Amiga.org

Coffee House => Coffee House Boards => CH / General => Topic started by: CU_AMiGA on February 22, 2005, 03:05:59 PM

Title: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 22, 2005, 03:05:59 PM
Hey Yo!

Yeah, i missed you too. I hope you wont mind me taking a little.... SURVEY!!! In public, if you will. I was wondering what people thought the best "failed" computer or console was?

My personal favourite would the Neo Geo AES. Such a fantastic arcade perfect experience in your home. The Neo Geo AES was never going to be commercially popular due to the high priceof not only the system itelf (costing $600), but the games as well (costing $200 each). but thanks a great library of great games, the Neo Geo developed a cult following and outlasted it's 16-Bit rivals (SNES and Genesis) to continue up until the last year.

What is your favourite "failed" computer or console

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 22, 2005, 03:07:49 PM
I guess I may not choose an Amiga, right?
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: bloodline on February 22, 2005, 03:08:24 PM
I'd probably have to go with the Amiga.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 22, 2005, 03:20:43 PM
The Amiga was commercially sucessful (especially in the UK). So that would not be an option. Nice try fellas :-)

Regards,

-EDIT-

By failed consoles i mean:

Panasonic 3DO
Philips CDi
Sharp X68000
Sinclair Quantum Leap
Atari 5200
Atari Lynx
Sega Nomad
GP32
Sam Coupé

....etc - The list goes on!!!

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 22, 2005, 03:26:05 PM
Well, the CDTV wasn't particular succesfull
guess I'll pick that one :-P
but next to that one my fav is I think the CDi, or Atari Jaguar
btw the lynx was quite succesfull wasn't it :-?
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: bloodline on February 22, 2005, 03:42:49 PM
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
The Amiga was commercially sucessful (especially in the UK). So that would not be an option. Nice try fellas :-)

Regards,

-EDIT-

By failed consoles i mean:

Panasonic 3DO
Philips CDi
Sharp X68000
Sinclair Quantum Leap
Atari 5200
Atari Lynx
Sega Nomad
GP32
Sam Coupé

....etc - The list goes on!!!

Regards,


yeah, but they all failed because they were crap... the winners won, because they were good. :-P
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 22, 2005, 04:05:26 PM
Quote

yeah, but they all failed because they were crap... the winners won, because they were good. :-P


OH! Very controversial remark there Mr. Bloodhound. That is not always the case. The GP32 is a very good console, but commercially will never be a success due to financial difficulties with the Gamepark (the company). "Underground" wise, the GP32 is a complete success.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 22, 2005, 04:06:20 PM
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
btw the lynx was quite succesfull wasn't it :-?


It had a few games, but was not a success due to low battery life. It is a damn fine machine though, i have one!
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 22, 2005, 04:08:50 PM
I got one too, plus a few other computers/consoles :-D
but still, despite the known low battery life, I still recall it as being a bit successfull, not quite as the gameboy, but certainly not a failure either...
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 22, 2005, 04:17:44 PM
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
I got one too, plus a few other computers/consoles :-D
but still, despite the known low battery life, I still recall it as being a bit successfull, not quite as the gameboy, but certainly not a failure either...


I think it was. It lasted longer than i thought it did (1989-994). But it was a failure really because only a handful of games came out. Although, games are still being made for it today (Apline Games).

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: x56h34 on February 22, 2005, 05:06:01 PM
What about systems like TurboGrafx and TurboDuo? Those were huge successes in Japan, however failed in N. America. :-?
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: PMC on February 22, 2005, 05:40:48 PM
How do you judge failure?  The Amiga was no failure...

My own vote goes to the 3DO.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: the_leander on February 22, 2005, 06:35:30 PM
Hrm,

Console wise I'd go with the 3do, which had some superb games but the price (initially) for the console was obscene.

Computer wise...

BeBox or CDTV (yes Amigas were a commercial success but the CDTV wasn't).
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Plus4 on February 22, 2005, 10:24:19 PM

I had some good fun wiv my Dreamcast.  People call that a failure - the build quality wasn't so good but the games were esp. Shenmue...
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 22, 2005, 11:01:01 PM
Quote

the build quality wasn't so good but the games were esp. Shenmue...
The build quality was excellent, I mean, it's very much PS2 quality
And I can say that because I have one (a DC, and a friend of mine has a ps2) :-D
Heck, I think most of the GameCube games can be ported to a DC with a minimum of quality loss
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 23, 2005, 10:49:39 AM
Mine would have to be the "Neo Geo Pocket Color".

These little babies were fantastic, and still are.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 23, 2005, 01:26:01 PM
Hey Yo!

I maybe getting a 3DO, it looks a good solid system.

