Rogue wrote:
I would consider it as intended fraud.
Please be VERY careful with such allegations. Calling someone a fraud is serious. Unless you have anything more to back you up then "this made me thinking", I would recommend to keep quiet, OK?
Legal professionals have a wording for that:
"deceit and fraudulent concealment"
Legal professionals also have a word for unproven allegations. Just because we're on the internet here doesn't give freedom of speech a new twist.
Awwwwwwww - please, don't get me wrong every time, Hans-Jörg!
If you lean back and read my posting again you will notice that neigther I didn't *alledge* anything, nor did I call *someONE* a fraud - all I did was *WONDERING IF* some aspects of this NDA thingie - namely the concealment of problems of the product - could be seen as fraud.
And to explain what I mean I gave you an real example (selling used cars).
I had to experience this myself, as I was the person who sold the old car and wrote in the contract (in the good believ that this would *NOT* be misunderstandable) "Zählerstand".
For me "Zählerstand" always meant "was auf dem Zähler stand" (what stood on the counter).
But the judge taught me that I should have written "abgelesener Zählerstand" (read from the counter) and sentenced me to pay back a part of the purchase price to the purchaser, as - here in Germany - leaving away the word "abgelesen" (read from) already is a matter of fact of fraud and is specifically called "deceit and fraudulent concealment" in German law.
He acknowledged that the juristical reading was not widely publically known and therefor I just had to pay back a part of the price instead of receiving a "real punishment".
(From my point of view this was just capillaris separativus - but this didn't save me from paying :pissed: )
And as I seemed to recognize parallels to that NDA thingie (intentionally not to inform the public/potential customers about harware issues - as I understood it) I seriously was wondering if this is not the same sort of fraud - just with the difference that this one appears to be kind of legal (
) as its based on an contract/agreement (NDA).
So it should be very clear now that I never called *someONE* a fraud - rather *someTHING* (this NDA process).
So please - do me one favour:
Don't get me (intentionally? :-? ) wrong that way that you think I would like to start a flamewar - I just want your *OPINIONS* on that!
And please notice that I have always been and still am a strong supporter of Classic Amigas.
Regarding the future path I didn't make up my mind until now (So treat me well - it might have some positive effect on my buying decisions ;-) ).
I will have to wait and see which of the two systems meets my needs better, once they are completely done and available in the stores...
:-D