Amiga.org

The "Not Quite Amiga but still computer related category" => Alternative Operating Systems => Topic started by: blobrana on March 28, 2005, 03:23:20 PM

Title: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on March 28, 2005, 03:23:20 PM
hum,
i know that a few of u out there use Firefox v1.x (http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-aviary1.0.1/firefox-1.0.2.en-US.win32.installer.exe)....

Here are two tweaks that will turbo boost your surfing (just been released: but tested by me and they work)

1) For those with a brain try this link (http://www.ipkonfig.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=165&Itemid=29)...

or this onepage (save page as) version from yours truly (http://www.geocities.com/amigarana/firefox.htm)

look for the bit where it says `FireFox on Steriods banned from Olympics`...




2) For the `beginners` (and not as powerful) try FireTune 0.6 (http://www.totalidea.com/freestuff4.htm) it`ll preform an easy and fast optimization of your browser.  
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Acill on March 28, 2005, 03:46:00 PM
Wow, it works great. For you Mac OS X users the same instruction page works for us as well. Its a HUGE speed boost too!!
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Amigaz on March 28, 2005, 03:59:11 PM
Tried it too, very pleased.
Almost a 50% noticeable speedup.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Floid on March 28, 2005, 04:31:21 PM
As a dozen pedants will now note, pipelining may not be the nicest thing to do to 'hefty' forking webservers like Apache. Whether or not IE does it already, and whether or not Netscape let you in the olden days.

Call this a "design flaw in the Internet," but they seem to have kept the default behavior for a reason.

As to tweaking the layout reflow timers and stuff, more power to you with that, I had mixed results the last time I played with it.  :-)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: mindprober on March 29, 2005, 06:18:15 AM
Acill,

Are you using the G5 optimized Fireox also?


Quote

Acill wrote:
Wow, it works great. For you Mac OS X users the same instruction page works for us as well. Its a HUGE speed boost too!!
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: T3000 on March 29, 2005, 06:35:11 AM

---------------------

System Requirements:
This software has been tested on Windows XP only. However - it should also run on Windows 2000 / 2003.

---------------------

Unfortunatly, some of us are still using w98se. :whack:
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: odin on March 29, 2005, 08:05:18 AM
:-o And why would any sane person still inflict that upon his/herself?
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Waccoon on March 29, 2005, 09:55:28 AM
Forget page views.  I'd like to know what they did to the file requester in 0.9 that made it dirt slow!  I have a large folder with hundreds of sub-folders, and when I browse to it with Firefox (0.9, 1.0, 1.0.2), the file requester can take a couple seconds to show the contents of the folder.  In Firefox 0.8, it is instantaneous.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: on March 29, 2005, 11:58:28 AM
Quote

odin wrote:
:-o And why would any sane person still inflict that upon his/herself?


Maybe they are using bochs on an A1200? ;-)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on March 29, 2005, 12:30:10 PM
Quote

T3000 wrote:

---------------------

System Requirements:
This software has been tested on Windows XP only. However - it should also run on Windows 2000 / 2003.

---------------------

Unfortunatly, some of us are still using w98se. :whack:
I didn't even read those system requirements, and yes, I still use w98se and it works fine :-)
Well, the startup of firefox is a lot faster.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Acill on March 29, 2005, 01:54:39 PM
@jdryyz

Yup I am using the G5 version. I just got the last compiled version of
it before I did the hack.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: amigamad on March 29, 2005, 02:43:04 PM
I done the speed up about a month ago i say be careful this is for broadband users only and some pages take longer to load, one of the firefox  developers recomends against doing this tweak because some pages with lots of images are slower to load and it increases the load on the cpu, since doing this i have a number of sites that are slower and some dont display properly it also causes my mediaplayer to pause when playing  mp3 when the page refreshes it was fine before.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on March 29, 2005, 09:21:41 PM
Hum,
Tnx,
Yeah i should have said something along the lines of `not going overboard with the connection numbers`.

