Amiga.org
Coffee House => Coffee House Boards => CH / Entertainment => Topic started by: glockspeel on June 13, 2005, 11:18:19 PM
-
BBC News - Jackson Cleared of Abuse (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/4604027.stm)
:-o
-
I'm sure plenty of people will call the verdict into question and an equal number will counter argue. Either way, the guy's pretty badly damaged.
I wonder if we'll ever know the absolute truth of the entire situation - if you ask me, the parents of these kids willingly exposed their children to risk, considering previous allegations).
-
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.
-
PMC wrote:
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.
You're talking Nonce Sense!
-
bloodline wrote:
PMC wrote:
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.
You're talking Nonce Sense!
Hey Yo!
The first time this was brought to court, i had my doubts. But after the 20-odd time, i am not so convinced.
Regards,
-
Michael Jackson, not guilty by reason of celebrity.
Nothing else needs be said.
-
@Wayne
Aye aye, I'm inclined to agree here.
It does raise an interesting question though. Do we, in general I mean, prejudge celebrities whenever they are accused of anything?
-
Do we, in general I mean, prejudge celebrities whenever they are accused of anything?
People "pre-judge" everything, including me and this Web site, not just celebrities. The media doesn't help.
-
Wayne wrote:
Michael Jackson, not guilty by reason of celebrity.
Nothing else needs be said.
Celebrity paedo's always get away with it.
-
People "pre-judge" everything, including me and this Web site, not just celebrities. The media doesn't help.
I think that makes you a celebritiy as well, sort of. :-)
-
PMC wrote:
Just because the guy is decidedly odd doesn't mean he's a paedophile.
Sleeping with children is not "decidedly odd", it's perverted.
-
got an email from a friend in LA:
----
seen this morning on the LA Daily newspaper (particularly for the double-entendre)- all caps, big and bold:
"HE BEAT IT"
----
:roflmao:
-
Sleeping with children is not "decidedly odd", it's perverted
Only if he was doing it for sexual gratification.
-
Turambar wrote:
Sleeping with children is not "decidedly odd", it's perverted
Only if he was doing it for sexual gratification.
No.
Sleeping with a child that isn't your own is perverted full stop.
There is *no* need for it.
-
In that case i better make sure i dont sleep in the same bed as any blokes because then ill be a homosexual?
Are you seeing the flaw in your logic here? Whether there was a need for it or not and whether you agree with it or not does not make the man a pervert.
-
Turambar wrote:
In that case i better make sure i dont sleep in the same bed as any blokes because then ill be a homosexual?
Are you seeing the flaw in your logic here? Whether there was a need for it or not and whether you agree with it or not does not make the man a pervert.
We have different interpretations of perversion then.
-
In that case i better make sure i dont sleep in the same bed as any blokes because then ill be a homosexual?
who cares? if you are adults i don't care a rats behind what may or may not be going on.
i'm not a prude (where's that whale penis???) :-P
but in MJ's case we are talking about children. and children is where I draw the line. it doesn't matter if he's really "doing" anything with these kids. you just don't put children in a strangers bed.
period.
-
Prepare for Paedogeddon!!! (http://www.glgarden.org/foreverman/brasseye.html)
"But today, the number of children having sex with adults is beyond belief. If you define a child as anyone under 30, the figure is over 86%. Institutional paedophilia spreads wide rife."
-
who cares?
My point exactly.
-
In a new development, Michael Jackson was contacted by a member of the British Press and was asked how he felt about being acquitted of all charges:
"Chamone motherf****r! Ah'm f***ing innocent of all those motherf*****g charges!"
-
Wayne wrote:
Michael Jackson, not guilty by reason of celebrity. Nothing else needs be said.
Not quite true: the actual evidence was paper thin and suggested rather than proved. The members of the jury were quite aware of the difference; no mean feat in a country which in a remote location on Cuba seeks to do exactly the opposite! I am quite sure that Jackson did things which were revolting as well as highly illegal, but unfortunately for all the children who didn't press charges, the witnesses who did were not exactly stellar. That is vastly unfair and morally inexcusable, but laws and trials were never about fairness or justice. They are about, well, laws.
