Amiga.org

The "Not Quite Amiga but still computer related category" => Amiga Emulation => Topic started by: DaryASYS on November 18, 2007, 07:08:52 PM

Title: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 18, 2007, 07:08:52 PM
AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0

I received a title yesterday : : AmiKIT Benchmark....

AmigaSYS Amikit,AIAB or Amiga 4000 , comparison, with the statement that he is AmiKIT safe in a manner very fast , and AmigaSYS does not approach it yet.

I look at this I said it, and I test it somewhat in detail AmigaSYS and Amikit pair one. We look at it what knows the high-end Classic Amiga environment = AmiKIT, against AmigaSYS working by few supports. Of course with pictures :)

(http://amigasys.extra.hu/eng/teszt7l.jpg)

Test config :

AMD Athlon 3200 , 1 GB Dual Channel DDR400, SATA, Nvidia GForce FX 6.
AmigaSYS 3 Plus default config.
Amikit 1.4.0 default config.
WinUAE 1.4.4.

1. test Windows install time
2. test ( Os 3.9 installs time) / H&P,Amithlon, Amiga Forever 2006
3. test boot time
4. test Amigod 2 / Intution / Memory /SAFE modes
5. test TMPEG ENC 60 MB Wav encode 128 Kbit MP3
6. test 30 MB LHA Unpack RAM
7. test 30 MB LHA Unpack HD.
8. test games. / NAPALM /NIGHTLONG / QUAKE AGA / QUAKE GL.
9. test platforms support.

The test not cheating , anybody who may rehearse it. I have an opinion , but I do not say it rather :) The pictures/numbers relate it. I anyway AmigaSYS I recommend it!

If you do not know the AmigaSYS try it!

Pictures and test results :

http://amigasys.extra.hu
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: ChaosLord on November 18, 2007, 07:24:26 PM
Hooray for AmigaSYS!

But you forgot to test Hippoplayer.  Do mods play correctly with it?
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 18, 2007, 07:32:54 PM
I did not test it , AmigaSYS works it well. Amikit i dont know, I deleted it :)
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 18, 2007, 08:10:04 PM
Example : - The music from WOC92 by Sanity is played during installation  :)
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: AmiKit on November 18, 2007, 08:49:38 PM
Well, when I was using AmiGOD I noticed that the same tests on the same config always gave different result. That's why I did the same tests 5 times in a row, the highest and the lowest values were omitted, the rest was averaged.

Another methodological flaw of your tests is that you compare the uncomparable, actually: the Windows directory vs. Hardfile. That's a complete different method of storing the files affecting the speed of accessing files. The hardfile is always faster, naturally. This issue affects your tests number 1, 2, 3, 7 and maybe 5 as well.

And what about 9, the platform test? What kind of test is that? Maybe some kind of "Feature test" or "Support test" or "User-friendly test" would be more interesting.

Quote
AmigaSYS 3 Plus the Winner!
High-end Classic Amiga environment = AmiKIT the loser.
The test not cheating , anybody who may rehearse it. I have an opinion , but I do not say it rather :) The pictures/numbers relate it. I anyway AmigaSYS I recommend it!

Congratulations!
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: jmbattle on November 18, 2007, 09:46:23 PM
Well, even if the benchmarks are accurate, the screenshots on the right hand side look bloody awful.

Cheers,
James
x
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 18, 2007, 09:47:05 PM
@AmiKit

The testing lasted until 0.5 day. He was tested many times , yet the 3.9 setups.

Test 1 , 2 , 3, 7 = HDF faster , than DIR , you use it not I.
Test 5 = AmigaSYS and Amikit also using DIR, Not HDF.
"Test" 9 = support platforms. (he is miswritten here , see webpage)

The test is not about going down.
Between the 2 packets of this size the difference.

If he is DIR, if not...
This 2 packets and will use it with values like this if somebody downloads it.

thx your gratulation , but my opinion it exaggeration "AmiKit -turns your computer into high-end Classic Amiga environment!" , according to me very slow , overcrowded system, (athlon 3200+1 gb ram = slow ?), the pictures/numbers relate it.

In this manner to publish ? That 1 game is going ? This the high-end Classic Amiga environment!?

You read it the feature lists ? I got accustomed to it , between 2 systems the difference those many rows written down. I do not think of the programs , but onto the opportunities and the system onto corrections. At what right, let him be quickly, faultless useful. All two systems somebody (DOPUS/WB) else , but then.

I do not say this because of that because I do it AmigaSYS.

Excuse me , if I wrote bad one into my not stood intention , but the English language broke always yet.

Dary
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 18, 2007, 09:48:23 PM
Everybody uses it what he wants, I indicated that he is not all gold simply what gleams.
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 19, 2007, 09:57:34 AM
web page correction , the test times not , second but minute (sec rewrite minutes). Sorry...
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: ChaosLord on November 19, 2007, 11:03:34 AM
Neither AmiKit nor AmigaSYS are any good unless they can run a standard AmigaOS game such as Total Chaos AGA.  A game which uses a huge amount of Intuition(tm) Magic.
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 19, 2007, 12:39:24 PM
I looked at it in AmigaSYS , works totally well.
Os3.0,3.1,3.9..
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 20, 2007, 11:02:11 AM
@AmiKit


I deleted it the "loser etc" text (webpage).
Sorry I answered your test , somewhat better (more tests).
And there is not a cheating.

Dary
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: XDelusion on November 23, 2007, 05:04:32 PM
I like them both, they both run well for me! :)
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: amigadave on November 23, 2007, 05:51:38 PM
@DaryASYS,

Well Dary, I was considering trying your AmigaSYS 3, but after reading your posts and apparent gloating over your attempt to show that it runs faster than AmiKit, I have no desire to download, install, or ever donate any money to your project.  AmiKit runs great on my PC, the best Amiga emulation I have ever seen or used and I have never seen such an arrogant attitude by AmiKit's developer.

With such an attitude and attacks on other Amiga developers, or projects, I think AmigaSYS will be the loser in the long run.  What a shame.

P.S. This is not an attack, but you need help with your translations to English as most of what you write makes no sense to English readers.
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 23, 2007, 07:01:52 PM
It you are useful what you want. The side will be written totally again (English, German , Hungarian).

Onto AMIKIT test this was the answer , I did not start. May be you did not realize this because of my bad English.

I do not like it if into a forum AmigaSYS into a bad colour it is indicated , while did not test. Than for example you. You do not know it we this, then we you decide on his basis ? I do this for you , not for myself , and you did not try it? From this direction this much.

I do not believe in the fact that we should talk about a competition , this was only 1 test. You rehearsed it never , then we you make remarks on his basis ?

You should try it first. And you would look at it in what there is more work , not to disparage the other one. I mention it simply AmigaSYS onto 10 systems is official!

Bribe it your money onto your hair, do not look at it AMIGASYS , I do not do it for people like this who does not try it yet , you can tell a story...
Title: Re: AmigaSYS 3 Plus VS AmiKIT 1.4.0 Benchmark.
Post by: DaryASYS on November 23, 2007, 08:20:14 PM
Before everybody would accuse me :

http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22836&forum=8#370177

I answered this. In case you say it this an attack. This was only 1 answer. I did not start the resembling. Everybody onto a half speaks. I answered simply.