Amiga.org

Amiga computer related discussion => Amiga Software Issues and Discussion => Topic started by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 05:17:30 PM

Title: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 05:17:30 PM
do i have to have 3.1 kickstart for this OS upgrade?
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: adolescent on August 19, 2004, 05:31:09 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 05:35:08 PM
why?

there is so little difference between 3.0 n 3.1 if i remember rightly, and what are the differences?

and is it worth buying 3.9?

i currently still have 3.0

but there is 3.5 and 3.9 on ebay at the moment, and i was thinking of upgrading to one
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: adolescent on August 19, 2004, 05:49:30 PM
The main advantages of OS3.5/3.9 are the TCP/IP stack, large HD support, CDFS, and other support software.  If none of this interests you, then stick to OS3.0/3.1.  
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 09:31:23 PM
currently i'm trying to get network suppoert running on my 1200, see the netconnect issue in the post above

and i have cd running already,

large hard drive support would be nice, but idont need it at the moment - but for the future, yes it'll be nice
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Piru on August 19, 2004, 09:36:45 PM
Quote
The main advantages of OS3.5/3.9 are the TCP/IP stack,

AOS 3.5 doesn't include full TCP/IP stack, but Miami demo (30 min timeout, also available in Aminet).
The excuse:
Code: [Select]

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Unfortunately it couldn't be done in lastmimnute.
Miami OEM couldn't be finished in time, therefore a Demoversion
that is restricted to 30 minutes is included. The OEM Version
will be made available via Internet shortly.
Please lookout for Notes in the Amiga press and on the Amiga Homepage
www.amiga.com.

We thank you for your understanding.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

WICHTIGER HINWEIS:

Leider hat es in letzter Minute nicht mehr geklappt.
Miami OEM konnte nicht rechtzeitig fertiggestellt werden, weshalb
eine auf 30 Minuten beschränkte Demoversion beiliegt. Die OEM Version
wird in Kürze über das Internet verfügbar gemacht.
Bitte beachten Sie Hinweise in der Fachpresse und auf der
Amiga Homepage www.amiga.de.

Wir danken für Ihr Verständnis.


LastMinute                         819 ----rwed 05-Oct-99 16:46:37
(Reproduced here without permission from Haage & Partner. Sue me.)

AOS 3.5 never got TCP/IP stack, even though it was advertised to include it.

AOS 3.9 contains illegal copy (http://www.iki.fi/too/amitcp.txt) of AmiTCP/IP.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 09:43:56 PM
i downloaded the miami demo and it doesnt work properly

or doesnt install properly

i have a full original copy of the netconnect V2.3 software ,

i'll scan the CD, coz i know you guys hate "WAREZ" so much, but the serial code included with it wont go throught the licence thingy, so it wont unpack genesis 4.6



edit:

linky:  http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0RgDpAmIVMgLgQLZBNZ6RMr01kd!xcMLenVv9OTL3hnc!92dI30lf2h!cCCLNgEDGOUJ3gcWwpMFnBzBOo9s2rq9vfzaO9qPmd7rdk6n88Ak/netconnect23.jpg?dc=4675485536041499519
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Lemonty on August 19, 2004, 09:54:03 PM
I had a 3.0 kickstart setup a few years ago on an A1200. I renumbered the version numbers of "dos.library" and "exec.library" to the required 41.xx. I used a program called "libchange" IIRC from Aminet. This worked okay for OS35. Heh.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 10:00:28 PM
cool i'll try that, i mean from what i heard, they reboot from they're own roms anyway, so i cant se what the big deal about having roms previus to that is in the first place
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: cecilia on August 19, 2004, 10:18:18 PM
Os3.9 is worth having.
upgrade - it's more stable.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 19, 2004, 10:32:50 PM
i hear there's two editions as well :(

what's the difference betwen those


sorry excuse my lameness, its been about 7 years since i had an amiga, and i havent been keeping up very much
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: redrumloa on August 19, 2004, 10:40:15 PM
If you decide on OS3.5, I still have them for $22 on my eShop (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=4598&item=5107261209).
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: blobrana on August 19, 2004, 10:50:18 PM
@redrumloa

[color=5196f3][/color]

Hum,
you should perhaps have the option to buy Amiga 3.1 ROMs with it in a sort of `upgrade bundle` sort of way...

