Amiga.org
Amiga computer related discussion => Amiga Software Issues and Discussion => Topic started by: Yahoo (bot) on January 06, 2013, 04:50:12 PM
-
I'm sure I've read some 'history' about this, but I can't find the full story again, but why hasn't there been any updates after 1.9, while MorphOS is up to 1.18, Why nothing past 2010?
-
I'm sure I've read some 'history' about this, but I can't find the full story again, but why hasn't there been any updates after 1.9, while MorphOS is up to 1.18, Why nothing past 2010?
dunno. maybe there are some MUI classes that need to be released? kas1e did build a binary of version 1.17 before focusing on DOPUS5, but it won't run on the released versions of AOS4. darn shame because the performance difference between versions 1.9 and 1.17 when running MOS on my peg2 are substantial so i would imagine the same holds for the AOS version. you could try PMing him over on amigans.net (http://www.amigans.net) to see if he's interested in continuing....
-- eliyahu
-
Maybe Fab is just too busy. He is a MorphOS developer after all.
-
MUI & MOS Dev kinda says it all.
-
It's not just OWB. There are a lot of OS4 programs - both backported from MorphOS and ported from other platforms - that had some initial work done but have been stagnant ever since. I wish more OS4 developers understood that maintaining software is just as important as the initial release.
-
MUI & MOS Dev kinda says it all.
The fact that every release has been open-source for a couple of years, and OS4 version is still so far behind, kinda says it all.
-
It's not just OWB. There are a lot of OS4 programs - both backported from MorphOS and ported from other platforms - that had some initial work done but have been stagnant ever since. I wish more OS4 developers understood that maintaining software is just as important as the initial release.
If we're talking MUI-OWB I think kas1e (who did the Os4 port) got pissed off and stopped development on it after the initial release. Something to do with Hyperion iirc, but memory is sketchy, if I can find the thread I'll link to it.
-
I'm sure I've read some 'history' about this, but I can't find the full story again, but why hasn't there been any updates after 1.9, while MorphOS is up to 1.18, Why nothing past 2010?
Just use "Timberwolf", the Firefox/Holy Grail of OS4!
:p
-
If we're talking MUI-OWB
There is no such thing.
:evil:
-
There is no such thing.
:evil:
http://os4depot.net/?function=showfile&file=network/browser/muiowb.lha
There are two versions of OWB for OS4, Reaction based OWB (now discontinued) and the port of Odyssey (just before the rename), which it seems has also stopped development at the moment, if someone picks it up again it could resume, or if kas1e changes his mind.
-
Just use "Timberwolf", the Firefox/Holy Grail of OS4!
:p
Far too slow to be usable in its present state.
-
I believe the biggest issue with the Amiga community today is how few developers there actually are.
The few that we do have, are often stretched very thin, and they can either chose to (a) port/write new software to Amiga or (b) maintain existing software.
Pick one.
I'm in the '(a)' camp, personally, which means I work on a project, get it running, and move on, in the hopes that someone in the '(b)' camp is interested enough in it to maintain it long term. (I do AROS work mostly, so it's all open-source stuff - easy for someone new to pick up and maintain).
-
so far i know odyssey port of aros differs from the one for os4, the mui classes were ported by deadwood independently. actually it might be better to maintain them all together, but well..
unfortunately odyssey uses cmake to build, which makes it alien to aros build system. id prefer to have it in contributions, available for 68k too, which seems impossible atm.
the currently available aros owb by szymczyk ported by jason (ezrec) is quite an achivement already though, its rather dependable under uae, even if it is slow even there. i think odyssey might be really faster as szymczyks was only basic port.
-
@danwood
Since 5 Sep 2011 the browser's name is "Odyssey", before that it simply was "OWB". Never has the official name of the browser been "MUI-OWB" AFAIK, that's just some OS4 community make-up name to separate Fab's browser from completely unrelated ones with similar names, but again - since 5 Sep 2011 there hasn't been any *need* for make-up names, since no web browser for AmigaOS has a similar name as Odyssey, so there is no reason not to use its *proper* name!
;)
-
I'm sure I've read some 'history' about this, but I can't find the full story again, but why hasn't there been any updates after 1.9, while MorphOS is up to 1.18, Why nothing past 2010?
A while ago, kas1e cited (http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum/viewtopic.php?post_id=72697#forumpost72697) lack of time and said that he wanted to open a bounty before he tackles an update.. He's been assigned the VPDF bounty (http://amigabounty.net/?function=viewproject&projectid=101) in July, which should have been finished in December but looks like it was abandoned. kas1e is now waiting for amigabounty.net (http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5703&forum=3&post_id=76351#forumpost76351) to open another MUIOWB bounty for him.
And guys, please don't mention MorphOS in this thread. It might draw tmhgm's attention.
-
And guys, please don't mention MorphOS in this thread. It might draw tmhgm's attention.
That would be bad!
:lol:
-
OWB never ran worth a **** on my OS4 machine, if it ran at all. Sorry.
I'll stick with Timberwolf, it'll actually handle the Google cloud apps just fine where as OWB on OS4 barfed left and right.
-
@danwood
Since 5 Sep 2011 the browser's name is "Odyssey", before that it simply was "OWB". Never has the official name of the browser been "MUI-OWB" AFAIK, that's just some OS4 community make-up name to separate Fab's browser from completely unrelated ones with similar names, but again - since 5 Sep 2011 there hasn't been any *need* for make-up names, since no web browser for AmigaOS has a similar name as Odyssey, so there is no reason not to use its *proper* name!
