Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What is the least successful OS ever sold?  (Read 5836 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CritAnime

  • Previous Life Time Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1143
    • Show all replies
Re: What is the least successful OS ever sold?
« on: June 18, 2011, 11:26:19 PM »
I have thought, and always will think, that Windows ME is the worst, nay atrocious, OS I have ever had the misfortune to use. It was buggy, slow, leaked memory, blue-screened, died more times than super meat boy and ate resources like it was going out of fashion.

Offline CritAnime

  • Previous Life Time Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1143
    • Show all replies
Re: What is the least successful OS ever sold?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2011, 11:53:42 PM »
I was a 98 user then skipped ME and went to XP for my home desktop. We had ME on the machines at college and thats what we found all the issues on it. But your right 98 did suffer with these things. We just found that ME was producing the errors on a more regular basis. In the end we reverted the test machines back to 98 then to 2000 when it became available.
 
@Minuous
Lol lets not go there. We may open this thread upto a whole world of trouble :rofl:
« Last Edit: June 18, 2011, 11:57:57 PM by CritAnime »
 

Offline CritAnime

  • Previous Life Time Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1143
    • Show all replies
Re: What is the least successful OS ever sold?
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2011, 02:28:10 PM »
Would Norton Desktop be considered a shall or OS? I think it's more likely a shell but I will submit it on here to see what people think.