Amiga.org

Coffee House => Coffee House Boards => CH / General => Topic started by: iamaboringperson on August 26, 2005, 07:39:08 AM

Title: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: iamaboringperson on August 26, 2005, 07:39:08 AM
There would be too much of what people don't want, and not enough of what they do!
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: PMC on August 26, 2005, 07:59:24 AM
WTF?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: bloodline on August 26, 2005, 01:17:52 PM
IIRC there is actually a socialist supermarket... it's called the Co-Op, though the words "market" and "socailist" are by definition mutualy exclusive... But anyway iama's expression is wrong.

To make it correct, one should say: "For every product someone takes from the store*, that person must provide the store with one or more different products. All products must be necessities, not luxuaries. *Addendum; the product removed must be approved for removal, so no one takes more than they need."

Not as much fun as your local capitalist market though...  ;-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 26, 2005, 04:25:23 PM
Quote

iamaboringperson wrote:
There would be too much of what people don't want, and not enough of what they do!



http://www.cooponline.coop/about.html (http://www.cooponline.coop/about.html)

Quote
What is a Co-op?

Definition
The International Co-operative Alliance defines a co-operative as -

'an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically controlled enterprise.'

In other words, co-ops are in business to provide what their members want, and they are controlled democratically by their members.

Co-ops compared to plcs

    * A co-operative is set up to meet mutual needs whereas a plc exists to make a profit from being able to satisfy a need that exists.
    * A co-operative belongs to its members. A plc belongs to its shareholders/ investors.
    * A co-operative is run democratically on the basis of one member, one vote.
    * In a plc the number of shares owned determines votes.
    * Co-operatives share their profits with their members (the dividend) whereas plcs return profits to the holders of their capital.
    * Shares that members have in a co-operative are of fixed value and withdrawable. Shares are non-withdrawable in plcs and their value fluctuates.
    * Co-ops are constituted under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act whereas plcs are constituted under company law.

*
   *



Try again iama.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Cyberus on August 26, 2005, 04:54:23 PM
I'm a member of the Co-op. I paid £1 for membership, and am a real fan of it. The first supermarket in the UK to use biodegradable carrier bags, the first to stock fair trade goods I THINK, the only one of the supermarkets targeting lower income households (the other being Somerfield, Asda and Morrisons) to actively seek to promote healthier eating....

Yep, I am a real Co-Op fan. I like it when someone proves to the big boys that you can be conscientious and economically viable, when the first thing they scream is always that it doesn't make economic sense.

Also, the co-operative bank does not invest in non-ethical companies (defence companies, etc)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 26, 2005, 04:59:36 PM
Quote

Cyberus wrote:
I'm a member of the Co-op. I paid £1 for membership, and am a real fan of it. The first supermarket in the UK to use biodegradable carrier bags, the first to stock fair trade goods I THINK, the only one of the supermarkets targeting lower income households (the other being Somerfield, Asda and Morrisons) to actively seek to promote healthier eating....

Yep, I am a real Co-Op fan. I like it when someone proves to the big boys that you can be conscientious and economically viable, when the first thing they scream is always that it doesn't make economic sense.

Also, the co-operative bank does not invest in non-ethical companies (defence companies, etc)


I'll make a socialist out of you yet Cyberus! :-D
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Wilse on August 26, 2005, 06:03:58 PM
Glad to see IAABP is still around.

How's it hanging? Still homophobic or was that just a silly
phase you were going through? ;-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 26, 2005, 06:14:46 PM
Quote

Wilse wrote:
Glad to see IAABP is still around.

How's it hanging? Still homophobic or was that just a silly
phase you were going through? ;-)


Maybe he's come through it and embraced his own homosexuality now? ;-)

Maybe he even got laid?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Cyberus on August 26, 2005, 06:32:50 PM
You mean, "Have a nice \^/@|\||< ?"

;-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on August 26, 2005, 06:33:39 PM
Quote

mdma wrote:
Maybe he even got laid?
NOT BY ME!
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 26, 2005, 06:34:41 PM
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
Maybe he even got laid?
NOT BY ME!


:roflmao:

Maybe he went on holiday to the Dam and visited one of those state-run whorehouses? ;-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 26, 2005, 06:36:13 PM
Quote

Cyberus wrote:
You mean, "Have a nice \^/@|\||< ?"

;-)


Maybe it was Vietnam then?

