Hello,
There is a serious credibility problem with Garry Hare. If you want to attract Investors, don't lie or try to fool them with fake identity.
Amiga Inc, KMOS are IT companies, therefore website IS IMPORTANT.
Perhaps Garry Hare can fool investors for 1 week by quoting delay in website update, but after 1 week NOBODY would believe him.
Does Garry Hare know how to search Internet using Google or other search engines?
What Amiga Inc really need (at that time) is a good CFO and financial plan/ strategy to rescue the company and convince investors, NOT by just changing the CEO.
New CEO may help if the new CEO is from a powerful financial group (who buy Amiga Inc and pay alll debt), but such CEO did not need any new Investors.
When the whole fake card blow up, it's better for Garry Hare and Amiga Inc to make joint statement and post the explanation on Amiga Inc website.
>KMOS - Name
It's strange that a CEO CANNOT EXPLAIN the meaning of the name of his own company. Can he change the name to something else or ask the person who coined / created the name? Is he IN CONTROL at the creation of the company?
BTW XEROX is from Xerography (see dictionary).
EDSEL came from "Excel".
>Future - Asia
If Garry Hare / KMOS can port Classic or new AmigaOS to V-Dragon CPU with Transmeta 68K code morphing, it will be a great news.
>Bill McEwen statements in the court (under oath)
1. Amiga Inc is the owner of AmigaOS IP.
(August 2003). Why ITEC or KMOS did not inform the judge about transfer of IP ownership?
2. I am not the CEO of Amiga Inc
(One of the labour case). Who is the REAL Amiga Inc CEO at that time? Can Garry Hare explain this matter? Is there any court documents about this statement?
>Fleecy Q&A.
Why Garry Hare/Kmos or ITEC did not stop Fleecy Moss from making statements/promise about the future of AmigaOS, when Moss/Amiga Inc is no longer the owner? Does Garry Hare/KMOS approve and still follow Fleecy Moss plan for future AmigaOS?
