Amiga.org
Amiga computer related discussion => Amiga Hardware Issues and discussion => Topic started by: biggun on April 08, 2008, 01:56:45 PM
-
Many thanks in advance for helping me ...
As you might know I part of the Natami fans (www.natami.net) and I'm right now evaluating the usability of using a Coldfire for a new inexpensive classic AMIGA.
I believe that "whatever CPU" we are going to use, it should provide a minimum performance level for satisfying todays demands.
To be able to better understand where the Coldfire stands compared to classic 68k systems or compared to UAE, OS4,
I've put together a small benchsuit.
You would help me a lot if you could run this below program on your AMIGA and post the results.
Please be prepared that it will run several minutes.
Please be so kind and state your machine details (CPU etc)
AMIGA-OS EXE (50k)
bench68k (http://www.greyhound-data.com/gunnar/bench68k)
For those interested here is the source:
bench68k.c (http://www.greyhound-data.com/gunnar/bench68k.c)
bench68k_test.s (http://www.greyhound-data.com/gunnar/bench68k_test.s)
Many thanks in advance
Gunnar
-
here (http://www.webalice.it/cieffeeditingvideo/a4k/Bench_OS3.9) under AmigaOS3.9-68060 @ 60 Mhz (CSPPC)
and here (http://www.webalice.it/cieffeeditingvideo/a4k/Bench_OS4) under AmigaOS4 on the same machine - 604e @ 200 Mhz (just for the sake of)
-
Damn it, I wanted to test it on my A1200 with B1220/4 but I am out of memory. :boohoo:
-
Hi,
What is your biggest free block? (output of avail)
Cheers
-
biggun wrote:
Hi,
What is your biggest free block? (output of avail)
Cheers
1728216 :-D
-
1728216 :-D
If you have a free block of 2.2 MB it should work.
Maybe you could close some aps?
But be aware that on the 020 it will runs for a while.
The test should give you time for a coffee or two.
-
Framiga wrote:
here (http://www.webalice.it/cieffeeditingvideo/a4k/Bench_OS3.9) under AmigaOS3.9-68060 @ 60 Mhz (CSPPC)
and here (http://www.webalice.it/cieffeeditingvideo/a4k/Bench_OS4) under AmigaOS4 on the same machine - 604e @ 200 Mhz (just for the sake of)
Cool, many Thanks!
-
biggun wrote:
1728216 :-D
If you have a free block of 2.2 MB it should work.
Maybe you could close some aps?
But be aware that on the 020 it will runs for a while.
The test should give you time for a coffee or two.
Will 2530608 be enough? OS3.9 eats all my memory.
-
I did the test on WINUAE:
http://img179.imageshack.us/my.php?image=bench68kjpgcn2.jpg
-
Is this for real Amiga's only or would running it under Winuae help out at all?. I could give you my machine specs.
-
Just wanted to test it but I don't have ixemul.library (or whatever that name was I saw in the requester :-))
I ran it on WB3.1 - does it need OS3.9 by any chance?
-
DJBase wrote:
biggun wrote:
1728216 :-D
If you have a free block of 2.2 MB it should work.
Maybe you could close some aps?
But be aware that on the 020 it will runs for a while.
The test should give you time for a coffee or two.
Will 2530608 be enough? OS3.9 eats all my memory.
I've just uploaded a new version for you.
The new version will go down to lower memory requirements if it can't get the big buffers.
It should work on your 020 system with 2MB free.
Can you please redownload the test and try again?
many thanks
-
biggun wrote:
I've just uploaded a new version for you.
The new version will go down to lower memory requirements if it can't get the big buffers.
It should work on your 020 system with 2MB free.
Can you please redownload the test and try again?
many thanks
I did but all I get is:
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v3.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
EMT trap
and then it quits. :-?
-
DJBase wrote:
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
EMT trap
and then it quits. :-?
Do you have a FPU?
-
biggun wrote:
Do you have a FPU?
Yes, there is a 68882 installed on the board.
-
So does this require 3.9? If not, I can run it on my 68030 when I get home tonite.
-
hallo. well i made both tests now to be sure.
