@Paul
Well there is only one way they can rig it, and that is the selection process.
I can see three possible alternatives:
#1 Questions get selected that won't offend Fleecy because if he is offended the Q+A might cease and it draws publicity and hits to the site.
#2 Questions get selected that Fleecy sayes he can answer, so whilst at the height of the criticism ( that only the easy questions are selected) ( but only easy ones were being asked for a while because we were all trying to work out how far we could go in our questioning before they were not selected ) some of the more negative questions were put for a week. Now that has been done they can say "see look we did what you asked".
#3 Questions get selected that do not create adverse publicity for Amiga Inc.
@Warface
According to Hyperion, AOS4 is protected in the contract. I see no reason why they would lie about that. It is possible that the contract is not failsafe but being in different countries helps - you can get protection behind geographical legal boundaries. ;-)
@All
You must remember that for a long time now we have had just peoples word to go by in order to judge the situation. Some people have taken a certain type of "word" ( say anti-Amiga Inc ) as truth without question, some people have taken another type of "word" as truth without question ( say pro-Amiga Inc ) and others ( like me and most of you ) think about who the source is, why they would say that and what the possible alternatives are. It may cloud the truth a bit while the possible alternatives are discussed and eliminated but its better than being a B*F where *=faction.