In any case, the participants in this muppet show have emerged badly scarred. Jackson will never be able to hold another party for children at his home, unless he is separated from them with barbed wire and kept under continuous camera surveillance. His image, already tarnished, has sunk pretty much to rock bottom after this mediashark feeding frenzy. And perhaps it makes parents in general wonder just a little bit more about taking sensible precautions before handing over your child to someone you don't really know. Even if it is a celebrity.
-
@Cymric,
Several of the jurors themselves when interviewed said that "I'm fairly certain that he has done some of the things for which he was accused, but the prosecution simply didn't make their case beyond a shadow of doubt in this instance."
So, blame it on the bleepy prosecution, or more accurately, you can blame it on the fact that Jackson could buy the best defense attorneys which are usually far better than the local District Attorney in almost every case.
An average or poor person would have been lynched on the same exact prosecution case within a week of the start of the trial.
Hence, not guilty by reason of celebrity.
Wayne
-
You penned down a non-sequitur. Prosecution was bleepy, but that does not mean an unfavourable ruling is caused the salary of the defense lawyers. There are more causes. If you put lousy witnesses on the stand---and that was something the Dutch papers strongly suggested---you can expect them to be gunned down by any lawyer, no matter how many zeroes there are on his pay cheque. A trial is not a game where you ask the other party to go easy on your witnesses just because you are not so good a lawyer, or the witness simply stinks!
In addition, your argument is very subjective: there are plenty of examples where the salary of the lawyer did not do a thing because the evidence was so overwhelming. I am quite sure you wouldn't have mentioned it were Jackson found to be guilty. But you will remember the sentiment that the jury verdict was solely caused by big money and big star status.
I really feel very sorry for the children who did not see justice served, but as I said before, laws and trials are not about justice. This concludes my contributions to this discussion. I have made my point clear and see little reason to continue elaborating it.
-
I really feel very sorry for the children who did not see justice served
As do I, I think that's the source of my frustration over this issue. There is simply the indication that even the jurors think he's a pedo, but that the prosecution simply failed to prove it's case. As a lawyer friend points out though, the prosecution's job to make the case is only half the equation. The other being the strength of the defense's "ripping apart" of the prosecution's case.
I tend to wonder whether a lot of the witnesses were simply intimidated by the whole process and scope of the trial.
In the end, regardless of what happened, I can only hope that no parent is stupid enough to endanger their kids with this wacko any more.
On top of that, I understand MJ's about 300 million in debt (before the trial even started) and will more than likely now start suing everyone trying to scoop his way out of the hole.
-
PMC wrote:
In a new development, Michael Jackson was contacted by a member of the British Press and was asked how he felt about being acquitted of all charges:
"Chamone motherf****r! Ah'm f***ing innocent of all those motherf*****g charges!"
:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:
"I wanna see the llamay's. Show me the motherf*cking llamay's!" ;-)
-
Without all the evidence in front of me I judge no one. Here in the U.K. we have seen rock solid convictions blown apart years later, with the real guilty parties often walking free.
The question is the same the world over:
IS THE SYSTEM WORKING?
:pint:
-
> IS THE SYSTEM WORKING?
Only for the rich. The system doesn't work for the average person accused of a crime, whether or not they're even involved.
-
Wayne wrote:
> IS THE SYSTEM WORKING?
Only for the rich. The system doesn't work for the average person accused of a crime, whether or not they're even involved.
Damn right. I still object to being a "subject" to the crown. Monarchy sucks.
Still, some people in the world don't even get to express an opinion as to do so could bring hardship or death. That sucks even more.
-
Hey Yo!
:lol:
Michael Jackson - NOT GUILTY! (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5589925505&fromMakeTrack=true)
Regards,
-
Hey Yo!
While the toast is funny (thank you), "Hey Yo!" is about as annoying as Michael Jackson, Doommaster, or people who end every sentence in "ya know?". Please find another catch phrase.
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
Hey Yo!
While the toast is funny (thank you), "Hey Yo!" is about as annoying as Michael Jackson, Doommaster, or people who end every sentence in "ya know?". Please find another catch phrase.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
Glad you liked the link Wayne. Unfortuantely, the "Hey Yo!" mtto will not be dropped for the time being (at least until i think up a new motto to chuck around). But the advantage of this is that everytime i use "Hey Yo!", people will know who i am. ie: i was talking to x56h34 the other day, and when i said "Hey Yo!" to him (without saying my name, or him knowing my email address) he literally latched onto who i was. Ask the guy yourself - it's fool proof! :-D
Regards,
-
That's fine. I'll just write a filter for Amiga.org that edits out "hey yo!" from every single post you've ever made. Short of that, I can simply stop you from posting altogether.
