4500 sq.ft. House, two stories and prepare construction documents with visual rendering, mass model in a google earth visualization, I would need foundation plans, wall plans with proper national cad standards (US) in US measurements, roof plans, framing plan and door and window schedules. All the Construction document information must meet the following plan standards on 24x36 sheets and be distributed in PDF format. The CAD files must be distributed in Google Sketchup, .dwg files (autocad 2006 and after compatible) and Archicad/revit formats of the IFC formats supported by Revit and ArchiCad and other BIM tools.

Plan standards - http://ncbdc.com/plan_standards.htm

They shall be done in 30 days. I want to see that done all on the ol' Amiga PPC computers.

We can do that on Windows, Linux (COS-V included), MacOS X but are your Amiga system efficiently up to the task to meet the interoperability of various consultants tool chains as well as your own as the lead design professional.

I understand this isn't how you use the computer but Amiga and Commodore 8 bit were designed for serious use at their time. The demand of what computers are expected to do has changed alot. We now have sophisticated networking interoperability.

Commodore USA is looking for products that will serve as primary use like your primary computer. They aren't looking at selling products that would be used part-time. Computers are a tool.

The majority of the people, computer is an investment. As in "for work and for play". The point is accurate to what computers are suppose to be used for work as well as for entertainment. It wasn't manufactured or produced to be desk decoration.

It is like asking Ford to produce model T's for only a cople hundred people a decade just so they are garage decoration. Seriously, it isn't going to happen unless there is ROI.

Most of you obviously don't run any real or serious business of any kind. If you had, you guys would not waste someone's who is running an actual business with no viable business plan.

Have or does any of you actually work for a serious company with lead managing roles of projects and project proposals. Try being more serious next time with a real proposal with seious investigation on return on investment.

Commodore USA is a business not a hobby shop.

I am not saying if I agree with Barry on everything. I don't but at least there is something.

To the dumbass who made a comment about forgetting a fan and referencing that person's 12 year old. geez, you know, that 12 year old had a captive instruction as in the child is doing what you tell the child to do vs. Doing anything on his or her own or on any real full education on computer science. The child is just getting one person's perspective and view.

Factors not considered might be.... The low power usage modes and subsequent heat emissions of the hardware. Netbook hardware without high power draw cpu? Wow....

Each cpu has a certain amount of energy efficiency of input energy and loss emitted as heat due to inefficiency. That is back to basic physics 101. It might not need a fan in the c64x. Given the bulky size and air space and energy efficiency of board chips and their thermal emission. If you done the research, it probably not that big an issue.

I read alot of emotional b.s. Nonsense throughout this thread.

I wish you guys grow up somewhat. Especially the ones demanding the most ridiculous claims.

You can prop yourselves like a bunch of walking phallics or you can provide reasonable solutions that makes sense in a practical functional business.

CMD left over a decade ago. That was the last real business supporting Commodore 8 bit from a development standpoint. jens is close and so is some but they are more quasi-business and hobby. Jens, I am not claiming your skill as hobbyist but your Commodore/Amiga business is somewhere between full fledge business and a hobby using your professional knowledge in hardware engineering but I doubt you are naive to make your living on Commodore and Amiga these days.

My point for the rest of you, how long would great guys like Jens and Jim and others be able to do this and to what extent. I am sure some of these guys could use some degree of support financially to offset some of their hard labor cost. I think that maybe an option if Barry considers it and if it is done in a manner acceptable to all parties.

Some of that is reasonable but that may or may not be out of Commodore USA, LLC. Business budget but maybe out of some personal money. The biggest thing is, would both sides be willing to come to the table in a civil manner with intelligent and professional quality planning.

Simply put, if you guys just knock off the silly crap then great. If you were employees and I was the CEO and I got this kind of response.... It would be hard pressed for me to not give most of you the pink slip.

PS: I am not one to sugar coat my point that much.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 10:53:14 PM by Wildstar128 »
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2012, 11:15:13 PM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;690725
Actually, some of us remember the Amiga for (get this) being a really neat design in both hardware and software, not for giving Amiga owners a bigger e-penis than PC owners. I don't really care what clock speed is or isn't attained, I'd just like to see a new computer that's a worthy follow-up to what was really an amazingly elegant system for its day.

So? The exact same can be said about nearly everybody else in this community. It's not like Barry was present on the mountain with Carl Sassenrath and Dave Haynie for the Transfiguration of Jay Miner. How does this make him any more qualified to do anything Amiga-related than anybody else here?


Uh, wait, we "don't buy new hardware?" How is it that the first run of  the X1000 sold out and they're doing a second run, then? Unless you mean  we don't buy new hardware that's assembled from stock PC components  we could get for less than half the cost, perhaps?

What's your criteria for a "real business?"


