Acill wrote:
Well I have been looking at the MOs/Pegasos system over the AmigaOne system a lot. I think the MOS solution has a huge advantage Over the new OS4 when/if it ever gets released.
Thats your choice, what you think, as a consumer. But why broadcast it to the world?
1. MOS is out now, and is getting a lot of new developers on to it NOW.
Yes, a public beta MOS is out now, and is getting a lot of existing Amiga developers moving to it now. But there is no reason to suggest that in vast quantities they will be exclusive to one system or another.
Away from the cameras there are a large number of developers working on stuff for AOS4.
So in my view its six of one and half a dozen of another.
2. The price for a FASTER and more capable Pegasos II is much better then the current A1 systems out, if you can even find one.
Can you point a link out where you can buy a Pegasos 2?
3. From what I have seen MOS just looks awsome! It started out PPC and has a lot of time in the real world getting bugs removed.
Im sorry I fail to see any logical rationale in the above. Are you saying that AOS4 doesn't look awesome? Awesome is subjective, some people find Mazda MX-5s awesome, I don't.
Starting out PPC? What bits? When? Are you talking about Quark? I fail to see how such a claim ( which is an innaccurate generalisation at best ) can be considered an advantage without providing the logical crux of your argument.
AOS4 is spending a lot of time getting real world use and having bugs removed, over a year at least.
All in all if I had to choose today, I think I would go the MOS route.
Well bully. Next time I buy a new car Ill post my buying preferences on international networks ;-)
I have been an Amiga user since way back in 1989 when I got an A100, then an A3000 and still use that system today. How do you all feel about this? Do you think Amiga Inc is going to be hurt by the time between the two OS systems release dates?
Q1. I feel nothing about your Amiga using history.
Q2. No.
