Amiga.org

Amiga computer related discussion => Amiga Software Issues and Discussion => Topic started by: mingle on November 28, 2008, 04:15:08 AM

Title: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: mingle on November 28, 2008, 04:15:08 AM
Hi,

I'm trying to find a replacement for the (next to useless!) "Ed" command that comes with WB3.1...

I don't want a massive bells-and-whistles editor, just something simple that supports full-screen editing - maybe with find/replace and 'standard' windows-like CTRL-C/X/V

One look at the available files on Aminet and I'm at a loss of which to choose, so any opinions would be welcome!

Cheers,

Mike.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: Tension on November 28, 2008, 04:53:41 AM
GoldED
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: don27dog on November 28, 2008, 05:04:44 AM
CygnusEd
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: stefcep2 on November 28, 2008, 06:21:31 AM
GoldEd and CED are all pretty heavy duty text editors.  I use Jano Editor from aminet.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: McVenco on November 28, 2008, 07:38:33 AM
AmisED (http://aminet.net/package/text/edit/AmisED)
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: djbase on November 28, 2008, 08:20:20 AM
microGoldED  :-D
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: Varthall on November 28, 2008, 09:09:20 AM
Nowadays I use OS4's own NotePad as my texteditor, on my A1200 with OS 3.0 I used (and liked) BlacksEditor, it was shareware at the time but it's now freeware:

http://aminet.net/search?query=blackseditor

Varthall
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: itix on November 28, 2008, 09:30:23 AM
BlacksEditor is the best.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: Dwyloc on November 28, 2008, 04:34:52 PM
I second CygnusEd as probably the best Amiga text editor of all time :-D
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: jj on November 28, 2008, 04:41:07 PM
use edit instead of ed  :-D
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: meega on November 28, 2008, 04:47:57 PM
@JJ, LOL.

@mingle, Ed is actually a very capable editor, but I also find it a bit clunky for regular use. However, have you tried renaming S:Ed-startup to something else, say Ed-startup.orig, and running Ed again to see the menus? It's a lot more usable that way.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: blanning on November 28, 2008, 07:12:22 PM
I noticed that emacs was available on one of the disks that comes wit the OS.  I know almost nothing about emacs.  But the menus made it a very serviceable editor to use in a pinch.

I was delighted to see that vim had been ported to the amiga.  Although I haven't tried it yet.

VI: Simultaneously the best and worst editor ever invented.

brian
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: redfox on November 28, 2008, 07:49:48 PM
@mingle

When I was still using my A2000HD, I used a nice little program called Write from the Amiga Appetizer package by Gold Disk. It was a fast and easy to use word processor program.

I used Ed for writing scripts and ARexx programs and Final Writer for heavy duty word processing.

---
redfox
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: the_leander on November 28, 2008, 08:24:14 PM
Quote

Tension wrote:
GoldED


The original and best, accept no substitute.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: mingle on November 28, 2008, 09:32:35 PM
Well guys, many thanks for the suggestions...

I've tried out most of the ones you listed.

And the winner is......

JanoEditor!!!

@stefcp2, I owe you a beer! :-)

It seems to be the quickest to load, uses minimal RAM and has a great set of features, without being too overblown...

Highly recommended!

... now I can finally get down to giving my User-startup a good thrashing! :-)

Cheers,

Mike.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 "Ed" text editor?
Post by: rare_j on November 28, 2008, 11:23:07 PM
Janoeditor is nice but I get a lot of enforcer hits from it which gives me the willies and I don't like to use it anymore.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 \
Post by: spudmiga on November 19, 2019, 11:59:48 PM
Just downloaded JanoEditor and have to say I am very impressed, nice and lightweight with the main features that you need, notably cut copy and paste.
Job done!

Spud  8)
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 \
Post by: NinjaCyborg on December 31, 2019, 07:45:48 PM
By far the best editor is TurboText 2 which you can download for free.
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 \
Post by: TribbleSmasher on December 31, 2019, 07:53:19 PM
A really lightweight one is Redit.
Version has even more features but still runs on WB1.2, if needed.
http://aminet.net/package/text/edit/Redit
Title: Re: Best alternative to WB3.1 \
Post by: kolla on January 01, 2020, 02:26:31 PM
I'm trying to find a replacement for the (next to useless!) "Ed" command that comes with WB3.1...

The best replacement for that would be the WB 3.1.4 C:Ed :)

As for useless... no it is not useless, it is tiny and powerful once you get to know how to use it.