the system:
PROCESSOR: CPU 68060/68060fpu/68060mmu
CUSTOM CHIPS: AA PAL Alice (id=$0023), AA Lisa (id=$00F8)
VERS: Kickstart version 40.68, Exec version 40.10, Disk version 45.3
RAM: Node type $A, Attributes $505 (FAST), at $8000000-$BFFFFFF (64.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $505 (FAST), at $7000000-$7FFFFFF (16.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $703 (CHIP), at $1000-$1FFFFF (~2.0 meg)
BOARDS:
Board (Index Information Ltd): Prod=2206/33($89E/$21)
(@$40000000, size 16meg, subsize same)
Board (Index Information Ltd): Prod=2206/161($89E/$A1)
(@$50000000, size 256meg, subsize same)
Board + ROM (HD?) (Index Information Ltd): Prod=2206/45($89E/$2D)
(@$60000000, size 16meg, subsize 4meg)
Board + ROM (HD?) (Index Information Ltd): Prod=2206/29($89E/$1D)
(@$61000000, size 16meg, subsize same)
Board + ROM (HD?) (phase 5): Prod=8512/12($2140/$C) (@$E90000 64K)
(it is an a4k with mediator4000di)
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v3.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 3
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 183.1 183.5 182.3 177.2
shift 184.1 183.7 182.4 176.2
mul 50.2 50.1 50.0 49.5
bra-un 17.3 17.2 17.0 17.0
bra-pre 63.6 63.6 63.5 62.8
bsr 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 5.6
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.5 33.3 33.0 31.6
read 8 20.4 20.3 20.3 20.2
read 16 33.8 33.7 33.6 33.2
read 32 40.5 40.4 40.3 39.7
read 32x4 37.2 37.1 36.9 36.5
read 32x4B 40.5 40.4 40.3 39.6
write 8 25.3 25.2 25.2 24.9
write 16 26.9 26.9 26.8 26.6
write 32 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.6
write 32x4 27.0 26.9 26.8 26.7
write 32x4B 26.9 26.9 26.8 26.7
copy 8 23.3 23.2 23.1 22.5
copy 32 33.6 33.4 33.2 32.2
copy 32x4 32.4 32.3 32.1 30.9
copy 32x4B 31.2 31.1 30.9 29.8
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.6 32.4 173.3 187.0
read 8 20.3 20.9 25.5 25.7
read 16 33.8 37.2 97.4 100.9
read 32 40.5 45.7 188.2 196.7
read 32x4 37.2 41.2 127.0 132.7
read 32x4B 40.5 45.3 183.9 195.8
write 8 25.3 27.2 49.7 50.9
write 16 26.9 28.8 50.5 51.0
write 32 27.0 30.0 99.0 101.2
write 32x4 26.9 30.5 185.3 196.9
write 32x4B 26.9 30.4 149.7 159.9
copy 8 23.4 23.8 44.0 45.2
copy 32 33.6 35.9 176.5 191.5
copy 32x4 32.3 33.0 176.0 191.1
copy 32x4B 31.2 31.7 145.6 154.3
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.00
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 3
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 91.7 91.2 89.8 85.0
shift 91.7 91.9 90.6 85.4
mul 25.1 25.0 24.9 24.6
bra-un 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.5
bra-pre 31.8 31.8 31.6 31.0
bsr 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.8
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.6 33.2 32.3 32.5
read 8 20.4 20.3 20.2 20.0
read 16 33.8 33.7 33.5 32.9
read 32 40.5 40.3 40.1 39.1
read 32x4 37.2 37.0 36.7 35.8
read 32x4B 40.4 40.3 40.0 39.0
write 8 25.3 25.2 25.1 24.7
write 16 26.9 26.8 26.7 26.3
write 32 27.0 26.9 26.8 26.4
write 32x4 26.9 26.9 26.8 26.4
write 32x4B 26.9 26.8 26.8 26.3
copy 8 23.3 23.2 22.9 21.1
copy 32 33.6 33.4 33.1 30.5
copy 32x4 32.4 32.3 32.0 30.8
copy 32x4B 31.2 31.1 30.8 29.7
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.6 32.4 173.4 187.5
read 8 20.3 20.9 25.4 25.7
read 16 33.8 37.2 97.0 100.7
read 32 40.5 45.5 186.3 197.8
read 32x4 37.0 41.3 126.7 132.5
read 32x4B 40.5 45.5 182.3 196.4
write 8 25.3 27.1 49.7 50.9
write 16 26.9 28.8 50.2 51.2
write 32 26.9 29.8 98.3 100.5
write 32x4 26.9 30.5 181.3 196.9
write 32x4B 26.9 30.4 146.9 158.2
copy 8 23.4 22.1 43.8 45.2
copy 32 33.6 32.4 174.4 192.1
copy 32x4 32.4 34.3 175.9 191.2
copy 32x4B 31.2 32.4 143.9 155.4
-------------------------------------------
icould perform this test on a variety of systems here. i have 4 a4ks working at the moment with different cpu/ram setups. and also several 1k2 also with different setups
greetz
wawa
edit:
if u wish i make more test on specific machines i suppose its better i send the results per mail? :-D
oh, i forgot, the 060 is regular 50mhz
-
I supppose it does not run in a standard A1200...
Can I help you anyway ?
-
First: Many thanks for your help!!!
Its real great to have a community of helpful people!!
To answer some questions:
The test needs 2MB free memory and it needs ixemul.library.
At the moment I have no idea why the test does not run on DJbase 020.
Thanks for your testing. I spotted an error in the test,
corrected it and added a some more CPU subtest. I have uploaded a new test file version (new version 4.2).
It would be cool to have some 030, 040 and 060 results with the V4.2 version of the test.
Framiga, maybe you can run the V4 test agin on your 060?
I'll post some CF results
Many thanks !!
-
biggun wrote:
To answer some questions:
The test needs 2MB free memory and it needs ixemul.library.
At the moment I have no idea why the test does not run on DJbase 020.
Could it be because its an 68ec020 on the card?
-
@biggun:
ok i will run the tests later today. by the way: i cant get your 194x working on the mediator/voodoo3 setup. "Unable to init SDL: Found no sufficiently capable CGX visuals". of course voodoo has an p96 driver but this should not be an issue, right? on picasso4 its working fine. any clues?
-
wawrzon wrote:
@biggun:
ok i will run the tests later today. by the way: i cant get your 194x working on the mediator/voodoo3 setup. "Unable to init SDL: Found no sufficiently capable CGX visuals". of course voodoo has an p96 driver but this should not be an issue, right? on picasso4 its working fine. any clues?
I'll make some native CyberGFX port when I have time.
This will run faster than SDL. :-)
To run it today, please tell me which screen modes have you got configured?
