Did you really say that? There is no definition of context; you stated that the Mac OS is simpler for "average Joes" to use (so is a pencil and paper) than an Amiga; and in some sort of "a deeper sense than to get things done doesn't factor in." The meaning behind this eludes me.
This is what you wrote, WRT Unix
Amiga's OS takes it place for just flat out being simpler to understand and use.
Your argument was about simplicity. Not that you mention what about Amiga OS is so simple. Getting it? Installing it? Using it? Doing anything useful with it? Seems like Chromebook has a clear advantage in each of these areas.
You mention nothing of a "niche where Amiga could be established with the general populace" in either post (what is this niche, since it also remains undefined in your post?);
No, that was defined by you, saying that Amiga could take the place of Unix in typical home settings.
then you state that the Chromebook is "more attractive in the senses that have any relevance to the average consumer." Again you describe multiple "senses" without saying what they are, and there is no comment on what you feel is of "relevance to the average consumer."
I described those in the post before;
People rather think in practical terms like "how do I get it on the network", "how do I browse facebook", "where do I find applications", "where do I get support" or "how do I write a rich text document" than things like "how does this work from top to bottom".
Somehow in all of this you have completely failed to address my arguments, and I am not cynical enough to think that someone wouldn't have beeen able to put the context together the way I have above, so what's your point?
