@Matt_H, wiser3:
>Suggestion: can we get these Commodore BOOPSI classes to become part of the official OS distribution?
With the exception of led.image, they all have ReAction equivalents which are considerably better.
>Yes, more BOOPSI please. Greatly preferred over ReAction.
ReAction is a set of standard BOOPSI classes, so that statement doesn't really make sense.
>There's label.image and a new cycle.gadget on the BOOPSI front that never made it out of Commodore HQ.
ReAction has label.image and chooser.gadget.
>The 1993 DevCon notes also detail planned directions for the UI, of which those BOOPSI classes were the beginning. Would it make sense to continue down that path?
Yes, it would. ReAction is that path.