If I recall it correctly the game wants a 15 or 16 bit screen mode with 320x200 resolution.
If you do not have such screen mode configured then the game can not start.
Cheers
-
@DJBase
The "ec" only limits the address-range from 4GB to 16MB, so unless BigGun did add something strange (and on purpose) I don't see how it could have any effect.
-
with the new bench68K under AmigaOS3.9 (http://www.webalice.it/cieffeeditingvideo/a4k/Bench_OS3.9_new) ad under MOS for PowerUP (http://www.webalice.it/cieffeeditingvideo/a4k/Bench_MOS)
-
@biggun:
nope. that doesnt seem to be the problem. even with the defined 320x200 mode the error repeats. strange is that on another a4k with 060 und picasso4 the game works fine allthough no such mode is available. i have the same problem with owb. this has to have something to do with sdl and the voodoo driver.
-
I will bench my 1260@80mhz apollo then :-D
-
lets start the orgy then.
i still would like to see how an a4k and a1k2 030 behaves, but it occures all the a4ks have already 040 built in and i am too tired now to swap the cpu-board again. maybe tomorrow.
cheers
a4k_040-25 (fastram):
PROCESSOR: CPU 68040/68040fpu
CUSTOM CHIPS: AA PAL Alice (id=$0023), AA Lisa (id=$00F8)
VERS: Kickstart version 40.68, Exec version 40.10, Disk version 40.42
RAM: Node type $A, Attributes $505 (FAST), at $7000000-$7FFFFFF (16.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $703 (CHIP), at $1000-$1FFFFF (~2.0 meg)
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 1
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 21.9 21.9 21.5 21.3
shift 11.8 11.8 11.7 11.7
mix 21.7 21.6 21.8 21.2
mul 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
bra-un 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
bra-pre 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9
bsr 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4
nop 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 0.8
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.1
read 8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6
read 16 10.2 10.2 10.1 10.0
read 32 11.3 11.2 11.2 11.0
read 32x4 10.9 10.9 10.8 10.7
read 32x4B 11.3 11.2 11.2 11.0
write 8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5
write 16 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.1
write 32 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.2
write 32x4 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.2
write 32x4B 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.2
copy 8 5.9 5.8 5.6 4.7
copy 32 8.4 8.3 8.1 7.2
copy 32x4 8.0 7.9 7.9 7.6
copy 32x4B 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.4
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 8.4 8.7 9.7 39.0
read 8 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.4
read 16 10.2 10.4 11.0 12.9
read 32 11.2 11.8 14.0 25.7
read 32x4 10.9 11.7 15.2 51.3
read 32x4B 11.3 12.0 15.7 59.4
write 8 4.6 4.7 5.1 6.4
write 16 6.3 6.5 7.7 12.8
write 32 6.3 6.7 8.8 25.8
write 32x4 6.3 6.7 9.4 58.5
write 32x4B 6.3 6.7 9.1 34.3
copy 8 5.9 6.0 6.2 10.3
copy 32 8.4 8.6 9.5 40.7
copy 32x4 8.0 8.6 12.0 62.1
copy 32x4B 7.7 8.3 11.4 40.3
-------------------------------------------
a1k2_060-50 (blizzard1260):
PROCESSOR: CPU 68060/68060fpu/68060mmu
CUSTOM CHIPS: AA PAL Alice (id=$0023), AA Lisa (id=$00F8)
VERS: Kickstart version 39.106, Exec version 39.47, Disk version 39.29
RAM: Node type $A, Attributes $5 (FAST), at $68000000-$68FFFFFF (16.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $703 (CHIP), at $1000-$1FFFFF (~2.0 meg)
BOARDS:
Board + ROM (HD?) (unidentified): Prod=8512/17($2140/$11) (@$EA0000 128K)
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 3
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 90.7 90.6 89.3 84.8
shift 92.0 91.2 90.5 85.6
mix 91.7 91.1 89.9 84.9
mul 24.9 24.8 24.8 24.4
bra-un 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.4
bra-pre 31.6 31.5 31.4 30.9
bsr 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
nop 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.6
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.7
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 31.8 31.6 31.4 30.5
read 8 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.8
read 16 31.2 31.2 31.2 30.9
read 32 37.0 36.9 36.8 36.5
read 32x4 33.9 33.9 33.8 33.4
read 32x4B 37.0 36.9 36.8 36.4
write 8 23.9 23.9 23.9 23.6
write 16 25.3 25.3 25.2 25.1
write 32 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.1