Your choice sir.
-
Wayne wrote:
That's fine. I'll just write a filter for Amiga.org that edits out "hey yo!" from every single post you've ever made. Short of that, I can simply stop you from posting altogether.
Your choice sir.
Hey Yo!
Well, i am not really in a position to argue (as i am off computer in a minute), but i can get past that filtering thing! ;-) On the other hand, you cannot be serious in banning me just because of The Great "Hey Yo!" catchphrase! :-) I am sure we can solve this like muture adults and find a way past this.
Regards,
-
Wayne wrote:
That's fine. I'll just write a filter for Amiga.org that edits out "hey yo!" from every single post you've ever made. Short of that, I can simply stop you from posting altogether.
Your choice sir.
Surely a filter that replaces all occurances of "Hey Yo!" with, "I like anal sex with small furry animals" would be far more amusing for the rest of us? ;-)
-
mdma wrote:
Wayne wrote:
That's fine. I'll just write a filter for Amiga.org that edits out "hey yo!" from every single post you've ever made. Short of that, I can simply stop you from posting altogether.
Your choice sir.
Surely a filter that replaces all occurances of "Hey Yo!" with, "I like anal sex with small furry animals" would be far more amusing for the rest of us? ;-)
Hey Yo!
No! No! No! That cannot happen. Really, i don't see any different in me saying "Hey Yo!" to MAD saying "Hoya!"?! :-?
Regards,
-
You can do it if you want. I just have a few people that find it annoying, including myself.
There are several ways I'll take care of it;
1) (and this is my personal favorite) substitute any variation of "hey yo" with "I like anal sex with small furry animals"
2) delete the first line of any post you've ever made.
3) Beg you to occassionally use something besides "hey yo!". It's not the use of "hey yo!" that is annoying. It's the use of "hey yo!" with every single post, image entry, or everything else you do.
Stereotypical as it may seem "hey yo!" forces a false perception in that at this point, I can't help but see you as a tiny white guy with a speech impediment, smoking dope while wearing big baggy pants down around your ankle and your oversized ball cap sideways listening to Rap music.
Having seen your picture, I know this isn't true but this forced perception makes you seem far less intelligent than you actually are.
Wayne
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Unfortuantely, the "Hey Yo!" mtto will not be dropped for the time being (at least until i think up a new motto to chuck around). But the advantage of this is that everytime i use "Hey Yo!", people will know who i am.
so, it identifies you as the idiot you are? :-)
-
Wayne wrote:
You can do it if you want. I just have a few people that find it annoying, including myself.
There are several ways I'll take care of it;
1) (and this is my personal favorite) substitute any variation of "hey yo" with "I like anal sex with small furry animals"
:-)
Let's have a vote!
1) substitute any variation of "hey yo" with "I like anal sex with small furry animals."
2) substitute any variation of "hey yo" with "I like anal sex with small furry animals, especially just after breakfast, sometimes even during."
3) substitute any variation of "hey yo" with "I like anal sex with small furry animals, whilst perusing the lingerie section in Woolworths."
4) A random choice of 1,2, or 3 each time "Hey Yo!" is typed in a thread.
I vote for option 4. :-)
-
voting for 4 also.
maybe we can have a thing where anyone can add a line that fits that can be added to the random sample.
for example:
"I like anal sex with small furry animals, except that i have no dick."
-
cecilia wrote:
voting for 4 also.
maybe we can have a thing where anyone can add a line that fits that can be added to the random sample.
for example:
"I like anal sex with small furry animals, except that i have no dick."
...so I insert them in my rectal cavity.
-
Wayne wrote:
You can do it if you want. I just have a few people that find it annoying, including myself.
There are several ways I'll take care of it;
1) (and this is my personal favorite) substitute any variation of "hey yo" with "I like anal sex with small furry animals"
2) delete the first line of any post you've ever made.
3) Beg you to occassionally use something besides "hey yo!". It's not the use of "hey yo!" that is annoying. It's the use of "hey yo!" with every single post, image entry, or everything else you do.