"Ten dollar fooky, five dollar sucky, three dollar wanky.  Me love you long time!" ;-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: iamaboringperson on August 27, 2005, 02:14:10 AM
@bloodline (& others)

I've used at least one (and am a member of a) co-op.

But believe me, it's definitely not socialist.

But my theory is certainly not wrong, however. Well, not entirely, anyway.

Thoughout the past 100 years or so, socialist "supermarkets" or food shops really did not have much that people wanted. But they didn't have an awfull lot of what people didn't want, either (except perhaps, empty space...).

 :-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 27, 2005, 02:29:53 AM
Quote

But believe me, it's definitely not socialist.


They are run by the members, for the benefit of the members, and all profit is distributed to the members.

Please tell me how this is not socialist?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: iamaboringperson on August 27, 2005, 02:59:30 AM
Quote

mdma wrote:
Quote

But believe me, it's definitely not socialist.


They are run by the members, for the benefit of the members, and all profit is distributed to the members.

Please tell me how this is not socialist?


Well firstly I don't get so much as one cent from the co-op of which I am a member. One reason for that is that it is "not for profit".

A coop is normally a private organization. And if it is, then according to the definition of socialism, it is not socialist.

And that is why I say it's not.

Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 27, 2005, 03:03:24 AM
Quote

iamaboringperson wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
Quote

But believe me, it's definitely not socialist.


They are run by the members, for the benefit of the members, and all profit is distributed to the members.

Please tell me how this is not socialist?


Well firstly I don't get so much as one cent from the co-op of which I am a member. One reason for that is that it is "not for profit".



Then it is not a co-op.  It may say it is, but it isn't.


Quote

A coop is normally a private organization. And if it is, then according to the definition of socialism, it is not socialist.



Wrong.  

I shall repeat part of what I quoted earlier:-


Quote

 * Co-operatives share their profits with their members (the dividend) whereas plcs return profits to the holders of their capital.
* Shares that members have in a co-operative are of fixed value and withdrawable. Shares are non-withdrawable in plcs and their value fluctuates.
* Co-ops are constituted under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act whereas plcs are constituted under company law.



Quote

And that is why I say it's not.



Doesn't make you right though.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Elektro on August 27, 2005, 10:32:04 AM
Quote

A coop is normally a private organization. And if it is, then according to the definition of socialism, it is not socialist.


Wrong. That is the definiton of communism.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: whabang on August 27, 2005, 11:28:11 AM
Here in Sweden we have a whole chain of stores founded on the principles of Socialism. Since they are the largest (possibly the 2nd largest)chain of supermarkets in the country, I suppose they are doing something right...
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Karlos on August 27, 2005, 08:07:03 PM
Quote

iamaboringperson wrote:
There would be too much of what people don't want, and not enough of what they do!


So, iama, if you ran a supermarket, what would you stock?




*Apart from firearms, ammunition and accesories, I mean? :-P
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 27, 2005, 08:17:47 PM
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Quote

iamaboringperson wrote:
There would be too much of what people don't want, and not enough of what they do!


So, iama, if you ran a supermarket, what would you stock?




*Apart from firearms, ammunition and accesories, I mean? :-P


Anal lube and nipple clamps?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Karlos on August 27, 2005, 08:20:04 PM
Ouch. Still, better than nipple lube and anal clamps, I guess :lol:
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 27, 2005, 08:23:05 PM
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Ouch. Still, better than nipple lube and anal clamps, I guess :lol:


Are anal clamps used to restrict blood flow to haemorroids?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Karlos on August 27, 2005, 08:24:53 PM
What, strangulating the old Farmer Giles, eh?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 27, 2005, 08:31:55 PM
Quote

Karlos wrote:
What, strangulating the old Farmer Giles, eh?


Is that a euphimism for auto-erotic aspyhixiation?

It's quite popular in Australia I hear.  Ask Michael Hutchence! ;-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Karlos on August 27, 2005, 08:36:54 PM
Prrrrrrpft :lol: :roflmao:
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: X-ray on August 27, 2005, 09:42:39 PM
Aha!!

There's hope for Bloodline and me yet...we had nothing to do with the lowering of tone in this thread  :angel:
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on August 27, 2005, 10:09:23 PM
Quote

X-ray wrote:
Aha!!

There's hope for Bloodline and me yet...we had nothing to do with the lowering of tone in this thread  :angel:


Well, I wonder if iama will sell protein enriched socks in his supermarket?
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Cyberus on August 28, 2005, 09:14:43 PM
No, because the wanking-class will get exploited
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: metalman on August 30, 2005, 01:49:24 AM
Quote

Cyberus wrote:
No, because the wanking-class will get exploited

 :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:

 The bourgeoisie has a leg over the proletariat
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: McNorris on September 07, 2005, 01:05:57 PM
"Ten dollar fooky, five dollar sucky, three dollar wanky. Me love you long time!"