write 32x4 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.1
write 32x4B 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.2
copy 8 22.6 22.3 21.5 21.8
copy 32 31.7 31.5 30.6 30.3
copy 32x4 30.1 30.0 29.8 28.7
copy 32x4B 29.5 29.4 29.3 28.2
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 31.8 30.6 173.7 184.8
read 8 19.9 20.6 25.4 25.5
read 16 31.2 34.8 97.1 99.9
read 32 37.0 42.0 184.3 197.1
read 32x4 33.9 38.0 125.6 131.3
read 32x4B 37.0 41.7 177.3 195.5
write 8 23.9 25.8 49.6 50.5
write 16 25.3 27.4 50.3 50.8
write 32 25.3 28.5 98.4 100.2
write 32x4 25.4 29.1 181.0 194.3
write 32x4B 25.3 28.9 150.0 158.5
copy 8 22.6 23.2 43.9 44.8
copy 32 31.7 33.6 177.0 192.9
copy 32x4 30.1 30.3 174.2 190.4
copy 32x4B 29.5 29.6 145.6 153.5
-------------------------------------------
a4k_060-50 (cyberstorm mk1):
PROCESSOR: CPU 68060/68060fpu/68060mmu
CUSTOM CHIPS: AA PAL Alice (id=$0023), AA Lisa (id=$00F8)
VERS: Kickstart version 40.68, Exec version 40.10, Disk version 45.3
RAM: Node type $A, Attributes $505 (FAST), at $8000000-$BFFFFFF (64.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $505 (FAST), at $7000000-$7FFFFFF (16.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $703 (CHIP), at $1000-$1FFFFF (~2.0 meg)
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 3
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 91.5 91.1 89.9 86.5
shift 92.4 91.1 90.6 85.9
mix 91.9 91.6 90.4 85.8
mul 25.0 25.0 25.0 24.5
bra-un 8.6 8.5 8.6 8.5
bra-pre 31.8 31.7 31.6 31.0
bsr 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9
nop 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.8
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.5 33.4 33.1 30.8
read 8 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.2
read 16 33.8 33.7 33.7 33.3
read 32 40.5 40.4 40.4 39.8
read 32x4 37.1 37.1 36.9 36.4
read 32x4B 40.5 40.4 40.3 39.6
write 8 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.0
write 16 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.6
write 32 26.9 26.9 27.0 26.7
write 32x4 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.7
write 32x4B 26.9 26.9 27.0 26.7
copy 8 23.3 23.1 22.2 22.9
copy 32 33.5 33.2 32.4 32.7
copy 32x4 32.4 32.3 32.1 31.6
copy 32x4B 31.2 31.1 30.9 30.4
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.6 32.4 173.5 185.8
read 8 20.4 20.9 25.5 25.7
read 16 33.8 37.3 97.3 100.7
read 32 40.5 45.6 185.8 197.6
read 32x4 37.2 41.3 127.7 132.3
read 32x4B 40.4 45.5 187.4 194.8
write 8 25.2 27.1 49.8 51.0
write 16 26.9 28.8 50.3 51.0
write 32 27.0 30.1 98.8 101.0
write 32x4 27.0 30.5 182.2 195.5
write 32x4B 26.9 30.4 149.8 158.2
copy 8 23.4 23.6 43.9 45.3
copy 32 33.6 35.2 178.8 193.7
copy 32x4 32.4 32.6 177.6 189.4
copy 32x4B 31.2 31.4 144.7 154.4
-------------------------------------------
-
Amiga 1200 with 3.0 roms and pci expantions
system "used WhichAmiga
Evaluating system...
Central Processing Unit: MC68060 80.0 MHz (rev 6)
Floating Point Unit: 68060fpu 80.0 MHz
Memory Management Unit: 68060mmu running
Custom graphics chip: AGA Lisa 4203 (rev 0)
Custom animation chip: AGA PAL Alice 8374 2M (rev 3-4)
Other custom chip(s): Paula 8364 (rev 0), Gayle (rev 13)
Graphics system: Picasso96
Hardware Clock: clock found, tuesday 18-mar-2008 22:52:36
Max. Chipmem available: 2048 K
Max. Fastmem available: 65536 K
ROM chip version: 39.106 (Kickstart 3.0)
Workbench version: 39.29 (Workbench 3.0)
SetPatch version: 43.6
Expansion board(s):
8738/35: Apollo A xx30-60 Turbo (@$00EA0000 128k)
2206/40: ELBOX-Computer Unknown Prod.ID #40 (@$00EC0000 128k)
2206/168: ELBOX-Computer Unknown Prod.ID #168 (@$00200000 8M)
Your computer is an Amiga 1200.
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 4
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 144.3 142.1 140.1 133.1
shift 136.8 141.9 138.9 131.1
mix 144.0 141.5 140.8 132.0
mul 38.9 38.8 38.7 38.0
bra-un 12.3 13.2 13.2 13.0
bra-pre 47.0 49.1 49.4 47.9
bsr 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
nop 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.8
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.2 32.9 32.2 30.5
read 8 25.4 25.4 25.3 25.1
read 16 35.3 35.2 35.2 34.3
read 32 39.5 39.5 39.2 38.6
read 32x4 37.4 37.2 37.1 36.3
read 32x4B 39.5 39.5 39.2 38.5
write 8 26.3 26.2 26.1 25.7
write 16 26.3 26.2 26.2 25.8
write 32 26.2 26.2 26.2 25.9
write 32x4 26.3 26.2 26.2 25.8
write 32x4B 26.3 26.2 26.2 25.8
copy 8 28.2 27.6 25.8 23.3
copy 32 33.2 32.8 32.0 29.9
copy 32x4 31.5 31.5 31.3 30.2
