Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: BBC, Bhopal and Dow Scam  (Read 2683 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline asian1Topic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1359
    • Show all replies
BBC, Bhopal and Dow Scam
« on: December 04, 2004, 04:02:14 AM »
Hi
BBC News was fooled by 2 members of "YES MEN" scam team.
They setup fake WWW.DOW-CHEMICAL.COM and pretend to be representative of Dow Chemical Inc, the buyer of Union Carbide Inc, the ownner of Bhopal chemical plant that exploded in 1984.

The YES MEN team said that Dow Chemical plant to pay compesation to all victims and clean up the mess at Bhopal.

This fake statement cause the crash of Dow shares in the US market and celebration in Bhopal.

The REAL Dow Chemical Inc release statement that:
1. The 2 men does not work for Dow Chemical and does not represent Dow Chemical.
2. Bhopal accident is caused by sabotage, and the plant owner is Union Carbide India, not Union Carbide Inc (International). Therefore Dow (the new owner of Union Carbide) IS NOT RESPONSIBLE for the accidents and WILL NOT pay the compesation and clean up charges.

Is this a cruel joke?
Why BBC News did not check the real DOW website?
(WWW.DOW.COM)
Why Dow Chemical did not buy the domain of the fake website, to prevent various problems / scams?
 

Offline asian1Topic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1359
    • Show all replies
Re: BBC, Bhopal and Dow Scam
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2004, 01:05:55 PM »
>European company in US - No clean up

Hi
IMO Indian Government should launch new lawsuits with support from UN and US EPA.
The plant in Bhopal was build by Union Carbide India based on technology & safety standard from Union Carbide International.
UC Int'l also train UC India technicians and engineers about various safety measure in plant operation.

If the Safety procedure & safety training cannot provide enough backup to prevent the explosion, the it's the Union Carbide Int'l fault.

On the Indian court, the "sabotage" theory was rejected, based on various testimony. The accident is caused by negligence, lack of training and experience. Apparently UC Int'l did not provide enough training and instruction about the safety and emergency procedure on the plant.

Not as dramatic as Bhopal, but ABB run into problems because their Asbestos related product in US:

http://www.forbes.com/global/2003/0106/019_print.html

=================================================

When ABB acquired Combustion Engineering, a U.S. maker of power plant equipment, in 1990, the European industrial company knew that there were outstanding asbestos lawsuits. But after it ran the numbers, the risk seemed manageable. After all, Combustion Engineering wasn't mining or manufacturing asbestos; it was only selling boilers with asbestos insulation. It was hardly on the front lines of asbestos litigation.
It is now. ABB faces U.S. asbestos liabilities estimated to be from $2 billion to $3 billion. The company is trying to put that unit into bankruptcy to protect itself from claims that are already far in excess of Combustion Engineering's assets of $812 million. ABB has paid out $1 billion in claims and is trying to cap the unit's future liability at $1.1 billion.