Hi,
@Tripitaka,
Don't go getting your panties in a tightwad, does it really, really matter.
Yes it does. I have no problem with opinion or fact but opinion as fact is just distortion of truth and has no place in any discussion among adults. I'm British dammit and I just wont tolerate that sort of tomfoolery.
As to what I want from a new Amiga; To be honest I liked the approach that Henrycase proposed on this page:
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=60529&page=7Memrisistor FPGA based hardware would be a good start. In the mean time CUSA should have licensed the Amiga name to Hyperion and worked alongside the Natami team for a genuine OS3.9 Commodore Amiga. In many ways a memresistor FPGA based Amiga would have seemed quite a natural evolution from the SAMs, X1000 and Natami as they all have FPGA or XMOS, ie. programmable chips. If only they had asked me.
And whilst I'm thinking about it, a PPC card for Natami and a Super-AGA board for SAM and X1000 would add a nice touch of unity.
This would all require co-operation between CUSA, Hyperion and the Natami team of course so I can't see it happening.
This is all only my opinion of course, everyone is entitled to one.
Come to think of it OS3.9 has a few libraries and datatypes etc.. that have been updated by other people and could do with a few other tweaks. Perhaps a fresh coat of paint would be good for a Commodore Amiga Natami release, they could call it AmigaOS Trinity or something else funky.