KMOS and Amiga Inc Debt Settlement

[Kronos]

kgrach wrote:
All you seem to be interested is in  posting this FUD on as many sites as possible.

No thats not FUD (maybe you should reread the definition of what "FUD" actually stands for), it isn't even trolling.

It is the most important question regarding KMOS-AInc:

Are they gonna be a respectable company, or is it just the old sh## in a new bag ?

[Kronos]

Wayne wrote:

Aha!  But here's the real question...  Do we know that Amiga Inc was not (at least legally) dissolved before it's assets were presumed by KMOS?

Wayne

Dunno bout the US, but here (and probraly any other country that wants to have a working economy) this would require some court-paper-work, also known as bancrups or insolvence to make sure no creditors get shafted.

This normally done by auctioning/selling those parts of the company off that are still worth some, just as it happened with C= and later Escom.

@cecilia
I see no reason to trust BBRV, but I also see non to believe Mr Hare either.

The obscure way the IP got transfered, his rather cluless interviews, the t-shirts that were delivered months after he claimed them to be produced and no the obviously faked AInc-address all paint a picture that he is just another member of the "bunch", an honory "Bill" so to speak  :-P

Now to that card:
Scenario 1:
GH is choosen as new AInc-CEO by Netventures, he hands out the cards in expectation of what he thinks just as formal details. BBRV somehow finds out about the new CEO and gets his hands on a card. GH/Netventures for some reason decide that the Itec/KMOS-detour needs to be taken.

Scenario 2:
GH hands out these cards just as teaser, BBRV gets trapped and the rest of the red-bunch (fleecy,McBill,HMetal) stay on the sideline putting more fuel into fire instead of clearing things up.

Now somehow scenario 1 sounds more reasonable (which offcourse doesn't mean it's true).

[Kronos]

@cecilia
I was refering to this:

I don't think that "business card fiasco" did anything to dirty the good reputation of Garry Hare. He's not the one that lied about it. He made a card to give to friend's and acquantences.

Where it seems that you believe that GH was completly honest and upfront on the issue. My scenario 2 is just finishing that line of thought.
Scenario 1 is just an alternative that does with fit with all "hard facts" we know about AND makes much more sense than No. 2.

Bout the address:
AInc did put up a address and now they can't be reached by it, even worse the company actually at that address claims to to have never heard of them and that they have allready received several letters this way.

Now that is what I call obvious, and any other explanation would be no less than bizzare. But I must admit that "bizzare" is just righ on spot far to often in anything Amiga.