Amiga.org

Amiga computer related discussion => Amiga Software Issues and Discussion => Topic started by: Selles on December 21, 2010, 11:07:35 PM

Title: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: Selles on December 21, 2010, 11:07:35 PM

I have always admired Sound, Noise, and Pro Tracker.  I do not like Octa-Med.  Is there a classic looking tracker that runs from the hard drive and works with WB 3.1?  Early trackers, like Sound Tracker, would only load from disk.

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: pan1k on December 22, 2010, 03:03:03 AM

I have a bunch of trackers, and they all run from the Harddrive. I got them off Aminet.

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: whabang on December 22, 2010, 08:29:38 AM

Try Digibooster. Should be on Aminet.

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: MaximvsPayne on December 22, 2010, 10:24:18 AM

digibooster rocks, ahx is also great (for chiptunes). but there are tons of other good trackers on aminet, thats true.

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: hooligan on December 22, 2010, 10:38:51 AM

Quote from: Selles;600598

I have always admired Sound, Noise, and Pro Tracker.  I do not like Octa-Med.  Is there a classic looking tracker that runs from the hard drive and works with WB 3.1?  Early trackers, like Sound Tracker, would only load from disk.

I already left the thread but had to come back just to ask.. what on earth does sound/noise/protracker has superior over octamed? Especially OmedV4 is a gem among old trackers in terms of features and usability.

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: gertsy on December 22, 2010, 11:17:39 AM

For vanilla or MWB 3.1 : "Eagle" rocks.  Pun intended.  lightweight and easy to use.  once you turn off all the crud... er features...

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: MaximvsPayne on December 22, 2010, 12:00:32 PM

artofnoise

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm-dVDczbpE

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: MaximvsPayne on December 22, 2010, 12:02:53 PM

or hivelytracker

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY_Wnf7FthQ&feature=related

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: whabang on December 22, 2010, 12:03:25 PM

Quote from: hooligan;600677

I already left the thread but had to come back just to ask.. what on earth does sound/noise/protracker has superior over octamed? Especially OmedV4 is a gem among old trackers in terms of features and usability.

Interface preferences, no doubt. I always preferred Digibooster, even though Octamed is clearly superior.

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: Linde on December 22, 2010, 12:08:11 PM

Protracker 2.3D runs fine from a hard disk without any particularities... It helps assigning ST-00: to the program folder in s:user-startup, though, as such:

Code: [Select]

Assign ST-00: your:protracker/folder
This way you can save settings for colors/default folders etc.

Here's a link (http://ftp://ftp.untergrund.net/users/hitchhikr/old/tools/Protracker_v2.3d.zip)

Title: Re: Need a tracker for WB 3.1
Post by: MaximvsPayne on December 22, 2010, 12:09:25 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiLrC1o6urA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAItpWxtNNU&feature=related

even more amiga-tracker vids. if you should buy an amigaos4 machine someday just try out milkytracker

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN0oJFIpbys