Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors  (Read 42823 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline leirbag28



Ahhhhh!   what a great thread!   but lets keep it positive and encouraging.  Lets send this to Amiga Inc.


I agree with Dave Haynie.....also with Lempkee and Motorollin.


Here is the Deal the way I see it.

The only hope right at this Moment for Amiga Inc (If it were somehow possible that is)  is to recreate the Amiga and release it exactly in the same way as before. Just 10 times more modern, but same principles.

What that is is this:

A Real Amiga...............by Amiga Inc that wns their own Chip plant and owns their own OS.   This AMiga has to absolutely be a Hyrbid between a Game console and Computer just as the A1000..but of course 10 times more powerful than the X-Box 360 at the very least.  A nice business plan for hardware upgrades in advance. but that still allow it to be a custom machine thats not a Mac or PC..........but atthe same time contain Chip slots for a x86 CPU for 100% emulation (or actually becoming a real PC)   witht he capability of running OS X at full speed and Windows Vista at full blown x86 Intel speeds....simply because this Amiga would also be a real PC) But yet is really a Custom Chipset Amiga. Removable gfx chip on the board with a very expandable CPU slot of the same CPU type so that old software continues to work for the next 15 years.

THis is what an Amiga was and what made it succesful................also we need to take back the TV Overscan correct resolution.and not conform to Microsoft STUPID  "640 x 480 is video standard now but stretched reolution" crap.

Notice how now 320 x 240 and 640 x 480 is now video?  its so wacko....Microsoft and PC incapabilities forced everyone to use this substandard format.

We need an Amiga with HDTV output as its main Native video..but in Double or triple that resolution, being able to be displayed on an HDTV in the same way SuperHiRes in Overscan can be seen on a TV thats normally for 720 x 480 output.

Amigas were always True convergence.  Man I despise PC's! and all the greed for money it entails.   Thats what all these Unecessary new formats are for.....to keep the customer spending unecessarily....there are otherways to do this legitimately with Creative new ideas that people will genuinly would want.

a good example is USB and USB 2.0..same connector...just upgraded.............this is good..............unlike for instance Memory Stick........and Memory stick Pro DUO wich one has to buy a new slot to get to work.....Sny could have made it possible to make it work by keeping the shape the same.
I may be wrong with the memory stick thing here but you get the idea.

AMiga might believe they are going somewhere with the Phone content thing....and they indeed might.........but thats the wrong direction for the name "Amiga"   go ahead and continue that..........but change the name for that deprtment to Commodore.........or Agnus Content or something. Leave Amiga for the good stuff and for its possible coming Glory.

Commodore is being prostituded right now.........Amiga is doing similar.  Lets not do this. its making Amiga fake and commodore fake...........people pick up on this.

Fake fake fake.  this is a formula to shoot oneself in the foot.

Solution is as all I have said.....plus merge Amiga back into one company....owning its OS and a Hardware plant.

At the very least focus on one thing!   even just a plain old Killer Console....then take the moeny and run..and rebuild Amiga as a Computer.

Never ever tell me it cant be done............it can! it always can! If we think out of the box.....never conform to human thought..which always limits people.


I perform at a Club on Saturdays using my CD32 for Visuals.  last week they hired to VJ's using High powered Mac Laptops for Visuals using MotionDive Tokyo and Archaos.

The Club workers were so dissapointed with their crappy visuals, compared to my CD32!!!!   And I suck at animating!

what they liked was the resolution my CD32/SX32 pro outputs and how good and clear it looks!  they were only able to output 320 x 240 to be able to run visuals smoothly and mix them..............I run my Visuals at 752 x 480 where ever I can and still run it smooth.

man it was kind satifsying to hear that. :-)


Amiga makes it Posible.   I can run Flash quality animations on an Amiga and so can you..if you "THINK" out of the box.   How you say? FLASH is just a fancy word that makes people think their computers are up to date.  But take a FLASH anim and convert it to Anim5 or ANIM8_32..........and its still Flash.......it still looks good...........and still high quality..........tell people its FLASH and they willbelieve it..........and it really is............just running on a different Harddrive..thats all!

