Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: PPC is bad bad bad  (Read 34773 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jarrody2k

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 126
    • Show all replies
Re: PPC is bad bad bad
« on: May 03, 2002, 03:35:30 PM »
quote]OS4 on X86, over my dead body! But you you are entitled to your opinion. As you said, more people think like you but there are also a lot that adore PPC. Like me. And so what if I have to pay a bit more for PPC hardware. [/quote]

You know, adoration doesn't back up an opinion much.  Objectivity, however, does that a lot more.  While waiting to be more objective on the tricky subject of cross-processor benchmarking, you can becomes at least try to be more enlightened with the material that has been produced so far

http://homepage.mac.com/nopea1/benchmark/

Benchmarks using cross-compilation tasks.  The cross-gcc benchmark shows a build of Sparc objects using GCC on Linux for two PPC machines and two X86 machines.  The task is heavily integer based and PPC suffered a whooping.


http://www.lowendmac.com/myturn/01/0910.html

Attempts to explain how benchmarking between the two processors may end up hurting Apple.  Be carefully of the benchmarking EXAMPLE he has provided.  The values were based on "personal experience".  *rolls eyes, slaps forehead!!*


http://arstechnica.com/cpu/01q2/p4andg4e/p4andg4e-1.html

The Pentium 4 and the G4e: an Architectural Comparison


Happy reading.

Oh yeah, and PPC SUCKS!  :-P