Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"  (Read 5835 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline System

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 199
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org
Re: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"
« on: August 16, 2002, 12:11:15 AM »
"Isnt as fast as intels?? Mhz dosent mean a crap, i have a 1800mhz P4 sitting here and an old ahtlon 1.4ghz and guess what?? The athlon is WAY faster, even though the p4 has way higher mhz + even higher front side bus."

The P4 will trash the athlon at encoding etc .. why because of improvements and not just uping the core speed like AMD.

"When they say the XP2000 is faster than intel, then they arent lying at all, its actually way faster."

Intel think more about feature then speed for games like AMD , features like decent heat protection ... and the IA64 platform being a new , fresh platform unlike the previous X86 kludge and AMDs attempt.

My mate being a uni geek reads tech docs , he read the Intel ones for the P4 and found a new respect for the so called arseholes of the CPU market ... I'm not saying their gods , but they are advancing instead of just speeding up.
 

Offline System

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 199
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org
Re: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2002, 05:13:40 AM »
Yeah their nameing convention is stupid.
they 'SAY" its a powermark relative to the t-birds that didnt have SSE2.....but we all know its to show relative performance to intel cpu's......
now that haveing been said.
The clawhammer is a 3400+
The P4 is a 3000mhz P4
(a fair benchmark would be to benchmark a Clawhammer 3000+ against the P4 at 3000mhz since AMD's useing this power rateing instead of mhz in this rateing their faster chip beats the P4 yeah but its not compareing a 3400mhz P4 to it)
Also dont forget that AMD's Clawhammer is 64bit that Intel P4 is 32bit...that fact that the gap is so small considering the AMD is both 64bit and 400 power rateing points ahead with such a small lead looks bad.

and Whabang's right AMD chips are not ramping up fast enough.
I went with AMD until the P4 northwood came out then i swtichted to a P4...the reason bieng i use Lightwave..and i wanted a cooler more quiet solution.
I got what i asked for. The P4 runs much cooler then my old AMD Athlon 1.2ghz did. and the price wasnt to bad considering i took a 1.8ghz P4 and ramped it to 2ghz without even changeing the cooling.
300$ cpu for 180$...gotta love it

I go for what i see is better at any given time. I'm not a person that gets stuck to one cpu or one platform. The first two generations of P4 sucked. This generation is great in my opinon. the micron process..the cooling needed...the non-delicate cpu...the speed is good ...and the apps i use are P4 apps.
Athlons are good and so are P4's ......I just prefer P4's because i was getting tired of my every shrinking office turning into a sweat shop heh.
 

Offline System

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 199
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org
Re: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2002, 06:24:32 AM »
also shows how pathetic the power4 is hahahahahah 800.,...omg...hahahaha
 

Offline System

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2003
  • Posts: 199
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org
Re: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2002, 12:52:01 AM »
well, how about this link: titanium vs clawhammer?
   http://www.vr-zone.com/#2593

/stone