Amiga.org

Coffee House => Coffee House Boards => CH / General => Topic started by: X-ray on March 18, 2007, 07:09:13 PM

Title: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: X-ray on March 18, 2007, 07:09:13 PM
Well chaps, I have a brand new rifle. I cleaned it and fired a few shots on Friday. Today I got used to the trigger and found out what it likes to eat.
Here is a 10-shot group at 25m, fired today:

(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g154/Odd_Job/R55TenexGroup.jpg)

US 1c coin on the left, UK 5p coin on the right, for easy scale. Even the smaller 5p coin can cover that group.
Not bad for a semi, eh?
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: Karlos on March 18, 2007, 07:14:57 PM
Oooh. Excuse me one moment whilst I combat a sudden attack of gland stiffness...
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: CannonFodder on March 18, 2007, 07:16:04 PM
...and excuse me one moment whilst I combat a sudden attack of trouser stickiness...
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: Karlos on March 18, 2007, 07:17:32 PM
Quote

CannonFodder wrote:
...and excuse me one moment whilst I combat a sudden attack of trouser stickiness...


Well that ruined my reply :lol:
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: X-ray on March 18, 2007, 07:19:00 PM
"...Oooh. Excuse me one moment whilst I combat a sudden attack of gland stiffness..."
---------------------------------------------------------

Don't be premature my mate, you haven't seen the rifle yet  :-P
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: Karlos on March 18, 2007, 07:20:06 PM
Be still my throbbing... er I mean beating heart.
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: X-ray on March 18, 2007, 07:26:19 PM
"...Be still my throbbing... er I mean beating heart..."
---------------------------------------------------------

You may laugh, but nobody was really interested in the rifle until they saw the groups. There was a couple in lane 3 and 4 firing some lever action .38s and they are now interested in that .22
They won't be getting it in a rush though, 'cos you have to jump through MANY hoops before you even get the Firearms Certificate. They were using club guns.
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: metalman on March 19, 2007, 03:34:45 AM
@xray

 Precise, and almost Accurate!  (http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/distance/sci122/SciLab/L5/accprec.html) :-P
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: motrucker on March 19, 2007, 05:54:08 AM
I prefer freehand, with my old .44 Cal Navy Colt Repro.
or fast draw......
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: X-ray on March 19, 2007, 07:01:18 AM
@ Metalman

Ja, that was an early group, before the scope was set.

@ Motrucker

Is that a black powder gun? I have a slot for a .44 black powder and I am looking for tips.
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: leema1290 on March 19, 2007, 05:16:55 PM
I'm pretty sure you should have been aiming at the centre of the target, I'm sure that's what my dad (Mike Jenvey) said, and he tends to win things at Bisley so...
 :-P
Title: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: X-ray on April 11, 2007, 10:32:37 PM
Speaking of semi-autos, I got to handle a rifle of significant presence and history in Colorado recently. I suspect that if our friend Odin hasn't already done so, he would jump at the chance.
I'll give you two clues:

1) Designed by a Canadian
2) Ping!

 :-D
Title: Re: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: meega on April 11, 2007, 10:41:06 PM
Why do you need a 'scope at 25 metres?
Title: Re: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: X-ray on April 11, 2007, 10:57:29 PM
Because at 25m that black circle (everything within the 7 ring) is just a black spot, when looking through irons. If you have a smaller spot, you might get good grouping like that with a bolt action and peep sights, but the rifle in question has no iron sights at all. It is made for a scope only. Next step is 50m, possibly 100m after that.
Title: Re: Not bad for a semi-auto
Post by: T_Bone on April 12, 2007, 01:56:51 AM
What rifle is that?
Title: Re: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: odin on April 12, 2007, 03:13:25 AM
Heh, I didn't know that it was a Canadian guy and to be honest I think I'd be much more excited getting my hands on a K98 or a Mosin-Nagant derivative. Although that ping does have a charm =).

(Er...did I ever say something which led to believe that I'd jump at the chance to fire an M1 Garand?).
Title: Re: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: X-ray on April 12, 2007, 10:03:12 AM
@ T-Bone

It is a Thompson Center R55 Benchmark.

@ Odin

Good job, you guessed it right. I knew you were a milsurp kind of guy. Like I told the guy who owns the Garand, "it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that ping."
His Garand is a 1942 model and it has seen action in WW2. It was rebarrelled in the 50s but the reciever is original. Who knows what stories that rifle could tell...
Title: Re: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: Doobrey on April 12, 2007, 05:38:03 PM
@X-Ray,
 Looks like your earlier attempts were caught on video (http://youtube.com/watch?v=zgliDavLY9Y) :-D
Title: Re: One for Odin (was 'not bad for a semi-auto')
Post by: X-ray on April 12, 2007, 05:54:45 PM
hehe

That is a .577 T-Rex. It looks like it has 'brisk' recoil.