Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?  (Read 13181 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jiffy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 474
    • Show all replies
    • http://clausewitz.nl
Re: What was the Best and Worst Amiga Models?
« on: October 14, 2003, 06:37:51 PM »
Ok, my list of favourites:

#1: A1200. Compact and yet easily expandable.
#2: A2000. Built like a tank. EXPANDABILITY!!!
#3: A3000D. Standard SCSI & FF. And a lovely case...
#4: A4000T. Repairs flaws of the A4000D. Easy to upgrade.
#5: A3000T. Easier to upgrade compared to the 'D'-model.
#6: A500(+). The right computer at the right time. Upgrades are plentifull, but take a hideous amount of deskspace.
#7: A4000D. Castrated design. But hey, it's fast and it has AGA.
#8: A1000. Hard to upgrade, but it's where it all started...
#9: A600. Compact but hard to upgrade.

At the moment, I have both the A1200 and the A2000. The A1200 is heavily expanded, but still in its original housing (with a four drive SCSI-tower, though). The A2000 has some uogrades to make life a little easier, nothing more.

I didn't mention the CDTV or the CD32, as I don't think of them as being 'complete' Amiga computers and therefor don't fit in with the list above.

As a sidenote, I'ld like to add that I like all the models I mentioned above, but this is my list of personal favorites. I would love to have all of them, but hey, lack of space...
Life sucks. Then you die. Then they throw mud in your face. Then you get eaten by worms. Be happy it happens in that order... My Amiga 1200