copy 32x4B 31.6 31.5 31.4 30.2
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 33.2 32.3 249.2 285.2
read 8 25.5 26.8 39.2 39.9
read 16 35.3 39.7 148.4 156.0
read 32 39.6 45.1 283.4 305.5
read 32x4 37.3 42.1 189.8 205.0
read 32x4B 39.7 44.9 273.2 305.4
write 8 26.2 28.9 75.9 78.8
write 16 26.3 29.0 77.0 79.0
write 32 26.3 29.7 148.7 156.3
write 32x4 26.3 30.0 268.4 306.6
write 32x4B 26.3 30.0 222.2 243.2
copy 8 28.2 28.6 67.1 70.2
copy 32 33.1 35.3 260.1 301.6
copy 32x4 31.6 31.9 257.1 296.1
copy 32x4B 31.6 31.9 210.5 242.5
-------------------------------------------
-
This is on my A1200 with 68030 and 32MB, no FPU
first sysinfo:
OPTIONAL HEADING STRING HERE
SysInfo V3.24 by Nic Wilson
---------------------------
CopyBack Mode................................ N/A
Instruction Cache............................ ON
Instruction Burst............................ ON
Data Cache................................... ON
Data Burst................................... OFF
Central Processing Unit Type................. 68030 (NOT IN USE)
Memory Management Unit Type.................. 68030 (NOT IN USE (NOT IN USE)
Floating Point Unit Type..................... NONE
Vector Base Register (VBR) Address........... $00000000
Ramsey Chip Revision (A3000)................. $6E
Gary Chip Revision (A3000)................... $D1
DMA/Gfx Chip................................. AGA ALICE - 2Meg
Display Mode................................. PAL:High Res
Display Chip................................. AGA LISA CHIP
VBlank Frequency in Hz....................... 50
Power Supply Frequency in Hz................. 50
Horizontal Frequency in KHz.................. 15.60
Card Slot Installed.......................... YES
Hardware Clock installed..................... CLOCK FOUND
EClockFrequency in Hz........................ 709379
SPEED COMPARISONS AGAINST KNOWN MODELS & PERIPHERALS
A500 512k or A600 with 1MB CHIP ONLY......... 15.89
B2000, A2000, A1000 or A500 with fast ram.... 12.02
A1200/14 68EC020 ICACHE 2MB CHIP ONLY........ 6.90
A2500/14 A2620 68020 card.................... 4.08
A3000/25 68030 ICACHE IBURST DCACHE NODBURST. 1.81
A4000/25 68040 ICACHE DCACHE COPYBACK........ 0.46
CPU Million Instructions per Second.......... 8.77
FPU Million Floating Operations per Second... N/A
Blitter Speed vs A4000-68040-25MHz........... 6.75
Speed of Chip Memory vs A600 Chip Memory..... 8408
Dhrystones per second........................ >>>>>>Acceleration
Nics Comment................................. 51.80
And now the output from bench68k :
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 1
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 19.5 20.5 19.6 19.1
shift 11.3 11.3 11.1 11.2
mix 20.4 20.3 20.1 19.5
mul 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8
bra-un 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2
bra-pre 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0
bsr 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
nop 20.4 20.4 20.4 19.7
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 4.9
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 22.7 21.1 22.3 21.8
read 8 3.9 3.6 3.9 3.9
read 16 7.3 7.2 7.3 7.3
read 32 12.6 12.1 12.7 12.7
read 32x4 16.6 16.3 16.5 16.4
read 32x4B 20.3 19.9 20.2 20.1
write 8 5.1 5.0 5.0 5.0
write 16 10.1 10.2 10.2 10.2
write 32 20.5 20.1 20.3 20.2
write 32x4 28.9 28.7 29.1 29.1
write 32x4B 22.2 20.3 22.0 22.2
copy 8 6.0 5.8 6.0 6.0
copy 32 23.7 23.7 23.9 23.8
copy 32x4 27.0 27.0 26.6 25.9
copy 32x4B 22.0 22.0 21.9 21.8
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 22.6 22.5 22.4 21.8
read 8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
read 16 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
read 32 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.7
read 32x4 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.4
read 32x4B 20.3 20.3 20.3 20.2
write 8 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
write 16 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2
write 32 20.4 20.4 20.4 20.3
write 32x4 29.0 29.1 28.9 29.1
write 32x4B 22.1 22.0 22.1 22.1
copy 8 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
copy 32 24.0 23.9 23.9 23.8
copy 32x4 27.1 26.9 26.8 26.0
copy 32x4B 21.8 22.0 21.9 21.7
-------------------------------------------
-
Hi this is the output from my A1200.
Good luck with Natami!!
WhichAmiga 1.3.3 (2.5.99)
Written by Harry "Piru" Sintonen. Copyright © 1995-1999 PitPlane Productions.
Evaluating system...
