Pegasos Gothenburg Show 2002 announced

[samface]

Aha! Why wasn't AMax prosecuted then?
It wasn't running MacOS under MacOS!
It was running MacOS under AmigaOS using
the MacOS ROM on a card (+ a floppy interface).

That emulator still not claimed to be an OS on it's own.

[AmiGR]

Why don't you refer to the announcement you posted
earlier?
What does it mention? *Under* MorphOS a Mixed Mode AmigaOS *RUNS* as a multithreaded application/driver. Only infriging thing I find in MorphOS right now is the use of the AmigaOS name
in the first announcements.
So, NO the emulator did NOT claim to be an OS by it's own.
It runned UNDER an OS, MorphOS.

[samface]

I don't have time for this anymore... The emulator was required in order for the MorphOS to function, it was running as an integrated part of the OS and most importantly, it was also marketed as a function of the OS. Face it, it's a dead end, you've painted yourself into a corner and can't get out without admitting your mistake. I'm too tired for this and I'm going to bed now, goodnight.

[AmiGR]

If you ever bothered to run MorphOS with maximum
debug and take a look at the boot logs, you would know that this is wrong... I also have a test version
that doesn't need it all, it just boots quark, for debug
without any extra help by the user.

[AmiGR]

If you don't want to continue this debate, shut up,
do not say a SINGLE word about it until AFTER the court... If there's going to be one.
If you do not want to shut up, don't give up now:)

[blubbe]

Hmm.. hehe, this thread is till going ??!

@samface

MorphOS may technically use it the same way as the A-Max but as they are using this for their competing product to the AmigaOS (which the ROM is a part of) then it is per definition infringing on their IP. It's actually simple logic. I mean, it's just like if you would take the exterior of a brand new sportscar, put it on your old Ford and then sell it as a next-generation Ford called "morphord". You don't think that would be infringing on Ford's IP?

Now youre beeing stupid..  making up fictive scenarios to back up your oppinion..

Anyway, here we go again; MorphOS infringes on Amiga Inc.'s IP by using their ROM for their *competing* product. The AmigaROM is Amiga Inc.'s intellectual property and may not be used by a product that is a competing alternative to the original. An emulator is not a competing alternative or even a stand alone product but rather a complement to the original product. MorphOS is an OS (or claims to be atleast, sometime I doubt) and

Ok, now tell me, WHY do you doubt MOS is a real OS ?? Beacuse a man in a dream told you ?

as it makes use of both the ROM and even more parts from the rest of the AmigaOS, it is per definition infringing on Amiga Inc.'s IP. How could you possibly question this when it's obvious enough dazzle your eyes?

Sure, v0.4 uses parts of Amiga, if thats what youre talking about.