Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Official reply by elbox: Mediator PCI2AGP  (Read 5915 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: Official reply by elbox: Mediator PCI2AGP
« on: January 18, 2004, 08:53:16 AM »
Quote

AmiDelf wrote:
On my MediatorPCI 4000 there is a 66MHz crystal infact.


.... and infact, I have an 28MHz crystal on my A2000, and you can find ones up
to 80MHz on 040-cards .....

Quote
And another thing. Hyperion got a SharkPPC developer card.


Says who ?

Quote

ELBOX claims that AmigaOS4 will work without problems,


Elbox claims lots of things, thruth is (allmost) allways a different matter.

Quote

 but will it? Sure!


Good to see that there is still a lot of faith in the guillable.

Quote

 Its all up to Hyperion now.


Doesn't that contradict earlier statements, that it would run the A1-version without
problems (unchanged even). And don't forget that Hyperion have allready buried
themselves in work for atleast another 2 years (outstanding OS4-feature/bugs,
game-licences and so on).

Quote

With SharkPPC, your Classic Amiga turns to a G4 PPC machine, with AmigaOS4 support! Enjoy!


Nope, with (a working ....) Shark, your classic (how I hate that term) will be reduced
to some useless PCBs only there to stop the think from falling apart (accessing
the chips through PCI, the Voodoo-mem-window, and Z3/A1200-slot ?

Gotta be kidding.
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else
 

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: Official reply by elbox: Mediator PCI2AGP
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2004, 01:19:22 PM »
@lempkee

Got any factual arguments against my post, or is it just that you again can't stand
pointing the obvious flaws/misconceotions in someone's daydreams ?
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else