Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Cybervision64  (Read 2919 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show all replies
Re: Cybervision64
« on: June 18, 2004, 09:54:09 PM »
Hi Morley

check your e-mail.

Bye

 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show all replies
Re: Cybervision64
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2004, 11:30:15 AM »
Hi Morley

have you noticed a speed gain with the new setting?

Here not noticeable gain.

. . . and if you are under P96, can you check with P96Speed, the "RectFill() Pattern" test at 640x480 at 8bit?

Here i have a very slooow speed (better on CGX).

Ciao

 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show all replies
Re: Cybervision64
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2004, 04:08:45 PM »
Mellot i hope that :-)

I was speaking about using CV64 with Buster9 or 11 . .  . eh!



 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show all replies
Re: Cybervision64
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2004, 09:09:27 AM »
Hi all

i've used P96 with CV64 (4MB model) for a life and it is the best choise for this card IMHO.

Now i've switched to CGX4.3 due an upgrade to the CVPPC (not installed yet) and in some operation, CGX "seems" faster but less "system friendly".

For the viewer, i use CyberWindow, Cyberview and even MysicView for 68K and ShowPPC or ppc datatypes for PPC.

All the above with Both RTG system.

Only CyberAnim, works a lot better if used with CGX.

Ciao

 

Offline Framiga

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 4096
    • Show all replies
Re: Cybervision64
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2004, 09:41:21 AM »
Hi elendil

it is a little bit difficult for me, to give an "absolute" feedback about the 2 RTGs systems because, i've just upgraded from a 040 to a PPC+060.

When (for a life) i had the 040, P96 was the best choise for the CV64 (CGX was terrible slow with MagicMenu and WB background fill).

Now with the 060, all seems better with CGX 4.3 but, as already said, is even a taste issue.

Ciao

BTW- anyway i HATE the sloooow WB fill BKG pattern of CGX

I hope with CVPPC will be better :-)