Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Star Trek: Countdown  (Read 3551 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TrevTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1550
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Star Trek: Countdown
« on: April 03, 2009, 09:41:38 AM »
Has anyone read the Star Trek: Countdown comic lead-in to the new film? Does anyone agree that it's a steaming turd of a funny book written by gushing Trek fanboys with no story-telling ability? Every panel is a TNG reunion shot, every line a cliché.

I have high hopes for the new film. Let's hope their shooting script is better than their lead-in concept.
 

Offline TrevTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1550
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Star Trek: Countdown
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2009, 12:18:58 AM »
The new Trek film appears to be splitting the Trek universe into two (well, three including Mirror, Mirror, four if you count the changes introduced by First Contact, five if you think Voyage Home changed things, and even more if you consider the novels canon) distinct timelines: pre-JJ Trek and post-JJ Trek.

Although, Trek can't seem to make up its mind re: time travel. They've used both the classic, causal closed-loop view of time, and the quantum, multiverse view of time.

I actually think DS9 was the strongest of all the series story-wise. It certainly had the best character development of the four--including some of the most memorable guest characters (Brunt--FCA.), thanks to Jeffrey Combs--although the TOS movies really brought the Kirk-Spock-Bones relationship home.

I really enjoyed what they tried to do with Enterprise during the last season, and as always, Jeffrey Combs really shined in his guest spots (as Shran).

I think with the new film, we'll see the same {bleep}y, impetuousness we love about Kirk only without the Shatner whimsy. I can't wait to see what Karl Urban does with Bones. DeForest Kelley was awesome, and it's going to be difficult to bring the same subtle heart and selfless passion to the character. (Or maybe not. DeForest was really just playing an Old West town doc crossed with a Civil War field doc.)

EDIT:

And I thought Nemesis was about as interesting as dirt, unfortunately. I really wanted a decent Romulan story, too. Maybe that's what JJ will deliver, although there's not much left of the Romulan Empire post-Countdown.

Now that I think about it, that's what I *really* wanted from Enterprise. The energy of TNG with a DS9-style drama involving Earth, Vulcan, Romulus, and Andoria. Less let's-go-kill-the-bad-guys and more birth-of-the-Federation.

Fortunately, Battlestar Galactica has filled that gap quite nicely.
 

Offline TrevTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1550
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Star Trek: Countdown
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2009, 05:51:47 AM »
I think Battlestar Galactica has done what all SF readers know and television producers forgot: Good science (read: speculative) fiction is story driven. If the visual effects don't serve to advance the story, they're unnecessary.

Galactica has had its faults, particularly with pacing during the last two seasons, but it's still better than anything else out there.

Anyway, let's hope JJ and company have realized that and have not demoted Star Trek to two hours of shakey cam nausea.
 

Offline TrevTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1550
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Star Trek: Countdown
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2009, 06:11:00 AM »
Ain't It Cool News http://www.aintitcool.com has lots of reviews post-surprise-screening-in-Austin last night. I'm not reading the spoiler ones, but everything is positive so far. Getting a bit geeky excited.