Stereotypical as it may seem "hey yo!" forces a false perception in that at this point, I can't help but see you as a tiny white guy with a speech impediment, smoking dope while wearing big baggy pants down around your ankle and your oversized ball cap sideways listening to Rap music.
Having seen your picture, I know this isn't true but this forced perception makes you seem far less intelligent than you actually are.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
Well most of what you said was correct, apart from the baseball cap and the rap music part! :-) I would like to see this system get under way. I think after the novelty has worn off, i will change to a different catchphrase (maybe via vote).
Regards,
-
I like having anal sex with small furry animals!
Well most of what you said was correct, apart from the baseball cap and the rap music part! :-) I would like to see this system get under way. I think after the novelty has worn off, i will change to a different catchphrase (maybe via vote).
Regards,
If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! ;-)
-
Hey Yo!
You can't do this to me! :-x
Regards,
-EDIT-
Aha! Wayne messed up! :-) Instead of using a filtering system, he just done it manually! So i just edited back my original post! Another one for the good guy! :hammer:
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
I like having anal sex with small furry animals!
You can't do this to me! :-x
Regards,
-EDIT-
Aha! Wayne messed up! :-) Instead of using a filtering system, he just done it manually! So i just edited back my original post! Another one for the good guy! :hammer:
Yes he can :-)
-
Re-editing moderated posts is a violation of the terms of service. Be careful matey.
-
Wayne wrote:
Re-editing moderated posts is a violation of the terms of service. Be careful matey.
Hey Yo!
Come on Wayne, this ain't fair! They were my posts in the first place, and you have no right to edit them (and insulting me at the same time). I have every right to edit allegations that are false. So there. Please just bypass this Wayne, surely you can ignore this.
Regards,
-
I have politely asked you to stop saying "Hey Yo!", citing the annoyance factor and pointing out that it makes you look like an uneducated idiot. Others have expressed their annoyance with "Hey yo!" and "The great" verbally. All we're asking is that you stop starting every single post with the same annoying catch phrase. Not a difficult thing.
After all, as I said, you and everyone else would find it just as annoying if I were to call myself "The Great Wayne Hunt" and start every sentence with "Hey Yo!".
"Fair"? No. Just a humble request that has consequences.
{edit : and oh yeah, "Hey Yo!", I'm not insulting you. You're doing that all by yourself.}
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
I have politely asked you to stop saying "Hey Yo!", citing the annoyance factor and pointing out that it makes you look like an uneducated idiot. Others have expressed their annoyance with "Hey yo!" and "The great" verbally. All we're asking is that you stop starting every single post with the same annoying catch phrase. Not a difficult thing.
After all, as I said, you and everyone else would find it just as annoying if I were to call myself "The Great Wayne Hunt" and start every sentence with "Hey Yo!".
"Fair"? No. Just a humble request that has consequences.
{edit : and oh yeah, "Hey Yo!", I'm not insulting you. You're doing that all by yourself.}
Wayne
Hey Yo!
Jesus Christ Wayne! It's just a damned catchphrase. I have had it upto here with you Wayne (hand hovering 1 foot above my head). I can't believe you have so much spare time as to childishly cycle through all my posts and replace The Great "Hey Yo!" catchphrase, with the insultsing "i like anal sex with small fluffy animals" or whatever. Someone needs to calm down a bit if you ask me.
Regards,
-
For the record, I'm perfectly calm. I'm just having fun with this now, as you must be as well. We asked you to stop, we informed you of what would happen, and you continued. I have no pity or empathy here, although my amusement level is fairly high at this point. :-D
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
For the record, I'm perfectly calm. I'm just having fun with this now, as you must be as well. We asked you to stop, we informed you of what would happen, and you continued. I have no pity or empathy here, although my amusement level is fairly high at this point. :-D
Wayne
Hey Yo!
-EDITED-
Wayne, please stop with the editing.
Regards,
-
I digress. Go ahead and change them back. I've made my point. If you refuse to honor the request, that's up to you. It just proves that maybe the perception you're trying to force on us of "uneducated idiot" perhaps isn't that far off the mark. I just find it interesting to see that you and Sumner are indeed two different (if not inseperable) people.
Wayne
-
i can't have my reputation level dropping.
