I dont think anyone is "mistaken". I just think weve had different experiences..
For example: And A500 rev3/rev5 board has 16 (256kx1)ram chips just to make 512k. This pulls significantly more current than 4 (256kx4) chips on a rev 6a (or later board). You throw in an early model A501 expansion, and guess what.. ANOTHER 16 chips.. Thats 32 ram chips instead of 8 on the later models.
Also, look at the size difference in the stepper motors on the early floppy drives (like the A1010 and early "all metal" mechs used in the first A500s & A1011s) versus the new "plastic" ones used in the later A500s. Floppy drives are consntantly starting & stopping spindles and "grinding away" at the disks moving the head steppers.. Also remember with MFM, it cant start & stop one drive spindle independantly, it does both simulatneously.
Also, look at early hardisk controllers that used all DIP package logic, and tons of it, versus the newer designs that only had one or two small surface mount package custom chips. (eg. the A590 versus the GVP A500 HD+/8)... big difference..
Its also possible that commodore "beefed up" the PSUs in later A500s after so many people b!tched about them burning up in earlier units.
I would expect the A1200/A600 motherboards to be significantly less power-hungry than an A500 due to the fact that almost everything had been replaced with newer, smaller, surface-mount components.
So you see, there's quite a few factors here. I believe him when he says he had problems. Ive heard others say the same thing. Im just glad my particular combinations work with a single stock PSU. Id hate to have YET ANOTHER power cord to deal with, or some "hacked PC unit" looking PSU..