Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9 (PCMCIA ethernet)  (Read 1862 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #14 from previous page: May 05, 2006, 03:54:56 PM »
******************
 

Offline Oliver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 803
    • Show only replies by Oliver
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2006, 04:05:21 PM »
Looks pretty handy to me.  It seems that everything is included there, including a properly licensed stack?
Good good study, day day up!
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2006, 04:06:53 PM »
he has more - if you wanted one. quite a nice guy too



HOPE IT WORKS THOUGH. will not know until tomorrow or monday ill update you though!

that disk - do you think that is a seperate program where you do your PC browsing there - i.e. not done on WB but on that program diskette?

thanks!
******************
 

Offline Oliver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 803
    • Show only replies by Oliver
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2006, 04:13:35 PM »
From the description, I think the boot disk just configures your workbench session to work properly for communicating with a PC.   :-?
Good good study, day day up!
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #18 on: May 05, 2006, 04:18:54 PM »
it just seems to say that you dont need a modified A 1200 at all


just just need WB - and your PC drives will show

owing to the description it should work on any OS... there is no requirements
******************
 

Offline Oliver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 803
    • Show only replies by Oliver
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2006, 04:25:35 PM »
I think it should work on any 1200 with WB installed.  

Should be no probs for connecting with a PC, but you would probably want an accellerator anyway for other reasons (like running WHDLoad games: you posted about this before, right?).  Processor speed is also important if you want to browse the web (though you may not want to do this much with a 1200).
Good good study, day day up!
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2006, 04:30:38 PM »
well, first thing is first. get the two things networking. THEN get the A Card OH AND some 1200 LEDS that i annoyingly dont have lol

like i say, ill keep updated. i think this product is interesting for everyone here on the Amiga forums.
******************
 

Offline JuvUK

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 243
    • Show only replies by JuvUK
    • http://www.bobhoughtonferrari.co.uk
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2006, 05:18:12 PM »
hi
 i have dealt with paul willingham a few times in the past he is incredably helpful and very friendly, i can't recommend him enough!
Why does it always break?
 

Offline foleyjo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 608
    • Show only replies by foleyjo
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2006, 09:26:25 PM »
I got the same thing probably off the same guy.

I had a few issues with it at first setting up the software on the Amiga and PC but I just emailed him and he kept replying till I had it up and running.

I must say I didnt get the most out of it until I realised I had genesis with os3.9.

Good price too!!!
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #23 on: May 21, 2006, 08:58:50 PM »
anybody a screenshot of what OS3.5 can look like with an A1200 with 4Mb Fast Mem?
******************
 

Offline 3246251196Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by 3246251196
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #24 on: May 23, 2006, 11:35:24 PM »
you know you get some rather nice programs with 3.9, could you copy them to 3.5 if you wanted?
******************
 

Offline Chain

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1324
    • Show only replies by Chain
    • http://chain.3dgrafika.cz/aktivity
Re: OS3.5 Compared to OS3.9
« Reply #25 on: May 24, 2006, 07:49:49 PM »
Quote

3246251196 wrote:
you know you get some rather nice programs with 3.9, could you copy them to 3.5 if you wanted?


thar illegal genesis works too under 3.5 :)
too lazy to use shift key properly...