What reputation? So far the only impression you've given us is that you're an annoying plebe. One that can make intelligent posts, except for the annoying factor of starting every sentence with "Hey yo!" If you were my friend and did that in real life, I'd have decked you by now.
-
Getting back on topic, I will say that I have found this little spat far more entertaining than Michael getting away with molesting children..
-
Wayne wrote:
I digress. Go ahead and change them back. I've made my point. If you refuse to honor the request, that's up to you. It just proves that maybe the perception you're trying to force on us of "uneducated idiot" perhaps isn't that far off the mark. I just find it interesting to see that you and Sumner are indeed two different (if not inseperable) people.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
That's {bleep}! I am predicted good grades at college, and am planning on computer/office type of work.
Regards,
-
Wayne wrote:
i can't have my reputation level dropping.
What reputation? So far the only impression you've given us is that you're an annoying plebe. One that can make intelligent posts, except for the annoying factor of starting every sentence with "Hey yo!" If you were my friend and did that in real life, I'd have decked you by now.
Hey Yo!
Decked me?! :lol: What type of person are you Wayne? I am not here for a punch-up! :crazy:
Regards,
-
Wow. You're a school kid. That certainly explains a lot.
-
I have very little tolerance for being intentionally annoyed, which is what you're now doing. Therefore, if you were a friend of mine, I would have already asked you to stop. When you chose to ignore me, I would have simply flattened you. You can't tell me that if you annoyed your buddies like Sumner this much, he wouldn't deck you as well.
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
Wow. You're a school kid. That certainly explains a lot.
Hey Yo!
Not really a school kid, i am 20. Although i believe the schooling between the UK and USA are different, so it probably could be to you.
Regards,
-
Wayne wrote:
I have very little tolerance for being intentionally annoyed, which is what you're now doing. Therefore, if you were a friend of mine, I would have already asked you to stop. When you chose to ignore me, I would have simply flattened you. You can't tell me that if you annoyed your buddies like Sumner this much, he wouldn't deck you as well.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
I believe i haven't annoyed you, Wayne. For whatever reason, you have ALWAYS had a grudge against me of some sort for some reason. I admit, i have annoyed a few of my friends before (and vice versa) via joking around and that, but (unlike you) we can control ourselves from using our fists for whatever reason. Incidently, not that i am a violent person in real life anyway, if i did get some nutcase such as yourself Wayne even try and deck me, i would defend myself and fight back. I doubt you would deck me anyway Wayne, i am more healthy and athletic than you - that is judging by the pictures of course though. It is you also that is being annoying, Wayne, it is always you that starts me off into on of your "trademark" arguements.
Regards,
-
For whatever reason, you have ALWAYS had a grudge against me of some sort for some reason
Wow, and people call me paranoid??
I'm not in any way threatening you sir. I'm simply pointing out that I find you excessively annoying, as I found Sumner and a few of your other clique friends. The only difference is, unlike them, you haven't given me a reason to ban you yet. Keep trying though, you'll get there. :-D
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
For whatever reason, you have ALWAYS had a grudge against me of some sort for some reason
Wow, and people call me paranoid??
I'm not in any way threatening you sir. I'm simply pointing out that I find you excessively annoying, as I found Sumner and a few of your other clique friends. The only difference is, unlike them, you haven't given me a reason to ban you yet. Keep trying though, you'll get there. :-D
Wayne
Hey Yo!
What do you mean "keep trying, you'll get there."? What the bloody hell have i dont to get a banning (apart from editing my own posts by some lunatic who has a sick mind)
Regards,
-EDIT-
This thread is out of hand now. This is my last post in this thread.
-
Well sure, now that you've gotten your foul-mouthed boyfriend sumner involved. :)
-
Wayne wrote:
Well sure, now that you've gotten your foul-mouthed boyfriend sumner involved. :)
*last post in thread*
Hey Yo!
What Sumner7 does is no business i've mine, Wayne. Infact, i dsidn't recommend him actually coming back here to defend me (especially at that tone of voice).
Regards,
-
At this point CU, I'm beyond speech at all of this, except to say that I've found it most amusing.
The script is almost complete which will automatically select every post you've ever made and substitute the appropriate text with a randomly true sentiment. No amount of re-editing by you will stop it as it'll run about once every 3 minutes. The "merely adequate CU_Amiga" will fail and I will be victorious!
Bwahahahaha!