So? Doesn't mean we're obligated to agree with or approve of the doings of any random schmoe who's shelled out to Bill McEwen.

I'll remind you that this whole thing was Barry's idea. He asked for  questions and we gave him questions; if they weren't the questions he  wanted, that's his problem.


To your specific questions...

What is a criteria for a real business ? A real business is one that provides goods and/or services. A real business is also one that operates on the basis of making a profit. A real business is one that professionally evaluates their investments and the return on investments. A real business is one that is about making a living for the owners and where they have employees, provide appropriate wages and salaries to their employees. It is in the same sense as a serious, real job that you take seriously for your living.

A real business is not one that is just for donating your time for joy. Programming for free and using pseudo-business names.... Not real. Fake and just for fun vs. Having any serious backbone and structure. Real Businesses doesn't have to be boring but they do have to be for serious intent. They have to be more then just a weekend jerking off time.

It is subjective and objective. There is objective framework of a business that is for real the. One that is not b.s.ing and nothing. There is some degree of subjective degree.

I think you are twisting the details. In any case, I am not going to waist my time arguing it. It is fair to ask questions but if you are going to be taken seriously use your good judgment in asking questions that isn't stupid.

Barry is a little loose with his mouth sometimes in how he phrases things. If it was me, I would have phrased it with a little more tighter phrasing such as serious, legitimate and sensible questions worthy of responding and worthy of asking and command serious proposals with some serious data to back your proposal if you propose something.

Like business. If I was Barry, I would command that if you want Commodore USA to go about a proposal then bring up a serious proposal with supporting data and be ready for serious critique of the proposal. Where is the money? What is the ROI? Did you plan for media and publications costs for advertising product to get it known. How many are demanding such.

Barry is the "Jack Tramiel" of Commodore USA. Try proposing proposals as if you were proposing to Jack Tramiel. You might get more traction with your proposals, guys.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2012, 11:16:43 PM »
Quote from: Duce;690734
Gotcha.

You are selling modern PC's branded as Amiga's.  We understand that, we all read Barry's Q & A.  We don't need the business school lecture on financial viability, C-USA has stated they will not be supporting the "purist" market at all.  What's left to discuss?  I thought all the fanboys would be off selling these to people that actually CARE.  In your eyes, you might as well be trying to sell glasses of water to drowning men.  

We get it.  We're the guys stuck in the past, the guys that "just don't understand" in your view.  Why you still here?  How much bad press does one company need?

Once again, we aren't interested.  If we wanted commodity PC's, we'd build our own or buy them from Dell or Best Buy.

I can buy the exact same case as the Amiga Mini for $50 tops any day of the week and assemble it with similar components for far less money if that is the footprint of PC that I want.  Not everyone is capable of that, and I recommend you preach to the proper choir, namely your target market.  We are not your target market.

I'm not selling them. In addition, you might want to know how business operates if you suggest or propose ideas for someone to invest their money.

That would be a good start for you guys. Take some courses in business and run a business.

It might do you some good in your life as well.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 11:19:34 PM by Wildstar128 »
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2012, 11:42:04 PM »
Quote from: Darrin;690733
Well your posting style at 3am after a night on the town exactly matches Barry's style at midday after a cup of coffee.  An easy mistake to make.  ;)



I have put my money where my mouth is.  Over the last couple of years I've purchased Keyrahs, RTG cards, SDFFs, card readers, Amiga/C64 Forever, a Chameleon64, a C-One, a Minimig and ARM board, an FPGA Aracde and pre-ordered an X1000.

What have you done?

I've bought several PCs too, but I got them from HP.  More powerful than C-USA can do and a fraction of the price.  My C64 Forever and Amiga Forever still run on them though.



Yeah, expecting Barry to just bugger off and sell some PCs is unrealistic.  However, we live in hope.



If this was "wasting pages" then we would be posting on CommodoreAmiga.net.  This is the site we have all used for years to discuss the Amiga variations.  C-USA insist on coming here and posting rubbish and as we're here we feel the need to respond.  If they're not interested in what we think then they should stop posting here.  They keep telling us we're not their target customers so why on Earth do they keep coming back?



Better than that, I don't need to spend a penny on R&D because others (MikeJ, aCube, Hyperion, Indivision, etc) are already doing it and have been for years.  I just by the finished products as I pointed out above.


It might not have been in the last couple of years but in the past 20-30 years, I bought commodore 64s (6502 based ones not the 64x), Vic-20s, c-128, plus/4, cmd fd-2000, jiffydos, amiga 500 (2), amiga 1200 (well, got that one for free), Commodore PC-10, C-One, C64DTV and Hummer. I bought several peripherals, light pens, printers, etc.

In addition, I have been involved in the Commodore community for some time now. I am not against you guys using the old hardware but by and large, most of you don't buy in sufficient volume for sustaining businesses. Why do you think CMD left?