(er, since it is really useless with out it)

[color=5196f3]
[/color]
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: redrumloa on August 19, 2004, 11:19:44 PM
@blobrana

I wish I could find a good stock of OS3.1 ROMS. I may have a line on some A500/A2000 ROMS, but no A3k/A4/A1200:-(
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: rayt on August 19, 2004, 11:50:54 PM
Quote
The main advantages of OS3.5/3.9 are the TCP/IP stack, large HD support, CDFS, and other support software. If none of this interests you, then stick to OS3.0/3.1.


Plus things as integrated deficons, newicons, integrated search function, async wb, improved datatypes that make it much more useful than 3.0/3.1.. everyone with 3.1 roms really should get OS3.9, its well worth its money..
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Doobrey on August 19, 2004, 11:53:36 PM
Quote

_caddy_ wrote:
i mean from what i heard, they reboot from they're own roms anyway


Not quite..
 OS3.5 and 3.9 replaces some of the modules from the 3.1 rom and reboots. The romupdate file isn`t a rom image ,so it can`t be softkicked they way other programs like degraders can.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: TjLaZer on August 19, 2004, 11:54:21 PM
You can softkick 3.1 and use OS3.5/3.9, but you cannot patch the OS with the patch file in devs.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: _caddy_ on August 20, 2004, 12:54:05 AM
Os3.5

all this just so i can play some of my old games on a real amiga, hehehehe


and yeah, i might buy os3.9 and a set of roms

but it'll cost like £30, and i'm a poor student

so it may take a while

lol
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: adolescent on August 20, 2004, 01:12:05 AM
Quote

rayt wrote:
...integrated search function...


Where is this?  The Find utility in the System folder?  If so, I don't consider that very integrated.

I agree though that 3.9 is a very nice OS and has much more functionality than 3.0/3.1.  But, if you're only going to play games then don't bother.
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Piru on August 20, 2004, 02:52:12 AM
@TjLaZer
Quote
You can softkick 3.1 and use OS3.5/3.9, but you cannot patch the OS with the patch file in devs.

Why not?
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Lemmink on August 20, 2004, 07:48:04 AM
Quote

Quote

...integrated search function...


Where is this?  The Find utility in the System folder?  If so, I don't consider that very integrated.


Have you recently looked into the Window menu  ?
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Cyberus on August 20, 2004, 01:34:07 PM
Quote

_caddy_ wrote:
i hear there's two editions as well :(

what's the difference betwen those


Yeah I heard that, does anyone know if there is a difference?
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: w00p on August 24, 2004, 04:05:07 PM
How does OS 3.9 run on a stock A1200? Just wondering, as I was looking at upgrading as well to either OS 3.5 or OS3.9. The Amiga I just picked up from eBay has a 68020 accelerator in it I think (I haven't got it yet). How hard is it to attach a CD-Rom to the Amiga 1200? I'll go check some other threads on this as well. Thanks!
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: Thomas on August 24, 2004, 04:56:32 PM
Quote

How does OS 3.9 run on a stock A1200?


It doesn't. You need at least 6MB RAM.

To provisorily connect a CD drive should not be too difficult. You need a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter and a power cable. However you need to leave the case open and the drive lies uncovered on the table.

Another possibility is to connect the Amiga HDD to a PC and use WinUAE to install the OS.

Bye,
Thomas
Title: Re: Os3.5
Post by: adolescent on August 24, 2004, 05:53:47 PM
Quote

Lemmink wrote:
Quote

Where is this?  The Find utility in the System folder?  If so, I don't consider that very integrated.


Have you recently looked into the Window menu  ?


Yes, that just runs the Find utility from the System folder.  I wouldn't call that integrated (it doesn't even use the current window as the search point so I don't know why it's in the Window menu).  I was hoping there was a better solution that I'd overlooked.