Amiga.org

Operating System Specific Discussions => Amiga OS => Amiga OS -- Development => Topic started by: Jose on April 09, 2008, 09:56:27 PM

Title: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Jose on April 09, 2008, 09:56:27 PM
For the 1st time I've witnessed what seem to be serious bugs on CrossDOS (latest version). Some files are simply not saved, and 2 disks formated at 1.44Mb (the HD floppy on my A4000D ;))  either didn't finish formating or were simply unsable.

Which one of MessyDOS / FAT95 would you guys advice on speed/features/CPU overhead.

BTW, can't seem to be able to find any of them on Aminet ?!
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Jose on April 09, 2008, 10:00:41 PM
Ups, wrong forum, can't some mod move it to software....
Thx
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Heinz on April 09, 2008, 10:18:56 PM
Quote

Jose wrote:
For the 1st time I've witnessed what seem to be serious bugs on CrossDOS (latest version). Some files are simply not saved, and 2 disks formated at 1.44Mb (the HD floppy on my A4000D ;))  either didn't finish formating or were simply unsable.

Which one of MessyDOS / FAT95 would you guys advice on speed/features/CPU overhead.

BTW, can't seem to be able to find any of them on Aminet ?!


I think the Author of MessyDos is active on aros-exec. maybe you ask there ?
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Jose on April 09, 2008, 10:34:06 PM
No prob, I'll wait till Aminet is up and runing well again. I still haven't decided yet on which one to choose, waiting for some advice / comparisons...
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Tenacious on April 10, 2008, 12:19:54 AM
Have you tried MultiDos (on Aminet)?
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Jose on April 10, 2008, 01:05:40 AM
@Tenacious

Nope, didn't knew about that one, is it good ? I've only used CrossDos till now.
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Tenacious on April 10, 2008, 04:34:05 AM
I've used it for years, beginning in my A500 days.  I like how it mounts without an extra icon and the way it can be incorporated into a DirUtil.  It reads dos disks well with no fuss at all.  It's free, small and requires few resources.

It don't know if it includes text translators or supports long file names.  I don't use these features.  CrossDos probably includes a lot more stuff.

Try it out when Aminet comes back online.
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: alexh on April 10, 2008, 09:04:30 AM
@Jose

Yeah? I've used CrossDos Gold v7.04 for years on my A4000/40 with HD disks and never had a problem.

Consultron's CrossDos is one of the only bits of software I actually bought (although thats probably not something to be proud of)

You sure your disks werent just buggered?
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Jose on April 10, 2008, 07:32:01 PM
@tenacious
Aminet is back and 1st thing I noticed is that MultiDos is way older than the others but very small code indeed. I think I'll give it a try with fat95.

@alexh

"Consultron's CrossDos is one of the only bits of software I actually bought (although thats probably not something to be proud of)"

Hell, why not ?:) I almost bought it too at the time. I'm gonna check out the floppies on a PC just to be sure. But they're Imation branded, so should last a bunch of years...
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Tenacious on April 13, 2008, 05:42:07 PM
@ Jose

Let me know how it turns out for you.

Sometimes, the oldest software are the programs with the smallest footprint.  

Over the years, there were a number of excellent programs that went under the "popular" radar screen.  MultiDos was one of those.
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: Jose on April 18, 2008, 07:16:40 PM
Well, turned out the more problematic floppy formated well under Win2K but there was a big delay on some part.. I haven't done extensive tests so don't know anything for sure. Cross should display a message when it can't format a disk completely though, and it didn't, it simple stoped at some point... Plus, when I was backing up some sources some files on that floppy disk just didn't copy over, even though there was absolutely no message saying the copy couldn't be done...
Title: Re: Cross DOS replacement: MessyDOS or FAT95 ?
Post by: CLS2086 on April 19, 2008, 10:19:09 AM
both doesn´t allow you to access partition for CBM bridgeboard