Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: SAMs 440/460  (Read 9859 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Golem!dk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 414
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.google.com/
Re: SAMs 440/460
« on: January 25, 2011, 08:05:44 PM »
Quote from: yakumo9275;609033
I'd rather have a slightly slower cpu with more ram and better video card and more bandwidth. Its still a 1ghz ppc460 with fpu, just lacking altivec :)

how many windows can morphos do for composition/3d with a 32mb radeon 9250 vs a radeonhd 4650 1gb on my sam build amigaos 4.1 when your running a 1920x1200 screen?

333mhz DDR PC2700 vs 533 mhz DDR2 PC4200...

that 'faster' mac mini has a lot of deficiencies vs the sam 460 board.

the sam460 fpu is no match for having altivec instructions tho...

You should post some numbers for real tasks on that sam, then we can start making comparisons. There's more to a CPU than GHz alone, and video cards also need drivers to use their features.
~
 

Offline Golem!dk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 414
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.google.com/
Re: SAMs 440/460
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2011, 02:10:27 PM »
Quote from: klx300r;609300
the only reason is the wrong reason in this thread because yakumo9275 specifically only asked about the Sam460ex.  After the usual MOS suspects attacked & the OP, as well as others, told you to stop it & surprise surprise you guys are still at it.

Please create another thread about the virtues of MOS on old Macs and try to stop putting down other camps for a change.

Attacked? Funny that... I guess it depends on your perspective, maybe you could take a chill pill and read all posts in the thread again?
~
 

Offline Golem!dk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 414
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.google.com/
Re: SAMs 440/460
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2011, 02:21:02 PM »
Quote from: klx300r;609304
figure of speech...perhaps you should read all posts in the thread again?

You know I actually did before I wrote my post, just to see who did the derailing.
~
 

Offline Golem!dk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 414
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.google.com/
Re: SAMs 440/460
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2011, 02:47:47 PM »
@klx300r
So... factual (perhaps off topic) information hurts, so that makes it ok to lash out?
~