You're being very selective with your truth, aren't you? Why do you not also mention that the "missing" pages were not included in the deposition to the courts and that even Amiga Inc's counsel obviously didn't think the information contain therein was relevant to their case?
Simply because the website did not make a note of this.The only thing they said was "here is the deposition"
It really does not matter to me, the deposition was incomplete, pages missing many pages unsigned and finally any and/or all of those posted pages could have been altered in any way and we would be none the wiser.
Furthermore, I would find it very odd if Amiga Inc had decided not to include those pages they would have numbered the deposition like they did.
It seems to me when you present something, you only number the presentation in sequence.
It did state in that deposition that they refused to answer some things as it was sensitive information in some way, and that by allowing that information to go public would unduly harm Amiga Inc.
If this is even slightly true, it goes directly back to the vedetta I talked about.
In any case, none of us have the facts of the matter, the article writer does not have all the facts, and hence the article should have reflected this clearly.
For example, the word "may" should have been used, and used often.
on another posting, AMiga Inc may be crooks, they may have scammed everyone with thier coupon scheme, however there are two sides to every story, the court cases are not finalized, and OS4 is not yet released for them to make good on thier promises.
Until these things happen I believe judgement should be reserved ( I believe the catchcry is innocent until proven guilty). Should we trust them? Definately not!
BTW BBRV has admited they are running at a loss in the appeal for support of some weeks ago, and likely will be for some time.They also offered many things except hard currency for this support.
It is my view that Genesi is not in such a strong position as some would make it out to be.
