Amiga.org

Amiga computer related discussion => Amiga Software Issues and Discussion => Topic started by: CRL on February 24, 2004, 12:12:58 AM

Title: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: CRL on February 24, 2004, 12:12:58 AM
Hi All-
I got my nearly stock ('040/50mhz,CDROM) A4000 running OK and added Fblit and oxyport patches to speed thing up.  Then I got to looking around in aminet and found many other speed patches (memory speedups, cpublit thingies, P2Cgraphic whizbangs, boot-fasters, etc.).  Sooo, do any of these work on an AmiDos 3.9 system?  3.9 was described (uncharitably?) as just incorperating patches that were out there, but I'm not sure which ones.  Or which ones fight eachother and end up slowing things down.  I'm guessing you-all have tried all possible combinations over the years and can suggest worthwhile improvements.  
Yours-
CRL
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: SilvrDrgn on February 24, 2004, 01:00:08 AM
HSMathLibs made a pretty good improvement to my A4000.  Find them here - http://www.hsmathlibs.de/ (http://www.hsmathlibs.de)
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: odin on February 24, 2004, 01:03:20 AM
A 50Mhz 040?! :-o. Sounds like a pretty good speed patch already ;-).

I guess you have some serious cooling in that A4k.
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: CRL on February 24, 2004, 01:25:04 AM
Hi Odin-
Yes.  I bought a Sonnet "quaddoubler", from a classic Mac supply company.  Comes with a big heatsink and fan.  Plug and play.  There is some discussion of these things in a hardware thread.

slvrdrgn- Thanks for the mathcode tip.  I assumed that amidos 3.9 had included this fix?  I don't recall a claim to that effect, so I must have assumed it.  They did say "many optimizations" or word like that.  I'll try the beta.  Is it reasonably safe?

Yours-
CRL
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: CRL on February 24, 2004, 01:26:32 AM
oops.. hit send twice somehow.
Sorry-
CRL
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: Castellen on February 24, 2004, 05:31:25 AM
Executive is good if you're running lots of different programs at the same time.

It doesn't necessarily make anything run faster, but since it dynamically allocates task priorities either automatically or by your preset instructions, it can make things run a lot smoother.

Works great with AOS3.9 + BB2 and earlier OS versions.
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: MaDDuck on February 24, 2004, 07:15:24 AM
Quote

SilvrDrgn wrote:
HSMathLibs made a pretty good improvement to my A4000.  Find them here - http://www.hsmathlibs.de/ (http://www.hsmathlibs.de)


is that it???
Anybody have anything else?
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: SnowBord on February 24, 2004, 07:21:35 AM
totally rusty, but doesnt new8n1.device help for networking?

i had tons up my sleeve back in the day including the new maths libs...
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: lionstorm on February 24, 2004, 08:17:09 AM
add env-handler to your patch list. It avoids loading all env in ram, thus saving memory and probably boot time.
Blizkick is a must if you fulfill the requirement plus exec44 (you can find them here http://piru.dyndns.org/~p/sw/). Otherwise there is mcp, CMQ and mmulibs.
Lio
Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: Damion on February 24, 2004, 08:45:30 AM
Blizkick and exec44 are required, IMO. :) You may also want to check
out  SystemPatch (http://digilander.libero.it/ziosante/), I used it for quite a while and it works well...
(it also replaces FText and BlazeWCP).

Another tip -- try running "FBlit" in exclude mode...IBrowse f.e. won't
otherwise be promoted, unless you set it manually to your "include"
list.

Title: Re: Best Classic speed patches?
Post by: CRL on February 24, 2004, 05:28:08 PM
Thanks All-
I've downloaded all the suggested patches and will try them.  Question: doesn't 3.9 shift the ROM to RAM in order to patch stuff? And if so isn't it in RAM like blitzkick, providing all the inherent speedup? What am I missing here?

Also- there was a memory speed-up in aminet that made me wonder if it would work on a A4000. (According to ABIB my memory functions are the slowest part of the system.)

Your past advice got me to invest in turboprint, which did improve things nicely.  How much would I notice the difference a video card makes?  Screens pop up real lively as is, but I can't get video clips (the movie trailers on the 3.9 cd)to show smoothly. Is the slow part the decoding (CPU) or the screen painting?  How does one sort that out? some kind of benchmark program?  Just full of ??? today.
Yours-
CRL