Iff someone asks me if I can run a Flash presentation for them that they created.......I say sure thing..............I go do it and display it on the projector..........they say "Thanks!"   and never know I ran it in Anim8 format on a different computer..........all they know is their animation looked exactly the same.............I equate it to it bieng made on a DVD.....and just simply transfered to DV tape.........nothing loss really...just its not a DVD anyore...but it is still 720 x 480.

lets not conform!  lets Transform!
transform the way poeple think that is!






CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...
 

Offline leirbag28

Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2006, 12:52:28 AM »
@cv643D

 (ie a 486 is about the same speed as a 040).

-------------------------------------------------------

I know what you are trying to say.....but just a sidenote.

a 486 is NOT the same speed as an 040...........though they were in competition with each other at the time and existed around the same time............an 040 will destroy a 486...........an 040 plugged into an Amiga is more like a Pentium II in my experience.

Mathematically calculating...........Yes a 486 will render about the same or faster.  But in actual use..a 486 is super unusable...........heck........my CD32/SX32 pro is 030 50 Mhz and its faster and smoother than any Pentium II.

Just amore satisfying experience is what I really mean.

an 030 cant play Quicktme or edit Video like a Pentium II, but when it comes to responsiveness..........Ah man! Amiga kills in this area.

I cant use a Pentium II today....too slow!.......  but my CD32  however, is my main machine and even use it over my Pentium 4!

CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...
 

Offline leirbag28

Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2006, 03:09:20 AM »
@Sparky


Hiya Sparky! :-D

Don't worry......I am not crazy........I know for sure that a Pentium 2 can process 30 jpg images and convert them to 256 colored Floyed Steinberg dithered images in the same time it takes my CD32 to just do one.

I know that............I mentioned that in my post when I said mathematically.  But performancewise....my Amiga always looks slicker............read higher above in my Original post how what I displayed put Two laptops users to shame. One was probably a Mac. Never even met them.

This was in a real enviromnet popping up images an animations real fast on the screen and intime with the music........I didnt say a word.........this was just what one of the Lighting personell there had to say.....plus they hired me and my Amiga.....and not those guys.

I know he was partially right......as I have seen how these apps look crappy and play crappy.......so far I have not seen much that my Amiga cannot do!   especially if I had a DCTV connected.
Even if it wasnt for the Amiga.......I have seen that the Amiga can stand up in these matters....especially with a Toaster4000.

 I dont think I'm cool or anything.......I rather think I kinda suck and am not good enough.   But PC's just simply.....are much suckier. Probably more correctly said if I blamed it on WIndows.  As I always say:

"It's NOT that Amigas are really GOOD, it's that PC's really suck!"

Im using Elan Performer and Scala MM300 on my CD32/SX32 pro 50mhz 128mb RAM 40 gig HD with MASPlaer MP3 hardware. and DSS8 plus. also the MindEYE hardware with software.

Honestly dude.....my Amiga rocks hardcore.  Imagine if I knew how to animate Visuals like Demo coders......

An Amiga is never obsolete.....just like a Piano isnt obsolete......it still does its job..and does it well.




CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...
 

Offline leirbag28

Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2006, 05:48:56 AM »
@A3KOne

 I think you respond unecessarily......as I already explained that....if you read more closely, I think you will get what I am saying. Already said that the Pentium II will win in Mathematical area.

but I think this part of my comment sums it up:

"Just a more satisfying experience is what I really mean.

an 030 cant play Quicktme or edit Video like a Pentium II, but when it comes to responsiveness..........Ah man! Amiga kills in this area."


 Plus you compare unfairly.........add a Picasso IV and a VLAB motion to an 040..and it can do quite amazingly.............no it wont play "DIVX"  but will play Divx quality movies.........one just has to know what they are doing......or if someone took the time to convert it to an Amiga format......you will be amazed.

its all about the Closeness of everything in the Amiga working together and AmigaOS

Windows is a horrible OS, horribly organized.

Amiga wins in Responsiveness and better overall system.

Keep in mind, one can easily say a Pentium II is even comparable to an AmigaONE...in some ways one can see that.......but in reality they would be wrong........as they are judging it based on lack of Apps, including DIVX playback, or FLASH or Quicktime.............these things just need to be written.


I think most would choose an Amiga with 040 VLAB and picasso set up correctly over a Pentium II any day.

Heck.....I personally would choose an AGA 030 Amiga over the fastest Pentium III
 
CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...
 