Do you think CMD scale or larger hardware developer business can be a sustainable business.

I'll ask you a serious question, would any of you buy new commodore 64 software on the various peripherals like maybe an intelligent drive that runs on ethernet and you use the various ethernet modules to load the software off of.

Basically a simply pico-itx board, some drives and NIC and just hook it into the network and it can be used on classic and new Commodore/Amiga branded computer products.

Would you guys support such hw with a DVD or Blu-Ray Burner, HD and have it as a peripheral that you can have more advance hardware and software on large media that you can use. Would you guys support something like that?

The hw isn't that important per se. Just that is provide mass media inexpensively through your existing software. If we can support something like MMC/SD media for a front-end firmware to communicate to such external devices and load software.... Like a front end DOS commands that would communicate to "network devices".

Would you support such?

This can be C= 8 bit and classic Amiga and in principle any of the PPC. There are other hw issues but I'll leave it at that as concept and the nuts & bolts for later.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2012, 11:44:43 PM »
Quote from: Pyromania;690738
@Wildstar128

Do you consider Amiga Inc a serious business?


They spent the money on purchasing the IP. As for serious business, not recently but we have laws and they own the rights. That is another debate. Lets not go into that one... It is a distraction.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2012, 11:51:52 PM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;690740
Individual Computers does that. Amigakit does that. Softhut does that. Vesalia does that.


Amigakit does that. Softhut does that. Vesalia does that. (I think Individual Computers does that, but Jens can feel free to correct me if he's only breaking even.)


Amigakit does that. Softhut does that. Vesalia does that. (I don't know if  Individual Computers does that.)
 

Given that CUSA was started on the back of Barry's furniture business and does not disclose the number or salary of its employees, how do you know they meet this criteria?


Given that CUSA does not disclose the details of its financials and whether the company is self-supporting, how do you know they meet this criteria?

Ok, softhut is a serious business and vesalia and Amigakit. Ok fair enough. However, small retail business still survive but even fewer are hardware developer or producer business. That is what is harder. Hardware producers like CommodoreUSA involve more overhead than retailers but they don't have the extent of R&D investment for designing custom hardware. The CMDs and most custom hw developers are more or less out of the scene except a few like Jens but I doubt he really makes profit as he mainly is making his material cost per unit but not his actual time's worth. I don't think he broke even on Chameleon or C-One and several others products from the sales. Then, jens can make the corrections so guys don't take what I said about him as fact.

As for any of them..... I don't think any of them discloses their employer or business costs. That is none of our business anyway.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2012, 11:55:58 PM by Wildstar128 »
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2012, 12:28:21 AM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;690739
I agree completely. The Amiga can't compete in the cutthroat, pure-commodity modern PC market. (Which is why it's silly to put together a $1300 PC, label it "Amiga," and charge $2500 for it.) But who says it has to? The last time the Amiga was really competing for general personal-computer market share (let alone dominance) was some time around 1990 - since then it's been an entirely separate and self-contained market. The people buying Amiga today are buying it because they like it for what it is, not because they're looking for a modern PC. Suggesting that producing new Amiga-based systems is stupid because they can't compete with modern PCs is like saying Kawasaki should get out of the motorcycle business because their bikes can't carry as much as a Chevy Suburban or go as fast as a Ferrari.

Got any numbers to back that claim up? (Particularily considering they've only had their main product line available for about a year?)

...wha...? What does this have to do with anything at all?

Why? Hundreds of thousands of people aren't going to buy Amiga, no matter what we do. That time has passed. If we can't take back the market, why settle for mediocre cloning of what the industry is already doing when we could be doing something interesting?

I'm still not clear on how producing PC clones at X1000 prices that no sane person would ever buy and hoping that a brand name rented from Uncle Bill will sell it counts as real/serious/actual business.

Are we employees? Do we get paid for doing things for you or Barry? If not, I see precious little reason to care whether you or he are made unhappy by our disapproval.

I probably can look at some numbers that were released and figure the money cost and extrapolate gross revenues from sales prices. However, I can't say it is the totals but I can say they they are closer to CMD in their early to mid 90s days given the larger venue.

Jens, jim brain and most of the hw developer 'businesses' don't add up in gross revenues.

How does Amiga Mini sell.... Well... At the pricing... I can guess it would sell when it has an i7 quad core processor and 16 GB RAM and high end GPUs is about twice the clock rate, twice the number of cores and and faster sysyem bus for DDR3 not DDR2 memory and SATA3 sockets... And you have an OS that has more mainstream software immediately functional right from get go.

The OS has a big part to do with whether the product has commercial viability in the mainstream. Linux is strong and viable and in fact Linus Torvald started with Commodore and I suspect he was strongly influenced by C64, Amiga and other system over the years.