:laughing:
-
Wayne wrote:
At this point CU, I'm beyond speech at all of this, except to say that I've found it most amusing.
The script is almost complete which will automatically select every post you've ever made and substitute the appropriate text with a randomly true sentiment. No amount of re-editing by you will stop it. The "merely adequate CU_Amiga" will fail and I will be victorious!
Bwahahahaha!
:laughing:
*very last post in this thread*
Hey Yo!
No you bloody wont win this little battle Wayne. Why don't you through in the damned towel. I have the brains to outwit you and that script. Bring it on! I say, i will be up all night, thinking a way around this and editing ALL my posts. I can't believe you are typing up a damned script just to bloody stop me from using The Great "Hey Yo!" catchphrase. You cannot do this to The Great CU_AMiGA.
Regards,
-
Nothing difficult there.
1) Select all posts by CU_Amiga
2) Substitute "Hey_Yo!" for "I blow goats" or other random truism.
If you alter the spelling or placement of it, I simply adjust the code which can change about 1000 posts per second. You won't win...
:laughing:
-
Wayne wrote:
Nothing difficult there.
1) Select all posts by CU_Amiga
2) Substitute "Hey_Yo!" for "I blow goats" or other random truism.
If you alter the spelling or placement of it, I simply adjust the code which can change about 1000 posts per second. You won't win...
:laughing:
Hey Yo!
YOU'RE ENJOYING THIS WAYNE! :-x :pissed: PERVERT! SICKO!
Regards,
-
You're damned right I'm enjoying this... :-D Stop it... You're starting to sound like your boyfriend!
I can't stand laughing this hard... Thanks!
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
You're damned right I'm enjoying this... :-D Stop it... You're starting to sound like your boyfriend!
I can't stand laughing this hard... Thanks!
Wayne
Hey Yo!
I can never forgive you for this, Wayne. I dont want this to sound like a threat, but someone who does this to me will PAY! :pissed:
Regards,
-
What exactly have I done to you sir, other than to have a great deal of fun with the situation that YOU, the "great CU_Amiga" created?
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
You're damned right I'm enjoying this... :-D Stop it... You're starting to sound like your boyfriend!
I can't stand laughing this hard... Thanks!
Wayne
I like having anal sex with small furry animals!
I can never forgive you for this, Wayne. I dont want this to sound like a threat, but someone who does this to me will PAY! :pissed:
Regards,
That's not very Christian... the anal sex or the lack of forgiveness :-D
-
@bloodline
ROFL... HAHAHAHA! Thanks! I knew I wasn't the only one enjoying this!
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
If you alter the spelling or placement of it, I simply adjust the code which can change about 1000 posts per second. You won't win...
:laughing:
SELECT * FROM posts_table_name WHERE user_id_field=7780 && body_text_field REGEXP "^.*Hey\s*Yo.*$"
(obviously the fields should be correctly named)
This should pull out just those posts by CU that contain the text from the database in the first place. That should accelerate the script.
-
bloodline wrote:
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
You're damned right I'm enjoying this... :-D Stop it... You're starting to sound like your boyfriend!
I can't stand laughing this hard... Thanks!
Wayne
I like having anal sex with small furry animals!
I can never forgive you for this, Wayne. I dont want this to sound like a threat, but someone who does this to me will PAY! :pissed:
Regards,
That's not very Christian... the anal sex or the lack of forgiveness :-D
Hey Yo!
BLOODHOUND! Don't you bleeting well start as well. I have just about had enough of Wayne - i have now had it up to here with Wayne infact (hand now 2 feet above me head), and i don't need no disobedient dog to make matters worse.
Regards,
-
Wayne wrote:
What exactly have I done to you sir, other than to have a great deal of fun with the situation that YOU, the "great CU_Amiga" created?
Hey Yo!
This is all you bloody fault Wayne. You and you big typing mouth. If i go down, i am bringing you down with me! GRRRR!
Regards,
-
Wayne wrote:
@bloodline
ROFL... HAHAHAHA! Thanks! I knew I wasn't the only one enjoying this!
Wayne
It's like a spectator sport :-)
-
> This is all you bloody fault Wayne. You and you big typing
> mouth. If i go down,
Wait a minute... I don't remember ever asking CU_Amiga to "go down" on anything! Anyone else ask CU_Amiga to "go down"? I think he gets enough of that from the goats...
