What would you have them to do? There's nothing else anybody can do... even the mighty Apple uses "generic x86 hardware". There is simply no choice out there today, if you want to be a player, you're bound to use generic x86. But at least they'll be using the best x86 hardware ... Intel SandyBridge
Again, I don't have a problem with Amiga-like OSes on x86 hardware - what I have a problem with is someone trying to pass off "x86 PC with a Commodore logo on it" as an actual Commodore computer. Commodore, the company, is dead. None of the people who made it what it was have anything to do with this venture - this is purely a case of a company dressing up in the trappings of a once-loved brand to hawk its own wares, which don't even bring anything special to the table.
I mean, seriously. I like Linux just fine, but
Linux is not AmigaOS, never has been, and never
will be. I don't care whether you're a devotee of AROS, MorphOS, ClassicWB, or even AOS4 - at least
those have some basis in the Amiga architecture and design philosophy, instead of being a "well, uh, we cobbled up a desktop environment that looks like Workbench!" Linux distro. Using that on your desktop? Okay, sure. Selling it as AmigaOS?
No.(And no, you don't
have to use x86. There's ARM, there's ColdFire, there's even Hitachi's SuperH architecture if you want. The domination of the Intel Hegemony isn't complete - not yet, anyway.