Amiga.org

Amiga computer related discussion => General chat about Amiga topics => Topic started by: Marky_D_Sahd on December 28, 2003, 07:29:34 AM

Title: Magazine update??
Post by: Marky_D_Sahd on December 28, 2003, 07:29:34 AM

Now that AOS 4 has been announced as arriving sometime in January, what about the Amiga.Org magazine??????

Title: Re: Magazine update??
Post by: Marky_D_Sahd on December 30, 2003, 05:06:42 AM

Nobody knows anything?

Title: Re: Magazine update??
Post by: odin on December 30, 2003, 05:18:57 AM

The mailing list is pretty much dead too.....no activity for the last 20 days

Title: Re: Magazine update??
Post by: on December 30, 2003, 05:30:17 AM

Ask Kees, if you can find him.   Last I heard, he was experiencing a computer meltdown.

Wayne

Title: Re: Magazine update??
Post by: bhoggett on December 30, 2003, 07:57:51 AM

AFAIK, most of the material for issue 1 was in the bag according to schedule, but something happened that seems to have put a stopper on things for now. We did have confirmaton that there was a delay a few weeks ago, but so far there's no explanation or any news of what is to happen next.

If Kees has had a computer meltdown it would partially explain the problems, but not entirely. I guess we'll just have to wait and see...

Title: Re: Magazine update??
Post by: sir_inferno on December 30, 2003, 01:45:44 PM

Quote

bhoggett wrote:

but something happened that seems to have put a stopper on things for now.

If Kees has had a computer meltdown it would partially explain the problems, but not entirely.

it would if he lost all the data and was secretly rewriting it now  :-(   :-)

Title: Re: Magazine update??
Post by: bhoggett on December 30, 2003, 08:22:57 PM

Quote

sir_inferno wrote:

Quote

bhoggett wrote:

but something happened that seems to have put a stopper on things for now.

If Kees has had a computer meltdown it would partially explain the problems, but not entirely.

it would if he lost all the data and was secretly rewriting it now  :-(   :-)

:-D

Well, Kees isn't the receiving point for submissions so it's logical to think there is a backup of them somewhere else at least. Even if the material was lost, it would be quicker (not to mention more effective) to contact the authors and get them to re-submit. I think the evidence points to the problem being something else.