Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: A2000 which is better  (Read 3550 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
A2000 which is better
« on: May 29, 2012, 03:03:47 PM »
Hello guys,
 
I would like to buy an A2000.
I found two :1) Rev 4 1987, kickstart 1.3
                  2) Rev 6.2 wk06/1990, kickstart 2.04
Otherwise exact configuration on both
 
The second is 10eur cheaper but sound is a bit low ?
 
Which one do you prefer?
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2012, 09:57:02 PM »
6.2 has the battery removed and the area cleaned as I can see.
4.0 has the battery removed, checked and reinstalled w/o any leak...
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 02:56:00 PM »
Thank you all guys for you help.
I will take the 4.0 as I also like it a lot as is super clean inside...
 
D.
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 08:15:12 PM »
:( I already have an A200 with quatum HD and late kickstart but my knowledge about what specs have ends here :D
I need a disc drive as my old one does not work properly, I change it for another from one external drive that also does not work : if you insert a disc it does not found it...Also my cover has one or two scratches and I like to change that too...I will ask seller if the clock works in the 6.2
But I also think that should be avoided due to battery leak damage..
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 08:42:30 PM »
Thanks guys...I ask the seller if the RTC still works in the 6.2...
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2012, 05:37:35 PM »
Here is the answer from the seller :
 
>The board had some slight damage I fixed it and sprayed 'plastic'on it. looks dark. the connector was
> cleaned and functions are ok.
 
So should I get the 6.2 ?
Also what is a fair price for it guys ? (1MB & 1FDD)
 
Thank you
« Last Edit: May 31, 2012, 05:52:21 PM by Dimitrios »
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2012, 05:56:36 PM »
Here is the answer from the seller :

 
>The board had some slight damage I fixed it and sprayed 'plastic'on it. >looks dark. the connector was cleaned and functions are ok.

 
So should I get the 6.2 ?
 
Also what is a fair price for it guys ? (1MB & 1FDD)

 
Thank you :D
Logged
 

Offline DimitriosTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 8
    • Show all replies
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2012, 07:26:18 AM »
I also found this oen guys : What do you think ?
I post ad description

Amiga 2000 Rev 6 1988. Power supply not working and with PC ATX power supply there is no boot floppy disk screen.
Included is PC Pentium 3, 1.4Ghz quasi board (not bridgeboard) which can plug into ISA card slot of Amiga 2000 as an expansion.
PC Floppy and DVD Rom, Memory, Soundcard, USB ports with backplane, and  Pc ATX Power supply with AT Converter to plug onto Amiga 2000  motherboard to power PC Card.
 
Amiga Floppy Drive and broken Amiga 2000 PSU.
Logged
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »