A1260, why does wanting to transfer registration to an entirely different machine - therefore making the original registered copy of the software entirely inoperable in anything other than "demo" 30 minute form on the initial machine make a person a pirate?
That is, you would remove key from your another machince while you are using it on another.
Ludicrous claims out of some of you. To reiterate: User regs the OS on Mac #1. User buys a better Mac to use, wants to transfer the OS license to the new Mac, therefore making the initial license entirely invalid on "Mac 1". User keeps Mac 1 for OS X, Linux, or a doorstop, not that it matters much what he does with it, the end result being is "Mac 1" is no longer considered a MOS box. How's that equal piracy in the least?
By the way did you notice you have already got two copies of OS X?
Has absolutely NOTHING to do with piracy and tbh the implications are rather sad, lol. How the concept of "1 copy paid for, 1 copy used" got so bent out of shape is beyond me.
Any idea how to restrict this to "1 copy paid for, 1 copy used" and not being shared to friends? I have no problem understanding what you are trying to say here but it just isnt possible. If it wasnt tied to one machine it would have to be tied to one user or just use generic key that works everywhere.
I'm fine with MOS handling regs as they see fit, but this piracy babble from the fanboys, nah, lol.
Hmm... I guess English speaking world is quite sensitive to pirate/piracy word. My apologizes.