Offline leirbag28

Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2006, 11:01:04 PM »
@Sparky

 Sorry.........hehe.....I need that"." key to help me convey my thoughts :-D




@Cymric

Quote:

    leirbag28 wrote:
    Amiga wins in Responsiveness and better overall system.


Absolutely not. Any system where one app behaving badly through unintentional error causes the entire machine to freeze is BAD. Any system which doesn't offer built-in security to prevent unauthorised access to crucial system components is BAD.

----------------------------------------------------------------


Ok then..........why do you suppose many of us Amigans still use our Amigas as Main machines???

Partly its because of its responsiveness............When I am Doing Visuals I use:

Scala MM300
Elan Performer
DSS8
MindEYE
Trip A Tron
Brilliance
AMPlifier

all at the same Time! on a 68030 CD32/SX32  and I swap between them with the LEFT  AMIGA + M key!   Never seen a PC swap that fast!  and still no slowdown.
Everyone knows PC's are massive headaches...I have never ever in my entire life had a pleasurable PC experience. not even with my Pentium 4.......thats why we and all Mac users consistently complain....The Proof is in the Pudding.  PC's just suck and so does Windows. Something is just not right.


Amigas are very productive......imagine if updated properly..........WooHoo!

Im not excited because I am a fanatic......I am excited because I know what this machine can do at such low specs.....and only imagine if there was the AAA Chipset and a 400Mhz 68090 with Workbench 3.6 Nuclear Edition with a free bottle of Plutonium for powering your CPU. hehe!


@Nitro

"Welcome to the new Microsoft.org, never noticed so many Windows fans before."

Hahahahahah!  :-D thats darn funny!  Microsoft.Org hehehe

CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...
 

Offline leirbag28

Re: Dave Haynie (lead engineer of C= Amiga) opinion on Amiga Successors
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2006, 05:07:57 PM »
@Cymric

Quote:

    leirbag28 wrote:
    Ok then..........why do you suppose many of us Amigans still use our Amigas as Main machines???
------------------------------------------------------------------

Because you know every nook and cranny of the machine. You know its idiosyncracies. You know at what phase of the Moon you should ritually slaughter a chicken and perform dark magic rites to exorcise the pent-up bad juju.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes Cymric......this is partially part of the reason.......but with Good Reason!  The Amiga is excellent!




-------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:

    Partly its because of its responsiveness............When I am Doing Visuals I use:
    Scala MM300
    Elan Performer
    DSS8
    MindEYE
    Trip A Tron
    Brilliance
    AMPlifier

    all at the same Time! on a 68030 CD32/SX32 and I swap between them with the LEFT AMIGA + M key! Never seen a PC swap that fast! and still no slowdown.
------------------------------------------------------------


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are a sick masochist to use all that on a 68030 simultaneously. You know what I think? I think that you are grossly overestimating the response time of your tiny setup, and grossly underestimating that of a PC. You are also comparing task switching times when none of these programs are busy doing calculations and are in fact just waiting for user input. (The reason why I joined this forum was a discussion on task switching times. Someone wrote a program to demonstrate that Windows Sucked Badly. Unfortunately, he silently ignored setup delays, memory paging, and what not. And I am very certain you are ignoring that, too.)

I also think that you never gave the PC equivalent a sporting chance because, as I said earlier, you know your way around this setup, and actively dislike learning something new. You have developed a certain way of doing things, you feel comfortable with it, and damn the rest even if it would boost your productiveness. That's fine with me: if you are happy playing with techniques developed in the Stone---okay, Bronze---Age, who am I to argue. But that doesn't mean that PC's automatically suck.
-----------------------------------------------------------------



 This is also True (some of it)   SO I say ok then..... Task Switching on PC's Suck! :-D
By the way Try my setup.......68030 50mhz 128mb 40 gighd MASPlayer  and see for yourself..........SCALA can run scripts and you can press LEFT AMIGA M   and switch to workbench and run an MP3 from AMPlifier with not much difference..........and SCALA is still running it presentation. My Amiga needs to be capable of this.........the Club has no time to wait for me to Load software.   This is activiely happening for 4 to 5 hours straight.

I will again say...Task switching on PC's definitely suck..................Due in part to the way VGA monitors wait to change sync......and also due to the Stupid start menu..........even key combination switching is just not the same............Draggable Amiga screens and clicking the top right corner icon on Amiga is simply unmatched.......Sorry, this is one of my favorite Amiga features........its just done right.......

........and....I'm not a masochist.......you only think that because you think my Amiga is slowing down.   Its Not! I do however only probably use only  2 apps at a time (and yes you are right that they are just waiting user input) although all of them are open even though I only have 2mb Chip RAM  :-D  again....amazing considering how my P4 slows down if I have 4 apps open.
Ohhhh boy!  And I am definitely not overestimating response Times.   Do me a favor......Get Elan Performer  load animations on to every single key.......preload them into RAM (the reason I need 128mb of RAM) or get a SCSI HD.......now Perform!     as fast as you can!    See!  Thats why its called "PERFORMER"  the best app of its kind on the Amiga..........theres tons of imitations on the PC (Archoas, Composite Station, GRID 2, Resolume,)  and I find mine to be the slickest, even on my teeny weeny 030.
This speed may not impress you if your not a VJ.but think in terms of Fast Techno Music...and every image or animation on that key popping up at will intime with the music.



Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I also think that you never gave the PC equivalent a sporting chance because, as I said earlier, you know your way around this setup, and actively dislike learning something new. You have developed a certain way of doing things, you feel comfortable with it, and damn the rest even if it would boost your productiveness. That's fine with me: if you are happy playing with techniques developed in the Stone---okay, Bronze---Age, who am I to argue. But that doesn't mean that PC's automatically suck.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Your right on this passage in almost all acounts.............But I use my PC every day..........every morning....every night..............to search for solutions to replace tasks on my Amiga................namely FIle conversion and Video Playback.

My conclusion..............a PC can never be used professionally for what I use it for reliably.............unless you never connect that PC to the internet and keep it clean and uncluttered. and use another PC for downloading.email etc.....just burn what you need to CD to put it on that PC.....................even wth all this......it still doesnt feel right.......Windows' directory file structure makes no sence.......its the most WACKO of its kind..............PC users are blind to this cuz they never knew anything better.  So they dont get it when I say something like this.

I dont think PC's automatically suck........ one of my quotes is "Its not that Amigas are really good......it's that PC's really suck"

I dont think Amigas are all that great........I just think they are done Properly..and PC are not............Amiga has a good foundation OS, the PC does not..they just add Rockets and Turo Boost to a horrible OS to hide its crappiness By painting over it with More RAM more Mhz, More HD space...........Ridiculous! considering what the Amiga can do with such low specs............I will even completely cast out OS3.9 and below and just compare OS4 to Windows and Macs..........its still wayyyyyyy more efficient.

And by the way.......I never Said "I was NOT a Fanatic"  I definitely am............I was just saying thats NOT the reason why I was saying what I was saying.


And some people might not get it......but I am one of those people who believes he can take on Microsoft with Amiga OS and win!  YES! in this Day and age right now.

For some reason people always misunderstand a statement like that and think:
 "You think you can take on WindowsXP with AmigaOS 3.1?  Hardee Har har....your insane!.....and you think You can take on a Pentium 4 with an OLD custom chipset?  HArdee Har har!  Your insane"


and the answer is NO........Im speaking of a Modern day Equivalent Amiga with OS 3.6 (or OS 5.2)  and a Modern XBOX beating custom Chipset..that can emulate 4 XBOX at once.....but wont come with that capability out of the Box......only with the capability of emulating 2.

Completely fascinate people in the way it looks and works.
All for the Price of $600....being a Full blown computer and Game machine HDTV Component and S-Video out a Native, DVD,VCD,CD+G,PhotoCD, QuickTime DIVX, PhotoJPG and more....able to boot from these kinds of discs, to be viewed immediately, just like a CD32' VCD, AudioCD, CD+G capability and VLM (Jeff Minters Virtual Light Machine type Visuals).....4 joypad ports as standard (Non USB).....and more which I wont mention)

To me Any machine that has anything less of what I mentioned and is released as an "Amiga" today.......is NO Amiga.....its just a Computer with the name slapped on. A nice comparable machine to PC's and Macs it may be........but for that...I would rather get a Mac..which is safer buy and is more established.  Simply becaue that kind of "Amiga"   will not succeed or make a dent in this day and age.


CD32 is actually the best Amiga ever made by Commodore!...