Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: MOS: back to the future  (Read 13590 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: MOS: back to the future
« Reply #14 from previous page: October 06, 2002, 02:32:26 AM »
@Alkemyst

See it the other way:

BPlan had been cooperating with epic and Titan even before they
had finished the mATX-design (remember the dual-ZIF-version), and
at one point Titan may have said "we think there is a market for a real-
time video editor, and we want to write one". What was bPlan's
reaction ? Something like " cost next to nothing as it is allready in
the southbridge".  Sure it would/could have happen as an PCI-addon,
but that would have taken more time, and MotionStudio would have
been more expensive for the costumer since they would have needed a FW-
card for it. Everyone who buys a board and than thinks about video, will
only need to buy the SW to get thinks going.

Porting MotionStudio to OS4 id impossible as as there is no working
FW-solution, and I don't see anybody starting on it.

For your examples:
CD-ROM were introduced by C= (CDTV)
GFX-cards were custom (expensive) Zorro-cards that needed SW. This SW
could later easily be reused for PCI-cards.

A ZIP-drive is just standard Unit handled by the device of a custom
SCSI (or IDE) controller. No extra SW needed.

Soundcards did start the same way as GFX-card, but in this case
someone later wrote a free and general SW (AHI) for them, but still
there would never be any support for if some companies didn't
sell the HW.

The only realistic way of adding FW to OS4 (other than in the OS
itself) is dongeling the card in the same way as the Spider is, and thats
something that simply sucks !
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else
 

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: MOS: back to the future
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2002, 05:26:07 AM »
@Elektro

 :lol:  :lol:

Not "never" but later, just like the MIDI/Atari problem  and that was
the reason why the Amiga never played an important role for proffessinal
musicians. Those who are still using a Amiga or Draco for proffessinal
video (mostly smal companies doing wedding-movies or so) want
to replace their aging systems with something that allows them to use
(parts of) their existing SW, and I don't think they will care about
the name-badge. That market will allready be lost when someone finally
decides to write such a SW for OS4.
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else