:laughing:
-
Wayne wrote:
I think he gets enough of that from the goats...
:laughing:
Must... resist... photoshop...
-
hahahahahaha....
:laughing:
-
So CU_Amiga, you are the famous Goat Sucker!
BEWARE THE M.I.B. !!!
They are looking for YOU!
:inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: GOATSUCKER CAPTURED (http://paranormal.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fuforeview.tripod.com%2Fuforeview%2Fchupacabra.html)
:inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive:
-
Tripitaka wrote:
So CU_Amiga, you are the famous Goat Sucker!
BEWARE THE M.I.B. !!!
They are looking for YOU!
:inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: GOATSUCKER CAPTURED (http://paranormal.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fuforeview.tripod.com%2Fuforeview%2Fchupacabra.html)
:inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive: :inquisitive:
Hey Yo!
Who the {bleep} are you now? Where the bloody hell did you pop up from?
Regards,
-
FWA HA HA..........I've been watching you .....you may have stolen Friday but there is still time between Thursday and Saturday.... yes.. mm..time enough we thinks...mmm....
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Baah! Make mine a stiff one, taxidermist style!
Who the {bleep} are you now? Where the bloody hell did you pop up from?
Regards,
People are asking the same thing of you ;-)
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
I digress. Go ahead and change them back. I've made my point. If you refuse to honor the request, that's up to you. It just proves that maybe the perception you're trying to force on us of "uneducated idiot" perhaps isn't that far off the mark. I just find it interesting to see that you and Sumner are indeed two different (if not inseperable) people.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
That's {bleep}! I am predicted good grades at college, and am planning on computer/office type of work.
Regards,
What are you still doing at college at 20? :-?
You should have left at 17/18.
-
Wayne wrote:
@bloodline
ROFL... HAHAHAHA! Thanks! I knew I wasn't the only one enjoying this!
Wayne
You are certainly not alone Wayne. :-)
-
the next time any of you fellas start talking about how only women have PMS, i'll direct you to this thread (and all other threads that have been created by this silly silly boy).
just a little FYI
:-P
-
cecilia wrote:
the next time any of you fellas start talking about how only women have PMS, i'll direct you to this thread (and all other threads that have been created by this silly silly boy).
just a little FYI
:-P
PMS/PMT is a temporal affiliction once per month, CU's affliction is permanent. :-)
-
@mdma:
I believe the medical term for it is C.U.MS. :-)
EDIT:
Profanity slightly masked.
-
C'mon guys. I know I've had a bit of fun this morning, but we're stepping on the lines of good taste with the latest comments here folks.
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
C'mon guys. I know I've had a bit of fun this morning, but we're stepping on the lines of good taste with the latest comments here folks.
Wayne
So anal sex with small furry animals is ok, but PMS isn't? ;-)
-
@Wayne:
Yes, you are right. :-)
I just don't know when to stop. :oops:
-
I clearly said that I was involved, meaning I'm just as guilty as the rest... All I'm asking now is that we reel in the language before it gets a little too far gone.
BTW, it wasn't "PMS" that I was objecting to.
Wayne
-
@Wayne
I know, was just teasing. :-)
-
mdma wrote:
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
I digress. Go ahead and change them back. I've made my point. If you refuse to honor the request, that's up to you. It just proves that maybe the perception you're trying to force on us of "uneducated idiot" perhaps isn't that far off the mark. I just find it interesting to see that you and Sumner are indeed two different (if not inseperable) people.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
That's {bleep}! I am predicted good grades at college, and am planning on computer/office type of work.
Regards,
What are you still doing at college at 20? :-?
You should have left at 17/18.
Hey Yo!
Don't worry this is my last year at college (well, now finished actually). But you do get older students at colleges and Universities now.
Regards,
-
cecilia wrote:
the next time any of you fellas start talking about how only women have PMS, i'll direct you to this thread (and all other threads that have been created by this silly silly boy).
just a little FYI
:-P
Hey Yo!
...and what are your opinions of Wayne then, cecil? As he himself said he had much to blame as i have for this thread! ;-)
Regards,
-
..and what are your opinions of Wayne then, cecil? As he himself said he had much to blame as i have for this thread!
Their opinions are their opinions and I don't think you're going to like it if they're honest, but I do agree with others here.