There is no sense reinventing the wheel in OS matters or starting with something with little real software development in the application area in 20 years. There is plenty of developer tools and art paint tools and some vector graphic tools but not much beyond what a few hundred active amiga commuity demands or produces for themselves which is maybe a few dozen sw devs with a few interest areas and that was the software they got.

The biggest problem with AmigaOS is it lacks mainstream viability because there isn't the apps and the Amiga operating system is largely outdated. Mainstream Computer users don't want to program software. There is little interest in sw developing. Linux is reasonably sensible in that it not only has software developers and companies already on the platform, there is also a vast array of commercial grade software for almost everyone. The only lacking area is MMORPG but even then, not an issue as the developers actually use Linux machines but simply target development of their games to Windows and it is easy enough to make it Linux or Mac or they can simply multiboot and then run it. It is already there.

People don't have to wait days, weeks or months or years waiting for some dev to develop at their snail ass pace. There is even JOBS for Linux. That is the point. People aren't going to spend have a second to consider your product if your product doesn't serve their needs out of book or a simple online purchase oft with immediate download. They aren't going to wait years for someone to get something done.

Even if you buy your own PC, you can download COS-V and have a decent linux distro with the C= flavor from get go if you felt like it.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2012, 12:38:40 AM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;690748
They don't produce anything. They put together PCs out of commodity parts and have, on one occasion, gone so far as to purchase injection-molded cases from a factory that does custom molding.


I agree that they're not obligated to tell us, but that doesn't answer the question of how you know that CUSA even meets your own stated criteria.


Ok, semantics.... I was using produce to differentiate from develop. They produce just as much as many of the PC computer brands that don't actually produce the motherboard themselves but get special OEM boards for their product and assemble into their own cases.

Dell doesn't even manufacturer their motherboards. So producing in the sense of a complete product package. Just like a car producer that uses a chassis from on manufactuerer, engine of another and just produce their on body and cosmetics.

Lets put it like this, they don't absolutely have to have employees but when they have, they pay them. As far as I know, Leo is an employee and is paid. If he wasn't, I would think he be gone. They have people that work at the communication. As a company with employees, you must pay your employees. I am sure it can be ascertained under public information requests through the proper government entities and get the picture.

Having employees is not an absolute to my standard. If that was misunderstood, I apologize for not being clear enough.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2012, 12:50:08 AM »
Quote from: runequester;690747
What did they "develop" other than a case?


Lets put it blunt, you wouldn't make anything custom remotely competitive in mainstream without great expense. The hw platform wars in the mainstream computer market is over. It is completely x86. Intel won. PPC, ARM, and everyone else lost. It is like the vhs winning out over beta. Intel is the ISA for mainstream computers. Apple was the last company of mainstream computers to use PPC and they dropped it. This means, intel ISA is the architecture of today and for the foreseeable future until quantum computing comes out.

PPC lost that market just as the 65xx did and 65xx uses the embedded devices market.

Lets be serious.

When it comes to mainstream computers:
You can have any flavor of cpu as long as it is x86 ISA platform.

You can love or hat x86 but that is what you got now.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2012, 12:58:11 AM »
Quote from: Tripitaka;690755
Fair enough, we all have bad days. I still think CUSA is an irrelevance as far as anything Amiga is concerned. They have the name but none of the spirit.


I am not going to argue on that point as it isn't needed and is simply a point of view. I agree it doesn't have direct relevence with Classic Amiga platform. Just as much as modern mac has to 68k Mac.

I do believe they can capture some of the Amiga essence. Now, lets take a look at the underlying framework of Amiga kernal. Isn't it some sort of framework built off of UNIX to some degree but certainly divergent in a massive way.

We can look into the detailed history of the Amiga OS development history at the beginning.

It just might have something to do with that baseline which Linux is also derived from.
 

Offline Wildstar128

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 74
    • Show all replies
Re: CommodoreUSA CEO Interview Answers
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2012, 01:07:36 AM »
Quote from: runequester;690757
I know this is probably heresy to the hardcore amiga guys, but I actually don't care about the processor other than "fast or slow". Im not a programmer at all, so I have no real idea what the differences really are.

My question was.. what did CUSA develop, that anyone else have not done?


I can't say that they done anything that anyone else couldn't do. I would say that they had done some customize scripting in the COS-V and all but lets keep in mind that Commodore USA is only just beginning. Commodore business machines was well established by 1975 and 1980s. They had 20 years. So, it would be difficult to get the more advance and more custom UI and other features to further customize COS-V into something with its own flavor. Developing a desktop environment that is totally custom would require R&D.

If you are interested and have some ideas and skills for a custom desktop environment... Then maybe that would be something to consider that is revolutionary but functional and intuitive.

It is possible to capture that spirit in a way that Amiga did in 1984.