Central Processing Unit: MC68060 64.0 MHz (rev 6)
Floating Point Unit: 68060fpu
Memory Management Unit: 68060mmu running
Custom graphics chip: AGA Lisa 4203 (rev 0)
Custom animation chip: AGA PAL Alice 8374, rev 3-4
Other custom chip(s): Paula 8364 (rev 0), Gayle (rev 13)
Graphics system: Picasso96
Hardware Clock: clock found
Max. Chipmem available: 2048 K
Max. Fastmem available: 261120 K
ROM chip version: 40.68 (Kickstart 3.1)
ReKicked ROM, version: 45.57 (Kickstart unknown)
Workbench version: 45.3 (Workbench unknown)
SetPatch version: 44.38
Expansion board(s):
2206/32: ELBOX-Computer MEDIATOR PCI 1200 busboard (@$00EA0000 128k)
2206/160: ELBOX-Computer MEDIATOR PCI 1200 Memorywindow 4/8 MB (@$00200000 8M)
8512/110: Phase 5 Digital Products Blizzard PPC SCSI (@$00F00C38 128k)
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 4
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 117.4 117.2 115.2 108.3
shift 118.4 117.0 115.2 109.2
mix 117.9 116.5 114.2 108.8
mul 32.0 32.0 31.9 31.3
bra-un 10.9 10.8 10.8 10.7
bra-pre 40.7 40.7 40.4 39.2
bsr 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.0
nop 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 3.8
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 45.7 45.0 43.6 40.5
read 8 26.6 26.6 26.5 26.4
read 16 43.3 43.2 43.1 42.4
read 32 51.6 51.5 51.4 50.7
read 32x4 47.4 47.3 47.2 46.4
read 32x4B 51.4 51.5 51.3 50.4
write 8 32.0 32.1 31.9 31.5
write 16 36.8 36.8 36.7 36.3
write 32 36.8 36.8 36.8 36.4
write 32x4 36.9 36.8 36.7 36.4
write 32x4B 36.8 36.8 36.7 36.4
copy 8 30.6 30.3 29.6 28.0
copy 32 45.6 45.2 44.6 42.1
copy 32x4 43.0 42.8 42.6 41.3
copy 32x4B 42.1 41.9 41.8 40.5
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 45.7 44.0 223.5 238.9
read 8 26.6 27.3 32.6 32.8
read 16 43.2 47.7 124.6 128.4
read 32 51.6 58.1 235.9 250.2
read 32x4 47.3 52.5 162.5 168.8
read 32x4B 51.6 58.2 240.4 248.6
write 8 32.1 34.3 63.1 64.5
write 16 36.8 39.2 64.5 65.3
write 32 36.9 41.0 125.8 129.0
write 32x4 36.8 41.9 234.6 249.8
write 32x4B 36.9 41.7 190.1 202.0
copy 8 30.6 29.0 55.9 57.8
copy 32 45.7 44.1 225.0 244.4
copy 32x4 43.0 43.9 226.0 242.4
copy 32x4B 42.0 42.8 186.4 196.4
-------------------------------------------
-
Can't run it on my 2MB A600, even with nothing but DH0: enabled, booting with no startup sequence etc. I bet it doesn't work on a 68000 anyway.... its so old! lol
-
wawrzon wrote:
lets start the orgy then.
i still would like to see how an a4k and a1k2 030 behaves, but it occures all the a4ks have already 040 built in and i am too tired now to swap the cpu-board again. maybe tomorrow.
cheers
a1k2_040-50 (blizzard?):
PROCESSOR: CPU 68040/68882fpu
CUSTOM CHIPS: AA PAL Alice (id=$0023), AA Lisa (id=$00F8)
VERS: Kickstart version 39.106, Exec version 39.47, Disk version 39.29
RAM: Node type $A, Attributes $5 (FAST), at $68000000-$68FFFFFF (16.0 meg)
Node type $A, Attributes $703 (CHIP), at $1000-$1FFFFF (~2.0 meg)
BOARDS:
Board + ROM (HD?) (unidentified): Prod=8512/17($2140/$11) (@$EA0000 128K)
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 3
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 90.7 90.6 89.3 84.8
shift 92.0 91.2 90.5 85.6
mix 91.7 91.1 89.9 84.9
mul 24.9 24.8 24.8 24.4
bra-un 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.4
bra-pre 31.6 31.5 31.4 30.9
bsr 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
nop 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.6
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.7
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 31.8 31.6 31.4 30.5
read 8 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.8
read 16 31.2 31.2 31.2 30.9
read 32 37.0 36.9 36.8 36.5
read 32x4 33.9 33.9 33.8 33.4
read 32x4B 37.0 36.9 36.8 36.4
write 8 23.9 23.9 23.9 23.6
write 16 25.3 25.3 25.2 25.1
write 32 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.1
write 32x4 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.1
write 32x4B 25.3 25.3 25.3 25.2
copy 8 22.6 22.3 21.5 21.8
copy 32 31.7 31.5 30.6 30.3
copy 32x4 30.1 30.0 29.8 28.7
copy 32x4B 29.5 29.4 29.3 28.2
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 31.8 30.6 173.7 184.8
read 8 19.9 20.6 25.4 25.5
read 16 31.2 34.8 97.1 99.9
read 32 37.0 42.0 184.3 197.1
read 32x4 33.9 38.0 125.6 131.3
read 32x4B 37.0 41.7 177.3 195.5
write 8 23.9 25.8 49.6 50.5
write 16 25.3 27.4 50.3 50.8
write 32 25.3 28.5 98.4 100.2
write 32x4 25.4 29.1 181.0 194.3
write 32x4B 25.3 28.9 150.0 158.5
copy 8 22.6 23.2 43.9 44.8
copy 32 31.7 33.6 177.0 192.9
copy 32x4 30.1 30.3 174.2 190.4
copy 32x4B 29.5 29.6 145.6 153.5
-------------------------------------------
Hi,
Are you sure that this is a 68040 system?
Your result looks 100% like a 50MHz 68060.
A 68060 can execute 2 instructions per clock.
Which means that a 50 MHz 060 will reach 90-100 in the first three CPU tests (addi,shift,mix)
A 68060 only needs 2 clocks for a multiplication, which means it will reach a score of 25 in mul test.
A 68040 would be much slower at the same clockspeed.