You REALLY need to stop crapflooding Amiga.org. No one gives a flying {bleep} about "the great CU_Amiga" except you and your little group of friends (all of whom have been banned for being annoying and crapflooding as well).
On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
[On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.
Hey Yo!
My pleasure! :-D I too have similar opinions about you too Wayne (about your current situation/dilema), but i dare not blurt them out here, as the relationship between us is already strained enough.
Regards,
-
Say "Hey Yo!" one more {edited by moderator} time. I dare you.
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
[On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.
Hey Yo!
My pleasure! :-D I too have similar opinions about you too Wayne (about your current situation/dilema), but i dare not blurt them out here, as the relationship between us is already strained enough.
Regards,
Then why not have an open and frank discussion via pmail?
That way we can all be spared the embarrassment of seeing this on a public forum.
-
That way we can all be spared the embarrassment of seeing this on a public forum.
I dunno, it did give me a good laugh :-)
-
PMC wrote:
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
[On the other hand, I think we all thank you for giving us yourself to laugh at for the last two days.
Hey Yo!
My pleasure! :-D I too have similar opinions about you too Wayne (about your current situation/dilema), but i dare not blurt them out here, as the relationship between us is already strained enough.
Regards,
Then why not have an open and frank discussion via pmail?
That way we can all be spared the embarrassment of seeing this on a public forum.
Hey Yo!
It was Wayne as well PMC, so i hope that's aimed at him too.
Regards,
-
Then why not have an open and frank discussion via pmail?
I'm sorry for the embarrassment, but in this situation it's best to show this in an open fashion. He would just post any pmails he didn't like in public, or make wild claims of things that never happened.
The more he bleets on, the more I think he's really begging me to ban him so that he can finally be equal to his peers.
Wayne
-
Wayne wrote:
The more he bleets on, the more I think he's really begging me to ban him so that he can finally be equal to his peers.
I think he's more likely begging to feed the amiga.org kitty.
Know worra' mean, eh?
-
It just seems a right old fuss to make about a sig, but I agree that CU hasn't helped himself by adding more and more fuel to the fire.
-
Sorry guys. I've pretty much had it with the crapflooding here. I've asked him to stop and he continues.
I've temporarily suspended at least three different IP numbers that he is using to continue the "takeover of Amiga.org". Hopefully he'll take the hint and we can allow him back once he chills out a bit.
I know it's been funny, and I've laughed my ass off as well, but enough is enough. Let's get back to talking about something besides the simply mediocre CU_Amiga please.
Wayne
-
Drat, there goes my next 5 photoshop projects :lol:
-
CU_AMiGA wrote:
mdma wrote:
CU_AMiGA wrote:
Wayne wrote:
I digress. Go ahead and change them back. I've made my point. If you refuse to honor the request, that's up to you. It just proves that maybe the perception you're trying to force on us of "uneducated idiot" perhaps isn't that far off the mark. I just find it interesting to see that you and Sumner are indeed two different (if not inseperable) people.
Wayne
Hey Yo!
That's {bleep}! I am predicted good grades at college, and am planning on computer/office type of work.
Regards,
What are you still doing at college at 20? :-?
You should have left at 17/18.
Hey Yo!
Don't worry this is my last year at college (well, now finished actually). But you do get older students at colleges and Universities now.
Regards,
Universities aye, I'm one (Or, I was until a few weeks ago), but college? The only people I teach at college that are over 18 are the "special" ones. ;-)
-
Wayne wrote:
I know it's been funny, and I've laughed my ass off as well, but enough is enough. Let's get back to talking about something besides the simply mediocre CU_Amiga please.
Wayne
Breasts.
-
I like those a bit pointy.
-
odin wrote:
I like those a bit pointy.
Mmmmmmm.....
-
PMC wrote:
Wayne wrote:
I know it's been funny, and I've laughed my ass off as well, but enough is enough. Let's get back to talking about something besides the simply mediocre CU_Amiga please.
Wayne
Breasts.
Sorry? Did you say beasts? Of limited stature and somewhat hirsute? Who have a penchant for... err... buggery?
-
Ok, since the fun is over and the topic is astray (my fault), I'm going to go ahead and lock this one.
Wayne
-
odin wrote:
I like those a bit pointy.
"a bit"?