This would be considered a racist joke in many circles... Including mine.

Another enlightened leftist displays shining humanity.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on September 09, 2005, 02:09:44 PM
Quote

McNorris wrote:
"Ten dollar fooky, five dollar sucky, three dollar wanky. Me love you long time!"

This would be considered a racist joke in many circles... Including mine.

Another enlightened leftist displays shining humanity.


You were not around these parts when the comment I made would make sense to you.  Cyberus was, hence his chuckle.

No racism involved whatsoever if you understand the joke.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: adolescent on September 18, 2005, 10:54:52 AM
Quote

mdma wrote:
You were not around these parts when the comment I made would make sense to you.  Cyberus was, hence his chuckle.

No racism involved whatsoever if you understand the joke.


Joke or not, it's racist.  Just because you find it funny doesn't mean it's not offensive.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on September 18, 2005, 12:48:43 PM
Quote

adolescent wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
You were not around these parts when the comment I made would make sense to you.  Cyberus was, hence his chuckle.

No racism involved whatsoever if you understand the joke.


Joke or not, it's racist.  Just because you find it funny doesn't mean it's not offensive.
HAH!
As if you care!
Nice words, but I think if you were an employer you would prefer a white employee rather than a black, because 'you understand the white one better'.
Africa is poor because they're lazy over there, innit? YOUR WORDS!
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on September 19, 2005, 10:54:15 AM
Quote

adolescent wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
You were not around these parts when the comment I made would make sense to you.  Cyberus was, hence his chuckle.

No racism involved whatsoever if you understand the joke.


Joke or not, it's racist.  Just because you find it funny doesn't mean it's not offensive.


Please explain to me why paraphrasing a famous american war film in the context of referring to a comment about iamaboringperson having a nice wank that was made 2 years ago is racist.

Just because you are not the sharpest tool in the box doesn't mean everybody else is the same as you.
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: adz on September 19, 2005, 12:25:34 PM
Overt Extremist Political Correctness strikes again... :roll:


Has a nice ring to it that does :lol:
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: adolescent on September 19, 2005, 06:23:30 PM
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Quote

adolescent wrote:

Joke or not, it's racist.  Just because you find it funny doesn't mean it's not offensive.
HAH!
As if you care!
Nice words, but I think if you were an employer you would prefer a white employee rather than a black, because 'you understand the white one better'.
Africa is poor because they're lazy over there, innit? YOUR WORDS!


My words?  Care to quote?  I think you've mistaken me for someone else.

And yes, I do care.  It's racially offensive and doesn't belong here.  I'm not saying the people that said it are racist, but the joke is a racist stereotype.  
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on September 19, 2005, 06:47:39 PM
Quote

adolescent wrote:
My words?  Care to quote?  I think you've mistaken me for someone else.
Sorry, I indeed confused you with Angrybit. My apologies
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: T_Bone on September 21, 2005, 07:17:01 PM
What do they need a supermarket for? Don't they normally just queue up for cheese?  :-D
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on September 21, 2005, 07:23:15 PM
Quote

T_Bone wrote:
What do they need a supermarket for? Don't they normally just queue up for cheese?  :-D
No, for pigheads or things like that. Cheese is a luxurious product.

-edit- Good to see you back, T-Bone :-)
Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: T_Bone on September 21, 2005, 10:18:23 PM
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Quote

T_Bone wrote:
What do they need a supermarket for? Don't they normally just queue up for cheese?  :-D
No, for pigheads or things like that. Cheese is a luxurious product.

-edit- Good to see you back, T-Bone :-)


The pighead is _essential_ for a proper pig barbeque!!
I've never had socialist pig though :-P

(thanks!)

Title: Re: If socialists ran a supermarket
Post by: on September 22, 2005, 12:19:28 PM
Quote

T_Bone wrote:
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Quote

T_Bone wrote:
What do they need a supermarket for? Don't they normally just queue up for cheese?  :-D
No, for pigheads or things like that. Cheese is a luxurious product.

-edit- Good to see you back, T-Bone :-)


The pighead is _essential_ for a proper pig barbeque!!
I've never had socialist pig though :-P

(thanks!)



I've often eaten capitalist pig at barbeque's! ;-)