Most people that have graphics cards aren't using them on a 68020 so your comparison isn't valid. The speed up for my 040 on an RTG card over AGA was immediately obvious.
-edit-
Oh wait, you are referring to modern cards on other systems, not RTG versus AGA. Yeah, you have a point. I currently have a GTX260, hopefully I won't get any newer card that isn't at least 50% faster.
Think the point is you get something for nothing, in 1992 a SIMM slot for A1200 fast ram and Akiko would have helped sales against £999 386DX 25/33mhz PCs.
Commodore didn't go bankrupt because nobody wrote Doom style games for Retina or Picasso graphics card equipped 33mhz 040s you know
A1200 was not thought out properly, a SIMM slot costing 50 pence would have allowed users to easily double the speed of the new fashionable Doom style crap popping up everywhere and if Akiko was on the motherboard too thats 50% for Akiko and 100% for CPU speed increase for the price of a 512kb SIMM purchase compared to what we were stuck with. And luckily for us because Amiga games were so badly programmed most of that increase in speed is automatic.
A1200 had no Akiko option and bare FAST RAM cards alone were £125 with no memory included for A1200s and CD32 was an 'unexpandable toy' unless you spent another £300 on an SX32 type device. £650 for a 14mhz computer vs £999 for a 40mhz one with monitor and 16bit sound card from Win/Tel world.
Commercial suicide. Can you imagine Sega or Nintendo or Sony getting themselves in that situation? Exactly.
Sad thing is the A1400 (A1200 with CD drive and 28mhz 020 and 2mb Fast Ram in A3000 style 3 piece case design was nearly ready for 3rd quarter 94).