Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970  (Read 2280 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Hammer
More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« on: October 17, 2002, 11:17:12 AM »
More details on the IBM’s future PPC 970 CPU from ArsTechnica.

Click here for the article


Quote
Quoting from Arstechnica
Now for some architectural details:

L1 data cache: 32 KB
L1 instruction cache: 64 KB
L2 cache: 512K
Registers:
32 64-bit general purpose registers
32 64-bit floating-point registers
32 128-bit vector registers
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2002, 11:40:41 AM »
dR00L!
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline Orgin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 287
    • Show only replies by Orgin
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2002, 12:03:49 PM »
If it was released this year or in first quarter of 2003 then Dr000L indeed. But well, it won't be...

Looks more like a perhelia product to me.

/Björn
Mooh?
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2002, 12:40:25 PM »
Quote
Looks more like a perhelia product to me.

Probably. :-(
Not that Parhelia is a bad product...  :-)
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2002, 12:41:53 PM »
Quote
then Dr000L indeed

Not Dr000L - It's spelled dR00L, y00 14m3R!  :-D
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline Orgin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 287
    • Show only replies by Orgin
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2002, 12:57:14 PM »
Quote
Not that Parhelia is a bad product...


Indeed not. Just not very competitive in the surrounding market.

/Björn
Mooh?
 

Offline Orgin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 287
    • Show only replies by Orgin
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2002, 12:58:21 PM »
Quote
Not Dr000L - It's spelled dR00L, y00 14m3R!


Argh! Sorry!  ;o)

/Björn
Mooh?
 

Offline whabang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 7270
    • Show only replies by whabang
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2002, 01:28:18 PM »
Quote
Indeed not. Just not very competitive in the surrounding market.

Unfortunately no, however, I'm still waiting for Matrox' big return...
Beating the dead horse since 2002.
 

Offline olegil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 955
    • Show only replies by olegil
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2002, 03:17:28 PM »
Have any of you guys seen the Parhelia in action? I drooled. Of course, I'm in broadcasting. But still, it's the first time I've seen video out resembling Commodore 1985 picture quality from a PC  :-D
 

Offline Elektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1424
    • Show only replies by Elektro
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2002, 04:04:40 PM »
U have to admit for all the hype Parhelia was stirring it was a big dissapointment.
#amiga.org @ irc.synirc.net
 

Offline seer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1453
    • Show only replies by seer
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2002, 07:07:00 PM »
Have any of you guys seen the Parhelia in action?

Use one right now.. Great 2D and 3D card.. Benchmarks mean nothing. Just hope that sometime programmers are going to use EMBM more..

To bad I'm going to buy a house, so the 3 flatscreens I wanted to buy are going to have to wait... :-(
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you.
~
 

Offline seer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1453
    • Show only replies by seer
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2002, 07:09:27 PM »
U have to admit for all the hype Parhelia was stirring it was a big dissapointment.

Nah, i't just a tad slower the a GeForce4/4400, and the 2D gfx are much better, DVD movies look pretty good here  ;-)

Offcourse the new ATI card kicks everybodies a$$, so for 3D gaming, take your pick.
~
Everything you say will be misquoted and used against you.
~
 

Offline olegil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 955
    • Show only replies by olegil
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2002, 08:51:21 PM »
Hype? Star Wars episode 2 was hyped to death. Parhelia was merely "publically mentioned" in comparison  :-P
 

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Hammer
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2002, 11:46:48 PM »
Both Matrox* and nVidia have yet to release their true DirectX 9 Class GPU part.
*Note that Perhelia is not a true DirectX 9, it’s merely a spring board towards that goal.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline HammerTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Hammer
Re: More details on IBM’s proposed PPC 970
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2002, 11:51:00 PM »
Quote
Offcourse the new ATI card kicks everybodies a$$, so for 3D gaming, take your pick.

For 3D Application performance, NV25 (Quadro 4 900XGL) still beats* R300 (Radon 9700).
Refer to http://www.xbitlabs.com/video/3dsmax5/

It’s interesting to note that the same NV25 chips (i.e. GF4 vs Q4GL) have different out comes due to minor driver and clock speed differences.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.