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: graffias79 on February 23, 2005, 02:31:41 PM
Hmm would have to say Turbo Duo.  Not only does it play games very nicely still after 12 years, the build quality is amazing!  Very solid plastic, rugged CD-ROM mechanism, reads burned CDs, and has a homebrew following/demo scene.  Also if you happen to have the pleasure of owning one, hook it up to your stereo.  You will be amazed at the clarity and crispness of the CD audio playback.

Runners up:
Sega Dreamcast (Moderate success)
Sega Saturn (Doomed because of the SegaCD and 32x fiasco)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: x56h34 on February 23, 2005, 03:21:43 PM
Virtual Boy is kind of cool, however it's definitely not for everyone.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Star69 on February 23, 2005, 03:35:40 PM
Quote

x56h34 wrote:
Virtual Boy is kind of cool, however it's definitely not for everyone.


Virtual boy is kinda cool, but you could only play it for about 20 minutes before you got a headache and your eyes started to bleed.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 24, 2005, 12:13:18 AM
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Plus4 on February 24, 2005, 01:23:47 PM

Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Quote

the build quality wasn't so good but the games were esp. Shenmue...
The build quality was excellent, I mean, it's very much PS2 quality
And I can say that because I have one (a DC, and a friend of mine has a ps2) :-D
Heck, I think most of the GameCube games can be ported to a DC with a minimum of quality loss


I had one too and so did a few friends, the controllers in particluar were poor and reminded me of N64 controllers, very plasticy (PS2 has best controller of any console IMO).

Additionally those VMU's went wrong / fell out after a few months - No-one I knew had one that lasted a year...
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 24, 2005, 02:17:53 PM
well, got hardly a problem with those controllers, I can play quake 3 with it quite nicely already (I don't give a damn about the thingy being plastic or not, it seems to me solid enough).
So I think that's a matter of opinion.
But considering the fitting the vmu, I just got one, so, good you tell me this now :-/
(though I'm very carefull with it, unlike other ppl I see often)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 24, 2005, 02:55:33 PM
Hey yo!

The Dreamcast version of Quake 3 kicked butt most definately! :-) The VMU is okay, although the top of it becomes loose after a while.

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: odin on February 24, 2005, 03:21:01 PM
The Dreamcast controllers are way too small and cramped...not everyone has hands the size of a small child.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 24, 2005, 03:22:58 PM
Quote

odin wrote:
The Dreamcast controllers are way too small and cramped...not everyone has hands the size of a small child.


Hey yo!

I dunno Mr odin, i have big hands (hell that is why i am goal keeper!), and my hands were okay with the pad.

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: odin on February 24, 2005, 03:30:52 PM
I always get cramped hands after only 15 mins of play with the  DC controllers I have. Perhaps I should look at some thirdparty controllers or something. Then again I don't really like joypads in general. I'd rather have a decent joystick :-).
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 24, 2005, 06:36:33 PM
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

odin wrote:
The Dreamcast controllers are way too small and cramped...not everyone has hands the size of a small child.


Hey yo!

I dunno Mr odin, i have big hands (hell that is why i am goal keeper!), and my hands were okay with the pad.

Regards,


I've got shovel hands too, and I find the Gamecue to have the most comfortable to hold controller. PSX controllers are awful for me to hold.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: McNorris on February 24, 2005, 11:32:23 PM
@mdma

Some of our politics aside. We got a lot in common. I can't stand the PS2 controllers now. When I first got my gamecube I resented being forced to use an analog, but over time? Now PS2 won't do.

The Donkey Kongas are the ultimate in comfort. ;)

I'm only 31, but my hands will cramp on anything if I try to pull one of my old 12 hour video games sprees from my high school days. Getting old sucks
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: SyrTran on February 25, 2005, 03:14:34 AM
@CU_AMiGA

Quote
By failed consoles i mean:

Panasonic 3DO
Philips CDi
Sharp X68000
Sinclair Quantum Leap
Atari 5200
Atari Lynx
Sega Nomad
GP32
Sam Coupé


The Atari 5200 wasn't a failure.  At the time (early 80's) it was -the- console to get.  It only died because Warner Communication (now Time-Warner) decided to get out of home electronics.

Quote
....etc - The list goes on!!!

to the Atari 7800 and Jaguar, the Sega FX-32 (I dunno, that wasn't really a console, was it?) and Saturn, and let's not forget Nuon-based DVD players.

Being the owner of 3 Jags, I think I'd have to vote for the Dreamcast (I've never owned one).  It was the console with the most fans and the fewest games.

I'd vote for the Jag, but it wasn't successful enough to be a failure. :-D
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 25, 2005, 01:35:06 PM
Quote
Getting old sucks


You can say that again! :-D
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 25, 2005, 02:03:01 PM
After playing a couple of hours quake 3 with the dc controller I got indeed a bit of cramp in my hands.
Considering the vmu? Well, there's always cello/duct tape! :-D
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: seer on February 25, 2005, 06:00:30 PM
What about systems like TurboGrafx and TurboDuo? Those were huge successes in Japan, however failed in N. America.