With dial up you could use a number like 4 - though experimentation helps.

With broadband you could try a number like 10 - 20 (or higher)...

i personally wouldn’t bother with increased CPU load, (as i run seti with 10-15 applications and it’s always at 100% usage) - but for very slow processors then the hack may not be suitable.

It`s simple case to `undo` though.


@T3000

Forget the software utility, do it by hand.
(see the `steroids` webpage)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: SilvrDrgn on March 29, 2005, 09:43:09 PM
I've heard of this before, and have been running these tweaks for quite some time now in Firefox on my Road Runner cable modem connection.  They work great, and make a very noticeable improvement in speed!
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on March 29, 2005, 09:55:11 PM
Hum,
I suppose you`ll next be telling us that you`ve already added a value of fffffe to the DWord, TcpNumConnections, in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters register,
 To increase your default connections as well?

(assuming you got sp2)


 :-)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: on March 29, 2005, 10:01:58 PM
Quote

blobrana wrote:
Hum,
I suppose you`ll next be telling us that you`ve already added a value of fffffe to the DWord, TcpNumConnections, in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters register,
 To increase your default connections as well?

(assuming you got sp2)


 :-)


How do I find the registry on Debian? ;-)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: The_Editor on March 29, 2005, 10:02:03 PM
Registry ?

/me holds up crucifix..

I cast thee out thy demon of Operating System.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: ottomobiehl on April 02, 2005, 07:32:19 AM
Works great for me! :pint:
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Holley on April 02, 2005, 11:34:17 PM
Gotta say I made this change a while ago, on 750k boradband and set to 10 connections it works fine for messageboards (regardless of photos etc), and hasn't interrupted 2 other machines on the same connection.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on May 12, 2005, 06:53:24 PM
Hope you`ve all updated your browser to version 1.0.4

It`s got a few critical security holes fixed, including all javascript vulnerabilities.
There are currently no known active exploits of these vulnerabilities although a proof of concept has been reported."

See... (http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Martin_Lee on May 12, 2005, 07:14:18 PM
did this a few months ago.

some websites dont like it

ive also done this with Camino
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on September 10, 2005, 08:20:32 PM
Today Firefox has released a patch and a configuration workaround for a Firefox vulnerability which could allow remote code execution.

If you are using Firefox you should type 'about:config:' in the URL box at the top of the Browser.
Now, type 'network.enableIDN' into the second box that appears.
Verify that 'network.enableIDN' is set to 'false'.

Rightclick  to toggle.


This will cure the bug - or wait untill V1.5 is fully released...
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: AmigaHeretic on September 11, 2005, 02:56:54 AM
Speaking of FireFox I think I have found an MS/Google conspiracy.

If you do a search for "firefox" using 'Google Suggest' at http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1&hl=en  it sort of crashes IE.

Hmmm.....

Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: Waccoon on September 11, 2005, 03:30:04 AM
Works fine for me.  Google has a few syntax errors in their pages, though, and they rely on quirks mode for layout.  That's probably what's causing the trouble.  I'd expect more standards-compliance from them.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: SamuraiCrow on September 11, 2005, 08:43:48 PM
What version of Firefox do you have Blobrana?  I have 1.0.6 and the about :config: doesn't bring up anything.  About: by itself brings up a credits screen but nothing about configuration. :-?

-edit-

It's about:config with no second colon.
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on September 11, 2005, 10:41:24 PM
Hum,
yeah,
Tnx, my typo....

No colon or space...

about:config
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: mikeymike on September 11, 2005, 10:50:37 PM
I have tried http pipelining in Firefox before, I never noticed a difference in performance.  The paint delay one is well-known in the community, though I've never tried it myself.

edit: just tried it (ngpaintlayout one), yep, that's quite a difference :-)
Title: Re: For Firefox Sake!
Post by: blobrana on September 11, 2005, 11:28:46 PM
Hum,
so you set it as

nglayout.initialpaint.delay

With a value of 0 rather than 1000?