Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: CyberGraphX 4.0 or Picasso96?  (Read 4119 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline patrikTopic starter

CyberGraphX 4.0 or Picasso96?
« on: November 26, 2003, 10:45:55 AM »
Hi everyone!

I have bought myself an A4000/030 and as it looks I will soon have a CyberVision64 for it :). I wouldnt be surprised if this has been discussed before, but as I couldnt find a thread I have to ask (just point me to the thread if it already exists :)):

For this configuration (030@25MHz, 16MB FAST maximum and CyberVision64-4MB), what would be the best RTG-software - CyberGraphX 4.0 or Picasso96?


/Patrik
 

Offline patrikTopic starter

Re: CyberGraphX 4.0 or Picasso96?
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2003, 08:48:14 PM »
Are there any differences speedwise?


/Patrik
 

Offline patrikTopic starter

Re: CyberGraphX 4.0 or Picasso96?
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2003, 07:36:45 AM »
@Karlos:

Its a shame so little acceleration is implemented. It shouldnt have been a big deal for the people who wrote the drivers to implement the usage of those hardware accelerated operations. Must just say this: grrrarg! ;)

Btw, does P96 support the planar-to-chunky chip roxxler of the CV64?


/Patrik