Failed ? I thought the "Turbo" consoles were just never marketed outside of Japan ? They seemed rather popular with imports
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: SamuraiCrow on February 25, 2005, 07:05:44 PM
I remember the TurboGrafx 16 being sold in WalMart at about the time the SuperNES came out.  It was a bit weak with only an 8-bit processor when compared with the 65816 of the SNES and the 68000 of the Sega Genesis.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: bloodline on February 25, 2005, 08:01:41 PM
What is a VMU?
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 25, 2005, 08:16:57 PM
Quote

bloodline wrote:
What is a VMU?


Something a pot of live yoghurt and a week long course of antibiotics gets rid of usually! ;-)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 26, 2005, 03:07:14 PM
Quote

mdma wrote:
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.


Hey Yo!

I have a GP32 FLU. Bloody good machines they are. Mega Drive emaultion and SNES are gob smacking :shock:

Regards
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 27, 2005, 01:10:32 PM
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.


Hey Yo!

I have a GP32 FLU. Bloody good machines they are. Mega Drive emaultion and SNES are gob smacking :shock:

Regards


Whats the difference between the FLU and the BLU versions?
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: that_punk_guy on February 27, 2005, 06:41:22 PM
Hey Yo!

I... Sorry, I just wanted to be cool. :-D
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 27, 2005, 07:15:59 PM
Quote

bloodline wrote:
What is a VMU?
The 'Visual Memory Unit' of the sega Dreamcast (sold seperately)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 27, 2005, 08:42:43 PM
Quote

mdma wrote:
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
Quote

mdma wrote:
Anyone got a GP32 BLU?

I'm thinking of getting one, because of all the different emulators you can get for it, even the Playstation! :-o

I haven't seen any evidence of a UAE port to it yet though.


Hey Yo!

I have a GP32 FLU. Bloody good machines they are. Mega Drive emaultion and SNES are gob smacking :shock:

Regards


Whats the difference between the FLU and the BLU versions?


Hey Yo!

The FLU stands for "Front Lit Unit" (which has a front light on the screen similar to GBA SP) and BLU stands for "Back                                  Lit Unit" (which is similar to the back lit handhelds like Game Gear Atari Lynx). I hope this helps

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 27, 2005, 08:46:37 PM
considering the multimedia abilities of the GP32 I'm quite sceptical.
Unless an usb stick can be used on the usb port (or an external cd-r/dvd combo),
'cuz these smart media cards seem not to be that common nowadays and 128 mb seems to be the maximum
also a pity there's no touch screen, if there was, you really could replace yer palmtop with it

maybe time for a gp128? :-)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 27, 2005, 08:55:10 PM
@Speel

Did you have any trouble with the connector for the power supply on the Atari Lynx. My old one came loose and broke. And my newer one is coming a little loose, but am having it repaired and made more stable.

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: Speelgoedmannetje on February 27, 2005, 08:56:37 PM
never had any troubles with that :-?
(btw, I got a lynx 2)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 27, 2005, 10:37:53 PM
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:
@Speel

Did you have any trouble with the connector for the power supply on the Atari Lynx. My old one came loose and broke. And my newer one is coming a little loose, but am having it repaired and made more stable.

Regards,


I never had trouble with my Lynx.  It was built like a Volvo! :-D
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: on February 27, 2005, 10:40:22 PM
Quote

CU_AMiGA wrote:

Hey Yo!

The FLU stands for "Front Lit Unit" (which has a front light on the screen similar to GBA SP) and BLU stands for "Back                                  Lit Unit" (which is similar to the back lit handhelds like Game Gear Atari Lynx). I hope this helps

Regards,


Cheers, seems blindingly obvious now! :-)
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 28, 2005, 09:15:02 AM
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
never had any troubles with that :-?
(btw, I got a lynx 2)


Hey Yo!

Yeah i had the MK 2 version as well.

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 28, 2005, 09:24:50 AM
Quote

that_punk_guy wrote:
Hey Yo!

I... Sorry, I just wanted to be cool. :-D


Hey Yo!

Would now be a good time to get back to you about the PM i sent you referring to Sumner7's tribute song?

Regards,
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: that_punk_guy on February 28, 2005, 11:08:25 AM
Oh yeah, that... Uhhh.

I think that'd be best left to someone who really knows him.
Title: Re: The Best "Failed" Console / Computer?
Post by: CU_AMiGA on February 28, 2005, 11:09:53 AM
I think we have seen the best of Sumner7 on these forums :-)

Regards,