|
|
| 2.04 with AMIX session | ||
 |
||
| Previous Image | Next Image | ||
|
Description: Not a terribly exciting picture, but I don't think I saw any of WB 2.x so here's one! This is on my "unexpanded" superkick A3000 with just ECS and an X-Surf. In the upper right is a telnet session to the 3000UX running AMIX 2.03, with the lame trick of getting 9k+ days uptime! :-)
Picture Stats: Views: 4089 Filesize: 37.55kB Height: 768 Width: 1024 Posted by: Failure at August 15, 2004, 06:32:56 AM Image Linking Codes
|
||
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this picture. |
| trekiej Posts:2667 | February 21, 2018, 09:06:46 PM It is interesting to see other OSes on Amiga. |
| SamOS39 Posts:357 | February 14, 2008, 08:14:22 PM NARUTO!! |
| Rippie Posts:17 
| October 14, 2004, 10:59:35 PM *useless comment* Naruto O.o |
| Failure Posts:332 | August 19, 2004, 11:36:13 PM The point of AMIX? Morbid curiosity I guess ;-) I work with UN*X systems daily (primarily Linux) and if nothing else, AMIX has given me a lot of respect for open standards, and how far UNIX-style OS have come while maintaining so much compatability. Taking AMIX 1.1, which was released in 1990 I believe, and mounting a 600+GB NFS share on a Linux box running the 2.6.7 kernel is impressive to me. It's like a minor miracle. Same with x11, AMIX using X11R4 talking to XFree86 4.3. |
| whabang Posts:7270 | August 19, 2004, 12:08:01 PM :flame: :lol: |
| Cyberus Posts:5696
| August 19, 2004, 12:11:56 AM Quote
Pure geek, is the answer I guess. I mean, what could be more geeky than this? And lets face it, we're all geeks in a sense, othewise we wouldn't be using a dead platform.... Am I gonne get flamed as well for that last comment? :lol: :flameon: |
| whabang Posts:7270 | August 18, 2004, 03:25:57 PM I like the backdrop. I'm going to get flamed for this, but what use is there for AMIX today? It's not really usable anymore, right? :-? |