Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Performance?  (Read 10732 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jj

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4051
  • Country: wales
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by jj
Re: Performance?
« Reply #29 from previous page: March 30, 2011, 12:27:01 PM »
Quote from: mt12345;625951
Does MorphOS make use of dual processor?

nope
“We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw

Xbox Live: S0ulA55a551n2
 
Registered MorphsOS 3.13 user on Powerbook G4 15"
 

Offline paolone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 382
    • Show only replies by paolone
    • http://www.icarosdesktop.org
Re: Performance?
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2011, 04:29:50 PM »
Quote from: Amiga_Nut;625960
Off topic a bit, but I used to play full screen standard 700mb DVDrips on a 266mhz P2 mobile processor with just 192mb RAM. It did have the Mobility Rage Pro ATI mobile chipset however but this is far inferior to any desktop machine's GPU card in 100s of Mhz CPU speed.

That was with Windows 98.

I went from my former 400 MHz K6 processor to a nice faster 1GHz Athlon when I saw how it played DVD rips, and you're arguing that a 266 MHz mobile P2 would have been enough? Please don't go on kidding: in order to play movies encoded at decent bitrates without loosing frames, you need power.

On the other hand, my old G3/400 iBook performed enough well with DivX videos, but it skipped frames too. I should remove a little dust from it and try it again...
p.bes

 

Offline vidarh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 409
    • Show only replies by vidarh
Re: Performance?
« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2011, 04:34:44 PM »
Quote from: paolone;626015
I went from my former 400 MHz K6 processor to a nice faster 1GHz Athlon when I saw how it played DVD rips, and you're arguing that a 266 MHz mobile P2 would have been enough?


He said he had a Mobility Rage Pro GPU - it has hardware video decoding support. Makes all the difference.
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: Performance?
« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2011, 05:43:44 PM »
Quote from: vidarh;626017
He said he had a Mobility Rage Pro GPU - it has hardware video decoding support. Makes all the difference.

Well, I've owned a few Rage 128 pro cards (including a couple of the relatively rare higher clocked ones) and I've got to agree that a 266MHz PII would be pushing it.
It wouldn't take much to see dropped frames on that type of system.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline mt12345Topic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 62
    • Show only replies by mt12345
Re: Performance?
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2011, 10:18:48 PM »
Quote from: Iggy;625893


[Originally Posted by mt12345]
   [Forget it. I'll go for 8500/9000]

Yep, much better performance than the 7000. Right now probably the two best options


9000 or 9200?
I heard that 9000 works better but 9200 has 128MB...
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: Performance?
« Reply #34 on: March 31, 2011, 11:02:31 PM »
Quote from: mt12345;626369
9000 or 9200?
I heard that 9000 works better but 9200 has 128MB...

Identical except the 9200 is an AGP8X part (and therefore is found in PCs and requires flashing and taping pins 3 and 11).
The 9000 is available as a 128MB card too.
The 8500 is faster and with its slower derivative the 8500LE/9100 also has more texture units and vertex shaders.
However, the Apple 8500 only has 64MB so any PC card flashed with an Apple BIOS will also be limited to 64MB (regardless of the built in memory).

Avoid the 9200SE or the 9250 which has a 64bit memory bus and is slower.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline mt12345Topic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 62
    • Show only replies by mt12345
Re: Performance?
« Reply #35 on: April 01, 2011, 01:22:59 AM »
Quote from: Iggy;625204

When compared to an Efika, a 400Mhz Powermac with 512MB of memory would definitely be superior.


What is Efika's CPU, actually? I read somewhere that it's comparable to (or based on)  603e.