;)
Come on, there's no need to be pedantic about it. "MUI-OWB" came about to differentiate it from the original OS4 port. Everyone knows what it means and it helps to prevent confusion between the multiple forks.
And yes, even though the official name is now Odyssey, it doesn't seem to have caught on much. I for one still call it OWB on my MorphOS box. It takes a long time to break old naming habits.
-
Come on, there's no need to be pedantic about it. "MUI-OWB" came about to differentiate it from the original OS4 port. Everyone knows what it means and it helps to prevent confusion between the multiple forks.
Well since 5 Sep 2011 the browser is officially named (and known as) Odyssey, and one of the reasons for the new name was to prevent confusions, so why not call it by its real name?
:confused:
It has (according to Fab) practically nothing to do with "Origyn Web Browser" anymore, since quite some time before the name change already (which was one of the reasons to the name change in the first place), and to still call it "MUI-OWB" today is to suggest it would merely be some recompile of "Origyn", only with a different GUI engine (like: "MUI instead of Reaction").
Which of course couldn't be further from the truth! It's not a "fork" at all! :evil:
It was only some month ago I saw some post at AW.net that confused/mixed up Odyssey with some OS4 "Origyn" (OWB) compilation, most certainly because of the poor MUI-OWB "name", which IMHO is to *belittle* Fab's effort quite gravely, since Odyssey is a uniquely developed (and maintained) browser based on Webkit, with huge amounts of efforts put into it over these years, and nothing like the various ports of "Origyn" at all. And here *you* are, talking about "preventing confusion between different forks"! "Original OS4 port"?! Come on! You are making my case!
There is nothing "pedantic" about this, Odyssey is a unique Amiga development. It's probably the single most important application developed for Amiga in modern times (relatively speaking), a lot of *real* development efforts (as opposed to the "quick porting" efforts we are used to today) was put into it, and it deserves to be called by its *proper* name (a name that has been here for a *very* long time by now), and not to be confused with some cheap "Origyn" port (suggesting it's a "fork" of some kind).
The fact that "Odyssey Web Browser" gets shortened the same way is not the point, that part was probably even a bit of a joke anyway. But to avoid all kinds of confusion, while still paying proper amount of respect to it, just call it Odyssey! It's as simple as that! Not difficult at all!
:)
-
Here we can see some new interesting comments (http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1888) about the situation from kas1e at the Hyperion Entertainment Message Board! It seems some users are now really pissed off. :nervous:
(Content has been cowardly removed by S. Solie.)
-
Here we can see some new interesting comments (http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1888) about the situation from kas1e at the Hyperion Entertainment Message Board! It seems some users are now really pissed off. :nervous:
Besides that the word "pissed" is a little too often for my taste... There are some fundamental questions... who does it? The number of volunteers in the amiga-community (with enough knowledge) is very limited (or better not-existing). The most who have experience already have their projects. So he (the user) does a good job to "piss-off kas1e". Who organizes it then? This user? I would predict that he does not do it (just requesting/expecting). Then there are other related problems. I read a discussion on amigans where kas1e explained some of the problems. OWB is "opensource" but somehow not. The sources are in development in a closed area where noone else can commit. That means that every sourcechange (for AROS/AmigaOS) has to be redone every time a new version is ported. People tend to forget so basically it all has to be redone every time (a lot of wasted time and energy). The second problem is important components like HTML5 player are not part of OWB but closed source components of MorphOS. Of course the GUI is MUI4 and that is closed source too. So every port of OWB is not only older than the actual/newest one, it is also worse. Someone discussed with me that he would prefer a Ambient port to Magellan for AROS. Here would the same happen as now with OWB.
For people interested to read: http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5978&forum=29&post_id=80156#forumpost80156
-
I personally am completely neutral towards things, but these delaying tactics is quite unfair towards all the users without there being the slightest progress. Since it would be better to close a project quite immediately, rather than constantly raise false expectations. And the subsequent censorship by Steven Solie does not change anything!
-
Besides that the word "pissed" is a little too often for my taste... There are some fundamental questions... who does it? The number of volunteers in the amiga-community (with enough knowledge) is very limited (or better not-existing). The most who have experience already have their projects. So he (the user) does a good job to "piss-off kas1e". Who organizes it then? This user? I would predict that he does not do it (just requesting/expecting). Then there are other related problems. I read a discussion on amigans where kas1e explained some of the problems. OWB is "opensource" but somehow not. The sources are in development in a closed area where noone else can commit. That means that every sourcechange (for AROS/AmigaOS) has to be redone every time a new version is ported. People tend to forget so basically it all has to be redone every time (a lot of wasted time and energy). The second problem is important components like HTML5 player are not part of OWB but closed source components of MorphOS. Of course the GUI is MUI4 and that is closed source too. So every port of OWB is not only older than the actual/newest one, it is also worse. Someone discussed with me that he would prefer a Ambient port to Magellan for AROS. Here would the same happen as now with OWB.
For people interested to read: http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5978&forum=29&post_id=80156#forumpost80156
We ll I ve tried to setup Power2People bounty on matter and got a simple answer that current OWB MorphOS is not suitable since its NOT completely open source. Surely, this longer exponations of it being closely tied to MorphOS explain it.
Well, currently one has to admit - MorphOS has better browsing experience. That with hungry and unstable TW make matters for OS4 users worse (not only in comparison to MOS)
Browsers, beside office, being critical points of OS usability and MOS and OS4 developers at some point could even have a need to halt OS development to resolve the matter. Without those, great OS itself is quite unsuitable for anything but fun. :juggler: