Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: BIGram vs ZorRam...  (Read 9254 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline danbeaver

Re: BIGram vs ZorRam...
« on: May 09, 2013, 09:37:06 PM »
Folks the comparison is on both the Hyperion Classic Amiga Forum and in an Amibay discussion. The BigRam+ has its ram on one side rather than both sides making it longer, otherwise they are identical down to the design and chips used. I put up side-by-side pictures somewhere like Abay.
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: BIGram vs ZorRam...
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2013, 10:36:21 PM »
I have 4 BigRam+ and 2 ZorRam cards spread over my A3/4000's and no problems except in the A4000Ts with Mediators power supply plug in the way of one of my Z3 slots. Just saved some monies.
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: BIGram vs ZorRam...
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2014, 05:23:39 AM »
In other words, both are Zorro 3 only and a side by side comparison show virtually identical chips and electronic IDs with the BigRam+ being single sided and I assume less expensive to build.
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: BIGram vs ZorRam...
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2014, 09:49:59 PM »
Off topic
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: BIGram vs ZorRam...
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2015, 04:13:04 AM »
Quote from: Striker01;783585
Thank you! :)
Of course I have tried the BigRam+ with all other cards removed.
The BigRam+ is not compatible with the Cyberstorm MK1.
Maybe a timing problem.
I just got the confirmation from 505dieter who has exactly the same problem.

Here but all in german language:
http://www.a1k.org/forum/showthread.php?t=41499&page=47

By the way... the RapidRoad USB Module for the X-Surf 100 isn't compatible with the Cyberstorm MK1 aswell. :(

Well is it compatible with the ZorRam? Is that what, "The ZorRAM 256MB card works the way with the MK1" means?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2015, 06:14:55 AM by danbeaver »