>Law firm works for Investor, not Investee
Hi
In my opinion, Amiga Inc is part of Netventures assets.
The main part of an IT company asset is its IP.
If CMS Derks defend Amiga Inc IP, they actually defend the asset of Netventures.
I don't understand why they don't help Amiga Inc.
Perhaps one of the reason: their lawyers do not have any experience with laws in the States.
If Genesi really get the AmigaDE trademark, perhaps Sharp, Nokia or even Microsoft can get the same trade mark, based on their agreement with Amiga Inc.
Perhaps they can force Amiga Inc to port AmigaDE to various new products.
On the court document (from merlancia.us), the judge did not mention trademark or upgrade.
Is there any other documents about the judgment?
Thx.