Cheers
-
This is from another Apollo 1260/80 MHz system:
addi 148.1 147.1 144.7 136.5
shift 148.3 147.6 145.0 136.7
mix 147.9 147.6 145.1 136.1
mul 40.4 40.3 40.1 39.4
bra-un 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.7
bra-pre 51.3 51.1 50.9 49.8
bsr 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4
nop 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.1
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.9
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 34.5 34.4 34.2 33.1
read 8 26.5 26.4 26.3 26.0
read 16 36.6 36.5 36.4 35.8
read 32 41.2 41.0 40.9 40.1
read 32x4 38.7 38.7 38.5 37.9
read 32x4B 41.2 41.0 40.9 40.1
write 8 27.3 27.3 27.2 26.8
write 16 27.3 27.3 27.2 26.9
write 32 27.4 27.3 27.2 27.0
write 32x4 27.3 27.3 27.2 26.9
write 32x4B 27.3 27.3 27.2 26.9
copy 8 29.3 29.2 29.0 28.1
copy 32 34.5 34.4 34.2 33.1
copy 32x4 32.8 32.7 32.5 31.4
copy 32x4B 32.8 32.7 32.5 31.4
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 34.5 33.7 259.1 297.6
read 8 26.5 27.9 40.8 41.4
read 16 36.6 41.0 153.8 161.4
read 32 41.2 47.0 287.9 314.7
read 32x4 38.8 43.6 196.3 212.1
read 32x4B 41.1 47.1 273.3 311.5
write 8 27.3 30.1 79.1 81.9
write 16 27.3 30.2 80.2 82.2
write 32 27.3 31.0 154.6 161.9
write 32x4 27.3 31.3 282.3 314.1
write 32x4B 27.4 31.2 232.5 253.2
copy 8 29.3 30.0 70.0 72.7
copy 32 34.5 36.5 268.5 308.4
copy 32x4 32.8 33.0 262.7 303.6
copy 32x4B 32.8 33.0 220.4 247.7
-------------------------------------------
-
biggun wrote:
The test needs 2MB free memory and it needs ixemul.library.
And where can one find that library?
-
Here is the result of the Coldfire 54455@266MHz
The 54455 is an embedded CF with 16bit bus.
I think the 266MHz V4m is CPU wise roughly comparable
to a 68060 with 130 MHz
to a 68040 with 280 MHz
to a 68030 with 600 MHz
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 4.2 MB.
Calibration loops: 8
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 251.3 251.3 251.3 251.3
shift 293.2 293.2 251.3 251.3
mix 439.8 439.8 439.8 439.8
mul 67.7 67.7 67.7 65.2
bra-un 41.9 42.9 40.9 41.9
bra-pre 117.3 117.3 117.3 109.9
bsr 13.3 13.4 13.3 13.2
nop 45.1 44.0 44.0 44.0
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 1.0
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 67.7 67.7 66.4 56.7
read 8 81.8 74.9 74.9 69.0
read 16 95.1 95.1 95.1 88.0
read 32 121.3 121.3 117.3 109.9
read 32x4 121.3 121.3 121.3 106.6
read 32x4B 121.3 121.3 117.3 106.6
write 8 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.0
write 16 26.1 26.1 26.1 25.5
write 32 51.0 51.0 51.0 48.9
write 32x4 51.7 51.0 51.0 48.9
write 32x4B 185.2 185.2 175.9 153.0
copy 8 23.3 23.3 23.3 22.0
copy 32 67.7 67.7 67.7 57.7
copy 32x4 65.2 65.2 65.2 55.8
copy 32x4B 117.3 121.3 117.3 90.2
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 2MB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 67.7 106.6 106.6 103.5
read 8 74.9 92.6 140.7 135.3
read 16 92.6 125.7 219.9 219.9
read 32 121.3 175.9 586.4 502.6
read 32x4 121.3 185.2 703.7 703.7
read 32x4B 121.3 185.2 879.6 879.6
write 8 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.3
write 16 26.1 26.7 26.7 26.7
write 32 51.0 53.3 53.3 52.5
write 32x4 51.0 53.3 53.3 53.3
write 32x4B 185.2 207.0 207.0 207.0
copy 8 23.1 23.8 26.7 26.7
copy 32 67.7 100.5 106.6 103.5
copy 32x4 65.2 103.5 106.6 103.5
copy 32x4B 117.3 439.8 390.9 390.9
-------------------------------------------
-
@biggun: "Are you sure that this is a 68040 system?"
my mistake! sure its 060 (corrected), ive only turned it yesterday for the first time since a year and didnt realize the old showconfig desnt recognize the cpu properly.
do you still need an a4k 030 benchmark? (i dont think so)
the results of the test are not really in favour of the coldfire. am i right that it doesnt contain a fpu unit? (which would render it still little less usable)
-
wawrzon wrote:
@biggun: "Are you sure that this is a 68040 system?"
my mistake! sure its 060 (corrected), ive only turned it yesterday for the first time since a year and didnt realize the old showconfig desnt recognize the cpu properly.
do you still need an a4k 030 benchmark? (i dont think so)
the results of the test are not really in favour of the coldfire. am i right that it doesnt contain a fpu unit? (which would render it still little less usable)
A 030@25Mhz would be interesting but only if its no hassle.
>the results of the test are not really in favour of the coldfire.
> am i right that it doesnt contain a fpu unit
The 54455 is the tiniest of the V4 Coldfires.
It has no FPU and only a 16 Bit bus.
There are other V4 Coldfires available that have more on chip cache, that have a FPU and that have 32Bit memory bus.
And the used V4m is a bit handicapped by the memory on dev-board. The memory is 16-bit and its DD2 memory.
