No, you're totally missing the point. It's not about the fact that you can see the pixels if you're close enough. That's obvious with CRTs displays. The problem with CM8833-II is that the pixels are very visiable, the raster is strangely made and it causes every pixel to be too noticeable even from a distance. I see this for the first time. I've used many CRTs in my life and I never noticed anything like this.
What I wanted to achieve? 1084S-level image. Philips CM8833-II has a much worse raster.
My Dreamcast performs great via RGB with CM8833-II but that's mainly 3D graphics and the raster isn't a problem in 3D. It's a problem in 2D. For example, Kickstart 1.3's start-up screen on my A500 looks like crap on this monitor because you can see a net of pixels even from big distance. The image doesn't look solid - it looks as if it was made from grains of sand.