Using DD2 memory makes sense if you have a very high clocked CPU. When you use it with a rather low clocked CPU the result will only be that you increase the memory latency.
A V4 with better memory (32bit) will have noticeable higher memory performance.
I leaning to use the V5 Coldfire.
From what I have read about the V5 Coldfire, I understand that the CPU performance should be about 3 times faster than the tested V4m.
Cheers
-
Seems there are sertin tests dealing with cache 2 cache that proves to be faster on a real 060 what is the reason for this ? V5 write 8 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.3 my 060 write 8 26.2 28.9 75.9 78.
-
@last: the 030/25mhz
the machine has only 6megs ram since im just putting it together but as far as i recall from previous tests the amount of memory is not significant.
Central Processing Unit: MC68EC030 24.8 MHz
Floating Point Unit: MC68882
Memory Management Unit: not available
Custom graphics chip: AGA Lisa 4203 (rev 0)
Custom animation chip: AGA PAL Alice 8374, rev 3-4
Other custom chip(s): Paula 8364 (rev 0), Ramsey (rev 15), Gary (rev 0), Gayle (rev 8)
Graphics system: Amiga AGA display bandwidth: 4x
Hardware Clock: clock found
Max. Chipmem available: 2048 K
Max. Fastmem available: 4096 K
ROM chip version: 40.68 (Kickstart 3.1)
Workbench version: 40.42 (Workbench 3.1)
SetPatch version: 40.16
Your computer is an Amiga 4000.
-------------------------------------------
Processor & Memory Performance Bench v4.20
-------------------------------------------
Stop all program before the test.
Do not use the computer during the test.
The test will run some minutes, please be patient.
Total memory required = 1.0 MB.
Calibration loops: 2
-------------------------------------------
Comparing different CPU functions:
Results are in million instructions per sec.
Higher value is faster.
CPU-Benchmark 512KB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
addi 10.1 10.1 9.9 9.2
shift 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5
mix 10.1 10.1 10.1 9.4
mul 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
bra-un 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
bra-pre 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
bsr 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
nop 10.2 10.1 10.1 9.5
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory latency:
Result is Million random accesses per sec.
Higher value is faster.
Memory Latency 512KB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
random read 2.4
-------------------------------------------
Measuring memory throughput:
Results are in MB/sec. Higher value is faster.
Memory 2 Memory
Alignment 0-0 512KB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 11.3 11.2 11.1 10.7
read 8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9
read 16 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
read 32 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
read 32x4 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.0
read 32x4B 10.1 10.1 10.1 9.9
write 8 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3
write 16 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.0
write 32 10.1 10.1 10.1 9.9
write 32x4 13.9 14.3 14.3 14.0
write 32x4B 11.5 11.5 11.4 11.3
copy 8 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9
copy 32 11.7 11.8 11.8 11.6
copy 32x4 13.4 13.3 13.2 12.6
copy 32x4B 11.1 11.2 11.1 10.7
-------------------------------------------
Cache 2 Cache
Alignment 0-0 512KB 16KB 4KB 1KB
-------------------------------------------
glibc memcpy 11.2 11.3 11.2 10.8
read 8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9
read 16 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
read 32 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
read 32x4 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.0
read 32x4B 10.1 10.1 10.0 9.9
write 8 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3
write 16 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0
write 32 10.1 10.1 10.0 10.0
write 32x4 14.1 14.3 14.3 13.9
write 32x4B 11.4 11.5 11.4 11.3
copy 8 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9
copy 32 11.9 11.8 11.7 11.6
copy 32x4 13.1 13.2 13.0 12.7
copy 32x4B 11.1 11.1 11.1 10.8
-------------------------------------------
-
Thanks for all your help.
The information is very useful to me.
I made some stats out of the results I feel they provide a good overview. I'm not sure how to best visualize this here.
In short:
The 68K emul on MOS-PPC seems to more efficient than on x86-UAE (clock by clock).
A 1000 MHz G4 is about as effective in 68k emulation as a Core2Duo with 1500 Mhz.
The 16bit-Coldfire-V4m is performance wise roughly
in the middle between original 68060@50 and AONE@1000Mhz running 68k-Jit.
Cheers
Gunnar
-
but... i thought multicore cpus arent supported by uae anyway. in this case the correct statement would be that 1500mhz x86 equals 1000mhz g4 in executing 68k code?
-
@biggun
Forget all this benchmarking stuff, I have a question... is that woman in the pic your other half? If it is, I think if I were you I would be on my Amiga less and in the bedroom more!
Scheeerwinggggg!
-
a1200 wrote:
@biggun
Forget all this benchmarking stuff, I have a question... is that woman in the pic your other half?
LOL.
Yes this is Anja my wife. :-)
BTW I've been through this already, we have two kids now.
-
adonay wrote:
Seems there are sertin tests dealing with cache 2 cache that proves to be faster on a real 060 what is the reason for this ? V5 write 8 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.3 my 060 write 8 26.2 28.9 75.9 78.
To prevent any misunderstandings,
the CF that I've tested was not the V5 but the V4m.
(I'm still a waiting to get the my V5 board)
You are absolutely right with your observation:
"write 8 13.2 13.3 13.3 13.3"
This looks very suspicious.
I think the memory of the V4 is setup differently to the other machine.
I looks to me is the V4m is set up to "write through" instead of "copyback mode". I'm probably measuring something complete wrong here.
I'll check this